BACKGROUND: Large artery stiffness is a major determinant of pulse pressure (PP), and PP at baseline has been associated with future coronary events. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of the metabolic syndrome on aortic PP and ascending aortic pulsatility (AP) in patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries. METHODS: Forty-two patients with the metabolic syndrome and 40 age matched control subjects without the metabolic syndrome were included in the study. All subjects had normal coronary arteries. Diagnosis of the metabolic syndrome was based on the International Diabetes Federation guidelines published in 2005. Ascending AP was estimated as the ratio of aortic PP to mean blood pressure. RESULTS: Aortic PP (59+/-12 mmHg versus 43+/-10 mmHg; P<0.001) and ascending AP (0.54+/-0.10 versus 0.48+/-0.10; P<0.001) were significantly higher in the metabolic syndrome group. Multiple regression analysis revealed statistically independent relationships between ascending AP and fasting blood glucose, waist circumference and systolic blood pressure (model R2=0.408; P<0.001). The metabolic syndrome, as a whole, was also independently associated with both ascending AP (P<0.01) and aortic PP (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: The data showed that the metabolic syndrome is independently associated with increased aortic PP and ascending AP in patients with normal coronary arteries, suggesting aortic stiffness as one of the possible mechanisms underlying the excess cardiovascular risk associated with the metabolic syndrome.
BACKGROUND: Large artery stiffness is a major determinant of pulse pressure (PP), and PP at baseline has been associated with future coronary events. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of the metabolic syndrome on aortic PP and ascending aortic pulsatility (AP) in patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries. METHODS: Forty-two patients with the metabolic syndrome and 40 age matched control subjects without the metabolic syndrome were included in the study. All subjects had normal coronary arteries. Diagnosis of the metabolic syndrome was based on the International Diabetes Federation guidelines published in 2005. Ascending AP was estimated as the ratio of aortic PP to mean blood pressure. RESULTS: Aortic PP (59+/-12 mmHg versus 43+/-10 mmHg; P<0.001) and ascending AP (0.54+/-0.10 versus 0.48+/-0.10; P<0.001) were significantly higher in the metabolic syndrome group. Multiple regression analysis revealed statistically independent relationships between ascending AP and fasting blood glucose, waist circumference and systolic blood pressure (model R2=0.408; P<0.001). The metabolic syndrome, as a whole, was also independently associated with both ascending AP (P<0.01) and aortic PP (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: The data showed that the metabolic syndrome is independently associated with increased aortic PP and ascending AP in patients with normal coronary arteries, suggesting aortic stiffness as one of the possible mechanisms underlying the excess cardiovascular risk associated with the metabolic syndrome.
Authors: K Sutton-Tyrrell; A Newman; E M Simonsick; R Havlik; M Pahor; E Lakatta; H Spurgeon; P Vaitkevicius Journal: Hypertension Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: S Laurent; P Boutouyrie; R Asmar; I Gautier; B Laloux; L Guize; P Ducimetiere; A Benetos Journal: Hypertension Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Hanna-Maaria Lakka; David E Laaksonen; Timo A Lakka; Leo K Niskanen; Esko Kumpusalo; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Jukka T Salonen Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-12-04 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jack Wang; John C Thornton; Salina Bari; Bennett Williamson; Dympna Gallagher; Steven B Heymsfield; Mary Horlick; Donald Kotler; Blandine Laferrère; Laurel Mayer; F Xavier Pi-Sunyer; Richard N Pierson Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Harold Smulyan; Danish S Siddiqui; Raymond J Carlson; Gerard M London; Michel E Safar Journal: Hypertension Date: 2003-07-14 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Atul Singhal; I Sadaf Farooqi; Tim J Cole; Stephen O'Rahilly; Mary Fewtrell; Mia Kattenhorn; Alan Lucas; John Deanfield Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-10-08 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: E DeVallance; S Fournier; K Lemaster; C Moore; S Asano; D Bonner; D Donley; I M Olfert; P D Chantler Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2016-03-03 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Pauliina Kangas; Antti Tikkakoski; Jarkko Kettunen; Arttu Eräranta; Heini Huhtala; Mika Kähönen; Kalle Sipilä; Jukka Mustonen; Ilkka Pörsti Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-12-05 Impact factor: 4.379