Literature DB >> 12540397

Comparisons of waist circumferences measured at 4 sites.

Jack Wang1, John C Thornton, Salina Bari, Bennett Williamson, Dympna Gallagher, Steven B Heymsfield, Mary Horlick, Donald Kotler, Blandine Laferrère, Laurel Mayer, F Xavier Pi-Sunyer, Richard N Pierson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Waist circumference (WC) is now accepted as a practical measure of adipose tissue distribution. Four body sites for WC measurements are commonly used, as follows: immediately below the lowest ribs (WC1), the narrowest waist (WC2), the midpoint between the lowest rib and the iliac crest (WC3), and immediately above the iliac crest (WC4).
OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the magnitude and reliability of WC measured at these 4 sites in males and females.
DESIGN: WC was measured at each site 1 time in all subjects [49 males and 62 females, aged 7-83 y, with a body mass index (in kg/m(2)) of 9-43] and 3 times in a subgroup (n = 93) by one experienced observer using a heavy-duty inelastic tape. Body fat was measured in a subgroup (n = 74) with the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
RESULTS: The mean values of WC were WC2 < WC1 < WC3 < WC4 (P < 0.01) in females and WC2 < WC1, WC3, and WC4 (P < 0.01) in males. For all 4 sites, measurement reproducibility was high, with intraclass correlation (r) values > 0.99. WC values were significantly correlated with fatness; correlations with trunk fat were higher than correlations with total body fat in both sexes.
CONCLUSIONS: WC values at the 4 commonly used anatomic sites differ in magnitude depending on sex, are highly reproducible, and are correlated with total body and trunk adiposity in a sex-dependent manner. These observations have implications for the use of WC measurements in clinical practice and patient-oriented research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12540397     DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/77.2.379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  130 in total

1.  A weight-loss diet including coffee-derived mannooligosaccharides enhances adipose tissue loss in overweight men but not women.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre St-Onge; Taylor Salinardi; Kristin Herron-Rubin; Richard M Black
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 5.002

2.  Independent effects of age-related changes in waist circumference and BMI z scores in predicting cardiovascular disease risk factors in a prospective cohort of adolescent females.

Authors:  David J Tybor; Alice H Lichtenstein; Gerard E Dallal; Stephen R Daniels; Aviva Must
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  Waist circumference is the best index for obesity-related cardiovascular disease risk in individuals with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Henrike Rianne Joanna Cornelie Ravensbergen; Scott Alexander Lear; Victoria Elizabeth Claydon
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 5.269

4.  Measurement matters.

Authors:  Mary Horlick; Mary L Hediger
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.406

5.  Impact of the metabolic syndrome on aortic pulse pressure and ascending aortic pulsatility in patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries.

Authors:  Ayse Emre; Dilaver Oz; Kemal Yesilcimen; Nurten Sayar; Dilek Ergun
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.223

6.  A new predictive equation for evaluating women body fat percentage and obesity-related cardiovascular disease risk.

Authors:  A De Lorenzo; A Nardi; L Iacopino; E Domino; G Murdolo; C Gavrila; D Minella; G Scapagnini; L Di Renzo
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 4.256

7.  The effect of work-time influence on health and well-being: a quasi-experimental intervention study among eldercare workers.

Authors:  Kirsten Nabe-Nielsen; Anne Helene Garde; Finn Diderichsen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2011-03-05       Impact factor: 3.015

8.  Correlations of neck circumference with body composition and cardiometabolic risk factors in Arab women.

Authors:  Reem S Albassam; Kai Y Lei; Abdullah M Alnaami; Nasser M Al-Daghri
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 4.652

9.  Interethnic differences in the accuracy of anthropometric indicators of obesity in screening for high risk of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  V M Herrera; J P Casas; J J Miranda; P Perel; R Pichardo; A González; J R Sanchez; C Ferreccio; X Aguilera; E Silva; M Oróstegui; L F Gómez; J A Chirinos; J Medina-Lezama; C M Pérez; E Suárez; A P Ortiz; L Rosero; N Schapochnik; Z Ortiz; D Ferrante; M Diaz; L E Bautista
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 5.095

10.  Prediction of Android and Gynoid Body Adiposity via a Three-dimensional Stereovision Body Imaging System and Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry.

Authors:  Jane J Lee; Jeanne H Freeland-Graves; M Reese Pepper; Philip R Stanforth; Bugao Xu
Journal:  J Am Coll Nutr       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.