BACKGROUND: Waist circumference (WC) is now accepted as a practical measure of adipose tissue distribution. Four body sites for WC measurements are commonly used, as follows: immediately below the lowest ribs (WC1), the narrowest waist (WC2), the midpoint between the lowest rib and the iliac crest (WC3), and immediately above the iliac crest (WC4). OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the magnitude and reliability of WC measured at these 4 sites in males and females. DESIGN: WC was measured at each site 1 time in all subjects [49 males and 62 females, aged 7-83 y, with a body mass index (in kg/m(2)) of 9-43] and 3 times in a subgroup (n = 93) by one experienced observer using a heavy-duty inelastic tape. Body fat was measured in a subgroup (n = 74) with the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: The mean values of WC were WC2 < WC1 < WC3 < WC4 (P < 0.01) in females and WC2 < WC1, WC3, and WC4 (P < 0.01) in males. For all 4 sites, measurement reproducibility was high, with intraclass correlation (r) values > 0.99. WC values were significantly correlated with fatness; correlations with trunk fat were higher than correlations with total body fat in both sexes. CONCLUSIONS: WC values at the 4 commonly used anatomic sites differ in magnitude depending on sex, are highly reproducible, and are correlated with total body and trunk adiposity in a sex-dependent manner. These observations have implications for the use of WC measurements in clinical practice and patient-oriented research.
BACKGROUND: Waist circumference (WC) is now accepted as a practical measure of adipose tissue distribution. Four body sites for WC measurements are commonly used, as follows: immediately below the lowest ribs (WC1), the narrowest waist (WC2), the midpoint between the lowest rib and the iliac crest (WC3), and immediately above the iliac crest (WC4). OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the magnitude and reliability of WC measured at these 4 sites in males and females. DESIGN: WC was measured at each site 1 time in all subjects [49 males and 62 females, aged 7-83 y, with a body mass index (in kg/m(2)) of 9-43] and 3 times in a subgroup (n = 93) by one experienced observer using a heavy-duty inelastic tape. Body fat was measured in a subgroup (n = 74) with the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: The mean values of WC were WC2 < WC1 < WC3 < WC4 (P < 0.01) in females and WC2 < WC1, WC3, and WC4 (P < 0.01) in males. For all 4 sites, measurement reproducibility was high, with intraclass correlation (r) values > 0.99. WC values were significantly correlated with fatness; correlations with trunk fat were higher than correlations with total body fat in both sexes. CONCLUSIONS: WC values at the 4 commonly used anatomic sites differ in magnitude depending on sex, are highly reproducible, and are correlated with total body and trunk adiposity in a sex-dependent manner. These observations have implications for the use of WC measurements in clinical practice and patient-oriented research.
Authors: Marie-Pierre St-Onge; Taylor Salinardi; Kristin Herron-Rubin; Richard M Black Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2011-09-22 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: David J Tybor; Alice H Lichtenstein; Gerard E Dallal; Stephen R Daniels; Aviva Must Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2010-12-08 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Henrike Rianne Joanna Cornelie Ravensbergen; Scott Alexander Lear; Victoria Elizabeth Claydon Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2013-12-11 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: A De Lorenzo; A Nardi; L Iacopino; E Domino; G Murdolo; C Gavrila; D Minella; G Scapagnini; L Di Renzo Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2014-01-24 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: V M Herrera; J P Casas; J J Miranda; P Perel; R Pichardo; A González; J R Sanchez; C Ferreccio; X Aguilera; E Silva; M Oróstegui; L F Gómez; J A Chirinos; J Medina-Lezama; C M Pérez; E Suárez; A P Ortiz; L Rosero; N Schapochnik; Z Ortiz; D Ferrante; M Diaz; L E Bautista Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2009-02-24 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Jane J Lee; Jeanne H Freeland-Graves; M Reese Pepper; Philip R Stanforth; Bugao Xu Journal: J Am Coll Nutr Date: 2015-04-27 Impact factor: 3.169