Literature DB >> 19583464

Effect of attention on early cortical processes associated with the sound-induced extra flash illusion.

Jyoti Mishra1, Antigona Martínez, Steven A Hillyard.   

Abstract

When a single flash of light is presented interposed between two brief auditory stimuli separated by 60-100 msec, subjects typically report perceiving two flashes [Shams, L., Kamitani, Y., & Shimojo, S. Visual illusion induced by sound. Brain Research, Cognitive Brain Research, 14, 147-152, 2002; Shams, L., Kamitani, Y., & Shimojo, S. Illusions. What you see is what you hear. Nature, 408, 788, 2000]. Using ERP recordings, we previously found that perception of the illusory extra flash was accompanied by a rapid dynamic interplay between auditory and visual cortical areas that was triggered by the second sound [Mishra, J., Martínez, A., Sejnowski, T. J., & Hillyard, S. A. Early cross-modal interactions in auditory and visual cortex underlie a sound-induced visual illusion. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 4120-4131, 2007]. In the current study, we investigated the effect of attention on the ERP components associated with the illusory extra flash in 15 individuals who perceived this cross-modal illusion frequently. All early ERP components in the cross-modal difference wave associated with the extra flash illusion were significantly enhanced by selective spatial attention. The earliest attention-related modulation was an amplitude increase of the positive-going PD110/PD120 component, which was previously shown to be correlated with an individual's propensity to perceive the illusory second flash [Mishra, J., Martínez, A., Sejnowski, T. J., & Hillyard, S. A. Early cross-modal interactions in auditory and visual cortex underlie a sound-induced visual illusion. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 4120-4131, 2007]. The polarity of the early PD110/PD120 component did not differ as a function of the visual field (upper vs. lower) of stimulus presentation. This, along with the source localization of the component, suggested that its principal generator lies in extrastriate visual cortex. These results indicate that neural processes previously shown to be associated with the extra flash illusion can be modulated by attention, and thus are not the result of a wholly automatic cross-modal integration process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19583464     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  24 in total

1.  The cross-modal spread of attention reveals differential constraints for the temporal and spatial linking of visual and auditory stimulus events.

Authors:  Sarah E Donohue; Kenneth C Roberts; Tineke Grent-'t-Jong; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Illusory double flashes can speed up responses like physical ones: evidence from the sound-induced flash illusion.

Authors:  Anja Fiedler; Julie L O'Sullivan; Hannes Schröter; Jeff Miller; Rolf Ulrich
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  The multifaceted interplay between attention and multisensory integration.

Authors:  Durk Talsma; Daniel Senkowski; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Phenomenology of the sound-induced flash illusion.

Authors:  Richard V Abadi; Jonathan S Murphy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Temporal integration of multisensory stimuli in autism spectrum disorder: a predictive coding perspective.

Authors:  Jason S Chan; Anne Langer; Jochen Kaiser
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.575

6.  Deploying attention to the target location of a pointing action modulates audiovisual processes at nontarget locations.

Authors:  Tristan Loria; Kanji Tanaka; Katsumi Watanabe; Luc Tremblay
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Auditory and audio-visual processing in patients with cochlear, auditory brainstem, and auditory midbrain implants: An EEG study.

Authors:  Irina Schierholz; Mareike Finke; Andrej Kral; Andreas Büchner; Stefan Rach; Thomas Lenarz; Reinhard Dengler; Pascale Sandmann
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Comparison of congruence judgment and auditory localization tasks for assessing the spatial limits of visual capture.

Authors:  Adam K Bosen; Justin T Fleming; Sarah E Brown; Paul D Allen; William E O'Neill; Gary D Paige
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 2.086

9.  Audition influences color processing in the sound-induced visual flash illusion.

Authors:  Jyoti Mishra; Antigona Martinez; Steven A Hillyard
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Multisensory integration, aging, and the sound-induced flash illusion.

Authors:  Denton J DeLoss; Russell S Pierce; George J Andersen
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2013-08-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.