Literature DB >> 19582240

Premolar cuspal flexure as a function of restorative material and occlusal contact location.

Pascal Magne1, Tevan Oganesyan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To measure cuspal flexure of intact and restored maxillary premolars with different restorative materials and occlusal contacts. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Micro?computed tomography data were used to generate finite-element models with a mesio-occlusaldistal (MOD) cavity preparation and the corresponding restoration. The tooth parts were imported in finite-element software to create 3D volumetric models. Occlusal loading either in enamel, at restoration margin, or in restorative material was simulated by linear contact analysis. Cuspal widening was measured for the different contact locations and restorative conditions (unaltered tooth, MOD porcelain, and composite-inlay restorations).
RESULTS: For a given material property, contacts in restoration generated the least amount of cuspal deformation, followed by the enamel contacts and contacts at restoration margin. Models of the intact tooth and ceramic inlay behaved similarly (cuspal widening at 100 N ranging from 1.8 to 3.0 microm and 1.6 to 2.6 microm, respectively). Cuspal flexure was increased in the MOD composite resin restorations (3.4 to 5.7 microm at 100 N of axial force). The least amount of deformation was generated in the ceramic inlay with contacts in only restoration (1.6 microm at 100 N) and the largest in the composite inlay with contacts at restoration margins (5.7 microm at 100 N). For the composite restoration, antagonist contacts at restoration margins were less favorable compared to located on either enamel or the restoration itself.
CONCLUSION: A relatively small cuspal deformation was observed in all models. There is an increased cusp-stabilizing effect of ceramic inlays compared to composite ones.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19582240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quintessence Int        ISSN: 0033-6572            Impact factor:   1.677


  6 in total

1.  Do composite resin restorations protect cracked teeth? An in-vitro study.

Authors:  O Naka; B J Millar; D Sagris; C David
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 2.  Precision medicine using patient-specific modelling: state of the art and perspectives in dental practice.

Authors:  Pierre Lahoud; Reinhilde Jacobs; Philippe Boisse; Mostafa EzEldeen; Maxime Ducret; Raphael Richert
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 3.606

3.  Effect of Extension and Type of Composite-Restored Class II Cavities on Biomechanical Properties of Teeth: A Three Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Azam Valian; Elham Moravej-Salehi; Allahyar Geramy; Elham Faramarzi
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2015-02

4.  Analysis of the abfraction lesions formation mechanism by the finite element method.

Authors:  Selma Jakupovic; Edin Cerjakovic; Alan Topcic; Muhamed Ajanovic; Alma Konjhodzic- Prcic; Amra Vukovic
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2014-08-21

5.  Stress analysis of occlusal forces in canine teeth and their role in the development of non-carious cervical lesions: abfraction.

Authors:  Shihab A Romeed; Raheel Malik; Stephen M Dunne
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-07-30

6.  A comparative analysis of restorative materials used in abfraction lesions in tooth with and without occlusal restoration: Three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  A Srirekha; Kusum Bashetty
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2013-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.