Literature DB >> 19581600

Resources and energetics determined dinosaur maximal size.

Brian K McNab1.   

Abstract

Some dinosaurs reached masses that were approximately 8 times those of the largest, ecologically equivalent terrestrial mammals. The factors most responsible for setting the maximal body size of vertebrates are resource quality and quantity, as modified by the mobility of the consumer, and the vertebrate's rate of energy expenditure. If the food intake of the largest herbivorous mammals defines the maximal rate at which plant resources can be consumed in terrestrial environments and if that limit applied to dinosaurs, then the large size of sauropods occurred because they expended energy in the field at rates extrapolated from those of varanid lizards, which are approximately 22% of the rates in mammals and 3.6 times the rates of other lizards of equal size. Of 2 species having the same energy income, the species that uses the most energy for mass-independent maintenance of necessity has a smaller size. The larger mass found in some marine mammals reflects a greater resource abundance in marine environments. The presumptively low energy expenditures of dinosaurs potentially permitted Mesozoic communities to support dinosaur biomasses that were up to 5 times those found in mammalian herbivores in Africa today. The maximal size of predatory theropods was approximately 8 tons, which if it reflected the maximal capacity to consume vertebrates in terrestrial environments, corresponds in predatory mammals to a maximal mass less than a ton, which is what is observed. Some coelurosaurs may have evolved endothermy in association with the evolution of feathered insulation and a small mass.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19581600      PMCID: PMC2715483          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0904000106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  18 in total

Review 1.  Energetics of free-ranging mammals, reptiles, and birds.

Authors:  K A Nagy; I A Girard; T K Brown
Journal:  Annu Rev Nutr       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 11.848

2.  Dinosaurian growth patterns and rapid avian growth rates.

Authors:  G M Erickson; K C Rogers; S A Yerby
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-07-26       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Energy availability and density estimates in African ungulates.

Authors:  Nathalie Pettorelli; Jakob Bro-Jørgensen; Sarah M Durant; Tim Blackburn; Chris Carbone
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Argentine dinos vie for heavyweight titles.

Authors:  T Appenzeller
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-12-16       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Ecological factors affect the level and scaling of avian BMR.

Authors:  Brian Keith McNab
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 2.320

6.  The effect of large body size on the temperature regulation of the Komodo dragon, Varanus komodoensis.

Authors:  B K McNab; W Auffenberg
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol       Date:  1976

7.  Dinosaurian growth rates and bird origins.

Authors:  K Padian; A J de Ricqlès; J R Horner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-07-26       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  On the evolution and adaptive significance of postnatal growth rates in the terrestrial vertebrates.

Authors:  T J Case
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 4.875

9.  Thermophysiology of Tyrannosaurus rex: Evidence from Oxygen Isotopes.

Authors:  R E Barrick; W J Showers
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-07-08       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Dinosaur fossils predict body temperatures.

Authors:  James F Gillooly; Andrew P Allen; Eric L Charnov
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  16 in total

1.  Geographic and temporal correlations of mammalian size reconsidered: a resource rule.

Authors:  Brian K McNab
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-04-03       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Effects of allometry, productivity and lifestyle on rates and limits of body size evolution.

Authors:  Jordan G Okie; Alison G Boyer; James H Brown; Daniel P Costa; S K Morgan Ernest; Alistair R Evans; Mikael Fortelius; John L Gittleman; Marcus J Hamilton; Larisa E Harding; Kari Lintulaakso; S Kathleen Lyons; Juha J Saarinen; Felisa A Smith; Patrick R Stephens; Jessica Theodor; Mark D Uhen; Richard M Sibly
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Mechanical implications of pneumatic neck vertebrae in sauropod dinosaurs.

Authors:  Daniela Schwarz-Wings; Christian A Meyer; Eberhard Frey; Hans-Rudolf Manz-Steiner; Ralf Schumacher
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Evolution of dinosaur epidermal structures.

Authors:  Paul M Barrett; David C Evans; Nicolás E Campione
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 5.  Biology of the sauropod dinosaurs: the evolution of gigantism.

Authors:  P Martin Sander; Andreas Christian; Marcus Clauss; Regina Fechner; Carole T Gee; Eva-Maria Griebeler; Hanns-Christian Gunga; Jürgen Hummel; Heinrich Mallison; Steven F Perry; Holger Preuschoft; Oliver W M Rauhut; Kristian Remes; Thomas Tütken; Oliver Wings; Ulrich Witzel
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2011-02

6.  Skull and buccal cavity allometry increase mass-specific engulfment capacity in fin whales.

Authors:  Jeremy A Goldbogen; Jean Potvin; Robert E Shadwick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Metabolic expenditures of lunge feeding rorquals across scale: implications for the evolution of filter feeding and the limits to maximum body size.

Authors:  Jean Potvin; Jeremy A Goldbogen; Robert E Shadwick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Body temperatures in dinosaurs: what can growth curves tell us?

Authors:  Eva Maria Griebeler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  How large should whales be?

Authors:  Aaron Clauset
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Maximal aerobic and anaerobic power generation in large crocodiles versus mammals: implications for dinosaur gigantothermy.

Authors:  Roger S Seymour
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.