BACKGROUND: Rescuer fatigue during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a likely contributor to variable CPR quality during clinical resuscitation efforts, yet investigations into fatigue and CPR quality degradation have only been performed in simulated environments, with widely conflicting results. OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize CPR quality decay during actual in-hospital cardiac arrest, with regard to both chest compression (CC) rate and depth during the delivery of CCs by individual rescuers over time. METHODS: Using CPR recording technology to objectively quantify CCs and provide audiovisual feedback, we prospectively collected CPR performance data from arrest events in two hospitals. We identified continuous CPR "blocks" from individual rescuers, assessing CC rate and depth over time. RESULTS: 135 blocks of continuous CPR were identified from 42 cardiac arrests at the two institutions. Median duration of continuous CPR blocks was 112s (IQR 101-122). CC rate did not change significantly over single rescuer performance, with an initial mean rate of 105+/-11/min, and a mean rate after 3 min of 106+/-9/min (p=NS). However, CC depth decayed significantly between 90s and 2 min, falling from a mean of 48.3+/-9.6mm to 46.0+/-9.0mm (p=0.0006) and to 43.7+/-7.4mm by 3 min (p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: During actual in-hospital CPR with audiovisual feedback, CC depth decay became evident after 90s of CPR, but CC rate did not change. These data provide clinical evidence for rescuer fatigue during actual resuscitations and support current guideline recommendations to rotate rescuers during CC delivery.
BACKGROUND: Rescuer fatigue during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a likely contributor to variable CPR quality during clinical resuscitation efforts, yet investigations into fatigue and CPR quality degradation have only been performed in simulated environments, with widely conflicting results. OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize CPR quality decay during actual in-hospital cardiac arrest, with regard to both chest compression (CC) rate and depth during the delivery of CCs by individual rescuers over time. METHODS: Using CPR recording technology to objectively quantify CCs and provide audiovisual feedback, we prospectively collected CPR performance data from arrest events in two hospitals. We identified continuous CPR "blocks" from individual rescuers, assessing CC rate and depth over time. RESULTS: 135 blocks of continuous CPR were identified from 42 cardiac arrests at the two institutions. Median duration of continuous CPR blocks was 112s (IQR 101-122). CC rate did not change significantly over single rescuer performance, with an initial mean rate of 105+/-11/min, and a mean rate after 3 min of 106+/-9/min (p=NS). However, CC depth decayed significantly between 90s and 2 min, falling from a mean of 48.3+/-9.6mm to 46.0+/-9.0mm (p=0.0006) and to 43.7+/-7.4mm by 3 min (p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: During actual in-hospital CPR with audiovisual feedback, CC depth decay became evident after 90s of CPR, but CC rate did not change. These data provide clinical evidence for rescuer fatigue during actual resuscitations and support current guideline recommendations to rotate rescuers during CC delivery.
Authors: Andrew J Boyle; Andrew M Wilson; Kim Connelly; Louisa McGuigan; Jenny Wilson; Robert Whitbourn Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Benjamin S Abella; Dana P Edelson; Salem Kim; Elizabeth Retzer; Helge Myklebust; Anne M Barry; Nicholas O'Hearn; Terry L Vanden Hoek; Lance B Becker Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2007-01-26 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Michael R Sayre; Robert A Berg; Diana M Cave; Richard L Page; Jerald Potts; Roger D White Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-03-31 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: R J Van Hoeyweghen; L L Bossaert; A Mullie; P Calle; P Martens; W A Buylaert; H Delooz Journal: Resuscitation Date: 1993-08 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Akira Nishisaki; Jon Nysaether; Robert Sutton; Matthew Maltese; Dana Niles; Aaron Donoghue; Ram Bishnoi; Mark Helfaer; Gavin D Perkins; Robert Berg; Kristy Arbogast; Vinay Nadkarni Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2009-04-01 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Venkataraman Anantharaman; Boon Lui Benjamin Ng; Shiang Hu Ang; Chun Yue Francis Lee; Siew Hon Benjamin Leong; Marcus Eng Hock Ong; Siang Jin Terrance Chua; Antony Charles Rabind; Nagaraj Baglody Anjali; Ying Hao Journal: Singapore Med J Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 1.858
Authors: David A Fried; Marion Leary; Douglas A Smith; Robert M Sutton; Dana Niles; Daniel L Herzberg; Lance B Becker; Benjamin S Abella Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2011-04-08 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Jasmeet Soar; Mary E Mancini; Farhan Bhanji; John E Billi; Jennifer Dennett; Judith Finn; Matthew Huei-Ming Ma; Gavin D Perkins; David L Rodgers; Mary Fran Hazinski; Ian Jacobs; Peter T Morley Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 5.262