Literature DB >> 19580772

Direct measurement of association and dissociation rates of DNA binding in live cells by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy.

Ariel Michelman-Ribeiro1, Davide Mazza, Tilman Rosales, Timothy J Stasevich, Hacene Boukari, Vikas Rishi, Charles Vinson, Jay R Knutson, James G McNally.   

Abstract

Measurement of live-cell binding interactions is vital for understanding the biochemical reactions that drive cellular processes. Here, we develop, characterize, and apply a new procedure to extract information about binding to an immobile substrate from fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) autocorrelation data. We show that existing methods for analyzing such data by two-component diffusion fits can produce inaccurate estimates of diffusion constants and bound fractions, or even fail altogether to fit FCS binding data. By analyzing live-cell FCS measurements, we show that our new model can satisfactorily account for the binding interactions introduced by attaching a DNA binding domain to the dimerization domain derived from a site-specific transcription factor (the vitellogenin binding protein (VBP)). We find that our FCS estimates are quantitatively consistent with our fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) measurements on the same VBP domains. However, due to the fast binding interactions introduced by the DNA binding domain, FCS generates independent estimates for the diffusion constant (6.7 +/- 2.4 microm2/s) and the association (2 +/- 1.2 s(-1)) and dissociation (19 +/- 7 s(-1)) rates, whereas FRAP produces only a single, but a consistent, estimate, the effective-diffusion constant (4.4 +/- 1.4 microm2/s), which depends on all three parameters. We apply this new FCS method to evaluate the efficacy of a potential anticancer drug that inhibits DNA binding of VBP in vitro and find that in vivo the drug inhibits DNA binding in only a subset of cells. In sum, we provide a straightforward approach to directly measure binding rates from FCS data.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19580772      PMCID: PMC2711375          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.04.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  30 in total

Review 1.  Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy measures molecular transport in cells.

Authors:  E L Elson
Journal:  Traffic       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.215

Review 2.  Kinetic modelling approaches to in vivo imaging.

Authors:  R D Phair; T Misteli
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 3.  Classification of human B-ZIP proteins based on dimerization properties.

Authors:  Charles Vinson; Max Myakishev; Asha Acharya; Alain A Mir; Jonathan R Moll; Maria Bonovich
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Analysis of binding reactions by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching.

Authors:  Brian L Sprague; Robert L Pego; Diana A Stavreva; James G McNally
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Quantification of transport and binding parameters using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. Potential for in vivo applications.

Authors:  E N Kaufman; R K Jain
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  New concepts for fluorescence correlation spectroscopy on membranes.

Authors:  Jonas Ries; Petra Schwille
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 3.676

7.  Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy and photobleaching recovery of multiple binding reactions. II. FPR and FCS measurements at low and high DNA concentrations.

Authors:  R D Icenogle; E L Elson
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 2.505

8.  Specific binding of proinsulin C-peptide to human cell membranes.

Authors:  R Rigler; A Pramanik; P Jonasson; G Kratz; O T Jansson; P Nygren; S Stâhl; K Ekberg; B Johansson; S Uhlén; M Uhlén; H Jörnvall; J Wahren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-11-09       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Attractive interhelical electrostatic interactions in the proline- and acidic-rich region (PAR) leucine zipper subfamily preclude heterodimerization with other basic leucine zipper subfamilies.

Authors:  J R Moll; M Olive; C Vinson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-11-03       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  High- and low-mobility populations of HP1 in heterochromatin of mammalian cells.

Authors:  Lars Schmiedeberg; Klaus Weisshart; Stephan Diekmann; Gabriele Meyer Zu Hoerste; Peter Hemmerich
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2004-04-02       Impact factor: 4.138

View more
  55 in total

1.  Real-time observation of transcription initiation and elongation on an endogenous yeast gene.

Authors:  Daniel R Larson; Daniel Zenklusen; Bin Wu; Jeffrey A Chao; Robert H Singer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Cross-validating FRAP and FCS to quantify the impact of photobleaching on in vivo binding estimates.

Authors:  Timothy J Stasevich; Florian Mueller; Ariel Michelman-Ribeiro; Tilman Rosales; Jay R Knutson; James G McNally
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Simultaneous detection of intracellular target and off-target binding of small molecule cancer drugs at nanomolar concentrations.

Authors:  Heike Glauner; Ivo R Ruttekolk; Kerrin Hansen; Ben Steemers; Yi-Da Chung; Frank Becker; Stefan Hannus; Roland Brock
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  An Intermittent Model for Intracellular Motions of Gold Nanostars by k-Space Scattering Image Correlation.

Authors:  Margaux Bouzin; Laura Sironi; Giuseppe Chirico; Laura D'Alfonso; Donato Inverso; Piersandro Pallavicini; Maddalena Collini
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Inferring diffusion dynamics from FCS in heterogeneous nuclear environments.

Authors:  Konstantinos Tsekouras; Amanda P Siegel; Richard N Day; Steve Pressé
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Human ISWI chromatin-remodeling complexes sample nucleosomes via transient binding reactions and become immobilized at active sites.

Authors:  Fabian Erdel; Thomas Schubert; Caroline Marth; Gernot Längst; Karsten Rippe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A refined reaction-diffusion model of tau-microtubule dynamics and its application in FDAP analysis.

Authors:  Maxim Igaev; Dennis Janning; Frederik Sündermann; Benedikt Niewidok; Roland Brandt; Wolfgang Junge
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Exploring the dynamics of cell processes through simulations of fluorescence microscopy experiments.

Authors:  Juan Angiolini; Nicolas Plachta; Esteban Mocskos; Valeria Levi
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Live-cell imaging reveals the interplay between transcription factors, nucleosomes, and bursting.

Authors:  Benjamin T Donovan; Anh Huynh; David A Ball; Heta P Patel; Michael G Poirier; Daniel R Larson; Matthew L Ferguson; Tineke L Lenstra
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Stochastic and reversible assembly of a multiprotein DNA repair complex ensures accurate target site recognition and efficient repair.

Authors:  Martijn S Luijsterburg; Gesa von Bornstaedt; Audrey M Gourdin; Antonio Z Politi; Martijn J Moné; Daniël O Warmerdam; Joachim Goedhart; Wim Vermeulen; Roel van Driel; Thomas Höfer
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 10.539

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.