Literature DB >> 19578857

[Anterior surface breakdown following evisceration : "Classic", "scleral modification", and "scleral patch techniques"].

J W C Vijlbrief1, F Hafezi, D Paridaens.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the frequency of anterior surface breakdown for three techniques of evisceration with primary implant placement: the "classic" technique, the "scleral modification" technique, and the novel "scleral patch" technique.
METHODS: Retrospective comparative case series with 73 consecutive eviscerations with primary implants that were performed in the Eye Clinic Rotterdam between January 2003 and January 2007.
RESULTS: The operations involved the classic technique for 55% of the patients, scleral modification for 29%, and the novel scleral patch technique for 16%. In all, 9.6% of the patients had conjunctival breakdown: six in the classic group and one in the patch group. Although the frequency of this complication was higher in the classic group, the difference was not significant (P>0.05, chi-square test). Anterior surface breakdown was not related to implant size or prior eye surgery.
CONCLUSION: Compared with the scleral modification and scleral patch techniques, conjunctival breakdown and implant extrusion were seen more frequently after classic evisceration with implant placement. Implant size or indication for surgery were not related to the frequency of these complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19578857     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-009-1988-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  18 in total

1.  Review of 1028 bulbar eviscerations and enucleations. Changes in aetiology and frequency over a 20-year period.

Authors:  A B Hansen; C Petersen; S Heegaard; J U Prause
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  1999-06

2.  Evisceration with scleral modification.

Authors:  G G Massry; J B Holds
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.746

3.  Evisceration with posterior sclerotomies.

Authors:  D R Jordan; L M Khouri
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.882

4.  [How can artificial eye motility be improved? The influence of fornix configuration and tissue thickness in front of hydroxyapatite-silicon implants in 66 patients].

Authors:  A Klett; R Guthoff
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  [Muscle pedunculated scleral flaps. A microsurgical modification to improve prosthesis motility].

Authors:  A Klett; R Guthoff
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 6.  Enucleation versus evisceration.

Authors:  Michael E Migliori
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.761

7.  Comparison after 10 years of two 100-patient cohorts operated on for eviscerations or enucleations.

Authors:  O Genevois; P Millet; A Retout; J C Quintyn
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.597

Review 8.  Evisceration with hydroxyapatite implant. Surgical technique and review of 31 case reports.

Authors:  D A Kostick; J V Linberg
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Long-term follow-up of porous polyethylene spherical implants after enucleation and evisceration.

Authors:  A Alwitry; S West; J King; A J Foss; L C Abercrombie
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.746

10.  A simple algorithm for selection of implant size for enucleation and evisceration: a prospective study.

Authors:  Sara A Kaltreider; Mark J Lucarelli
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.746

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.