PURPOSE: Twenty-four-hour diet recall interviews (24HRs) are used to assess diet and to validate other diet assessment instruments. Therefore it is important to know how many 24HRs are required to describe an individual's intake. METHOD: Seventy-nine middle-aged white women completed seven 24HRs over a 14-day period, during which energy expenditure (EE) was determined by the doubly labeled water method (DLW). Mean daily intakes were compared to DLW-derived EE using paired t tests. Linear mixed models were used to evaluate the effect of call sequence and day of the week on 24HR-derived energy intake while adjusting for education, relative body weight, social desirability, and an interaction between call sequence and social desirability. RESULTS: Mean EE from DLW was 2115 kcal/day. Adjusted 24HR-derived energy intake was lowest at call 1 (1501 kcal/day); significantly higher energy intake was observed at calls 2 and 3 (2246 and 2315 kcal/day, respectively). Energy intake on Friday was significantly lower than on Sunday. Averaging energy intake from the first two calls better approximated true energy expenditure than did the first call, and averaging the first three calls further improved the estimate (p=0.02 for both comparisons). Additional calls did not improve estimation. CONCLUSIONS: Energy intake is underreported on the first 24HR. Three 24HRs appear optimal for estimating energy intake.
PURPOSE: Twenty-four-hour diet recall interviews (24HRs) are used to assess diet and to validate other diet assessment instruments. Therefore it is important to know how many 24HRs are required to describe an individual's intake. METHOD: Seventy-nine middle-aged white women completed seven 24HRs over a 14-day period, during which energy expenditure (EE) was determined by the doubly labeled water method (DLW). Mean daily intakes were compared to DLW-derived EE using paired t tests. Linear mixed models were used to evaluate the effect of call sequence and day of the week on 24HR-derived energy intake while adjusting for education, relative body weight, social desirability, and an interaction between call sequence and social desirability. RESULTS: Mean EE from DLW was 2115 kcal/day. Adjusted 24HR-derived energy intake was lowest at call 1 (1501 kcal/day); significantly higher energy intake was observed at calls 2 and 3 (2246 and 2315 kcal/day, respectively). Energy intake on Friday was significantly lower than on Sunday. Averaging energy intake from the first two calls better approximated true energy expenditure than did the first call, and averaging the first three calls further improved the estimate (p=0.02 for both comparisons). Additional calls did not improve estimation. CONCLUSIONS: Energy intake is underreported on the first 24HR. Three 24HRs appear optimal for estimating energy intake.
Authors: James R Hebert; Cara B Ebbeling; Charles E Matthews; Thomas G Hurley; Yunsheng MA; Susan Druker; Lynn Clemow Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: W C Willett; L Sampson; M J Stampfer; B Rosner; C Bain; J Witschi; C H Hennekens; F E Speizer Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1985-07 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Barbara C Olendzki; Yunsheng Ma; James R Hébert; Sherry L Pagoto; Philip A Merriam; Milagros C Rosal; Ira S Ockene Journal: J Am Diet Assoc Date: 2008-06
Authors: B Olendzki; E Procter-Gray; M F Magee; G Youssef; K Kane; L Churchill; J Ockene; W Li Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2017 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Ana Gabriella Costa Lemos da Silva; Amanda de Sousa Rebouças; Beatriz Maria Alves Mendonça; Danna Calina Nogueira E Silva; Roberto Dimenstein; Karla Danielly da Silva Ribeiro Journal: Matern Child Nutr Date: 2019-01-30 Impact factor: 3.092
Authors: James R Hébert; Thomas G Hurley; Brook E Harmon; Sue Heiney; Christine J Hebert; Susan E Steck Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Date: 2011-10-20 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: James R Hébert; Thomas G Hurley; Susan E Steck; Donald R Miller; Fred K Tabung; Lawrence H Kushi; Edward A Frongillo Journal: Adv Nutr Date: 2015-03-13 Impact factor: 8.701
Authors: Madeline Grandy; Jonathan M Snowden; Janne Boone-Heinonen; Jonathan Q Purnell; Kent L Thornburg; Nicole E Marshall Journal: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med Date: 2017-05-18
Authors: Kyungcheol Choy; Sarah H Nash; Alan R Kristal; Scarlett Hopkins; Bert B Boyer; Diane M O'Brien Journal: J Nutr Date: 2013-04-24 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Dale S Bond; Kevin C O'Leary; J Graham Thomas; Richard B Lipton; George D Papandonatos; Julie Roth; Lucille Rathier; Richard Daniello; Rena R Wing Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2013-03-22 Impact factor: 2.226