Jason Gardosi1, Andre Francis. 1. West Midlands Perinatal Institute, Birmingham, England, UK. jason.gardosi@pi.nhs.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to investigate the association between pregnancy complications and small for gestational age (SGA) birthweight, comparing SGA based on the customized growth potential with SGA based on the birthweight standard of the same population. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective analysis of a database from a US multicenter study. Pregnancy complications included threatened preterm labor, antepartum hemorrhage, pregnancy-induced hypertension, preeclampsia, stillbirth, and early neonatal death. RESULTS: Compared with SGA by the birthweight standard, SGA by customized growth potential showed higher risk for each of the 6 adverse indicators. A third of the SGA group was small by customized centiles but not by population-based centiles, yet was strongly associated with each of the pregnancy complications studied. This subgroup of unrecognized SGA babies included 26% preterm deliveries. In contrast, a subgroup that was SGA by the population standard but not by the customized standard (17.2%), was not associated with any of the indicators of adverse outcome. CONCLUSION: SGA defined by customized growth potential improves the differentiation between physiologically and pathologically small babies.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to investigate the association between pregnancy complications and small for gestational age (SGA) birthweight, comparing SGA based on the customized growth potential with SGA based on the birthweight standard of the same population. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective analysis of a database from a US multicenter study. Pregnancy complications included threatened preterm labor, antepartum hemorrhage, pregnancy-induced hypertension, preeclampsia, stillbirth, and early neonatal death. RESULTS: Compared with SGA by the birthweight standard, SGA by customized growth potential showed higher risk for each of the 6 adverse indicators. A third of the SGA group was small by customized centiles but not by population-based centiles, yet was strongly associated with each of the pregnancy complications studied. This subgroup of unrecognized SGA babies included 26% preterm deliveries. In contrast, a subgroup that was SGA by the population standard but not by the customized standard (17.2%), was not associated with any of the indicators of adverse outcome. CONCLUSION: SGA defined by customized growth potential improves the differentiation between physiologically and pathologically small babies.
Authors: Maged M Costantine; Lisa Mele; Mark B Landon; Catherine Y Spong; Susan M Ramin; Brian Casey; Ronald J Wapner; Michael W Varner; Dwight J Rouse; John M Thorp; Anthony Sciscione; Patrick Catalano; Steve N Caritis; Yoram Sorokin; Alan M Peaceman; Jorge E Tolosa; Garland D Anderson Journal: Am J Perinatol Date: 2012-11-12 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Nir Melamed; Ahmet Baschat; Yoav Yinon; Apostolos Athanasiadis; Federico Mecacci; Francesc Figueras; Vincenzo Berghella; Amala Nazareth; Muna Tahlak; H David McIntyre; Fabrício Da Silva Costa; Anne B Kihara; Eran Hadar; Fionnuala McAuliffe; Mark Hanson; Ronald C Ma; Rachel Gooden; Eyal Sheiner; Anil Kapur; Hema Divakar; Diogo Ayres-de-Campos; Liran Hiersch; Liona C Poon; John Kingdom; Roberto Romero; Moshe Hod Journal: Int J Gynaecol Obstet Date: 2021-03 Impact factor: 3.561
Authors: Lisa M Bodnar; Janet M Catov; Joseph M Zmuda; Margaret E Cooper; Meredith S Parrott; James M Roberts; Mary L Marazita; Hyagriv N Simhan Journal: J Nutr Date: 2010-03-03 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Maged M Costantine; Yinglei Lai; Steven L Bloom; Catherine Y Spong; Michael W Varner; Dwight J Rouse; Susan M Ramin; Steve N Caritis; Alan M Peaceman; Yoram Sorokin; Anthony Sciscione; Brian M Mercer; John M Thorp; Fergal D Malone; Margaret Harper; Jay D Iams Journal: Am J Perinatol Date: 2012-08-14 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Donald J Dudley; Robert Goldenberg; Deborah Conway; Robert M Silver; George R Saade; Michael W Varner; Halit Pinar; Donald Coustan; Radek Bukowski; Barbara Stoll; Matthew A Koch; Corette B Parker; Uma M Reddy Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: William A Grobman; Yinglei Lai; Dwight J Rouse; Catherine Y Spong; Michael W Varner; Brian M Mercer; Kenneth J Leveno; Jay D Iams; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; John M Thorp; Susan M Ramin; Fergal D Malone; Mary J O'Sullivan; Gary D V Hankins; Steve N Caritis Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2013-06-13 Impact factor: 8.661