Literature DB >> 19575685

Short-term natural history of the standard approaches for gastrostomy tube placement in the pediatric patient.

Jason D Fraser1, Todd A Ponsky, Pablo Aguayo, Scott Boulanger, Robert Parry, Neil Nixdorf, Jennifer DiLuciano, Patti Smith, Susan W Sharp, George W Holcomb, Daniel J Ostlie, Shawn D St Peter.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Gastrostomy placement is a common procedure in the pediatric population. Standard approaches of tube placement include open, laparoscopic, and percutaneous endoscopic methods. Placement of the gastrostomy in relation to the fundus and the anterior abdominal wall is crucial to ensure adequate comfort and functionality. Misplacement may require repositioning of the gastrostomy, the rate of which has not been well documented. We, therefore, have reviewed a multi-institutional experience with gastrostomy tube placement to determine the short-term natural history of placement, based on approach, and to establish a cohort to determine the long-term natural history.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all pediatric patients who underwent percutaneous endoscopic, laparoscopic, or open gastrostomy placement at two institutions from 2000 to 2008.
RESULTS: There were a total of 1534 patients who underwent gastrostomy tube placement during this time period. The most common procedure was fundoplication with gastrostomy (N = 832), followed by gastrostomy alone (N = 420), and then percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) (N = 285). There were 4 (0.3%) gastrostomy tubes that required repositioning to a new site due to encroachment upon the rib margin. Two were open and 2 were PEG (P > 0.99). Twenty of 39 patients who had an open fundoplication following gastrostomy had the gastrostomy taken down during the procedure, compared to 5 of 31 patients (P = 0.03), who underwent laparoscopic fundoplication following gastrostomy.
CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that the need for gastrostomy tube repositioning is rare in the short term, regardless of approach, although a takedown of the gastrostomy is more likely when an open fundoplication is performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19575685     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2009.0120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  5 in total

1.  Outcome of laparoscopic versus open gastrostomy in children.

Authors:  Gertrud Angsten; Johan Danielson; Ann-Marie Kassa; Helene Engstrand Lilja
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 2.  Fundoplication with gastrostomy vs gastrostomy alone: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes and complications.

Authors:  Brendan K Y Yap; Shireen Anne Nah; Yong Chen; Yee Low
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2016-11-26       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  Severe gastro-oesophageal reflux necessitating fundoplication after percutaneous endoscopic and open gastrostomy in children.

Authors:  Hannu Lintula; Petri Juvonen; Inka Hämynen; Markku Heikkinen; Matti Eskelinen
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Button Gastrostomy Tubes for Pediatric Patients: A Tertiary Care Center Experience.

Authors:  Fayza Haider; Hasan Mohamed Ali Isa; Mohamed Amin Al Awadhi; Barrak Ayoub; Ezat Bakhsh; Husain Al Aradi; Shahraban Abdulla Juma
Journal:  Int J Pediatr       Date:  2020-10-08

5.  Laparoscopic versus percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement in children: Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nutnicha Suksamanapun; Femke A Mauritz; Josephine Franken; David C van der Zee; Maud Ya van Herwaarden-Lindeboom
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.407

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.