Gertrud Angsten1, Johan Danielson1, Ann-Marie Kassa1, Helene Engstrand Lilja2,3. 1. Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, SE-751 85, Uppsala, Sweden. 2. Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, SE-751 85, Uppsala, Sweden. helene.lilja@kbh.uu.se. 3. Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Children's Hospital, SE-751 85, Uppsala, Sweden. helene.lilja@kbh.uu.se.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Laparoscopic gastrostomy (LAPG) has gained popularity in children. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of LAPG versus open gastrostomy (OG) in children with focus on complications, operative times and postoperative length of stay. METHODS: Retrospective study of children who had gastrostomies inserted at our tertiary Pediatric Surgery Center from 2000 until 2013. The indications for a gastrostomy were an anticipated need for enteral support for at least 6 months. Totally 243 children were included in the study, 83 with LAPG and 160 with OG. RESULTS: We found a significant difference in postoperative length of stay, 3 days in the LAPG group versus 4 days in the OG group but no difference in a sub-group analysis from 2010 to 2013 when both techniques were used. There was no difference in median operative time or complications rates. Granuloma was the dominating complication in both groups. CONCLUSION: These two feeding-access techniques are comparable regarding complications, operative times and postoperative length of stay. The choice of surgical method should be individualized based on the patient's characteristics and the experience of the surgeon. The favorable results with LAPG in adults are not necessarily transferable to children since there are physiological and anatomical differences.
PURPOSE: Laparoscopic gastrostomy (LAPG) has gained popularity in children. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of LAPG versus open gastrostomy (OG) in children with focus on complications, operative times and postoperative length of stay. METHODS: Retrospective study of children who had gastrostomies inserted at our tertiary Pediatric Surgery Center from 2000 until 2013. The indications for a gastrostomy were an anticipated need for enteral support for at least 6 months. Totally 243 children were included in the study, 83 with LAPG and 160 with OG. RESULTS: We found a significant difference in postoperative length of stay, 3 days in the LAPG group versus 4 days in the OG group but no difference in a sub-group analysis from 2010 to 2013 when both techniques were used. There was no difference in median operative time or complications rates. Granuloma was the dominating complication in both groups. CONCLUSION: These two feeding-access techniques are comparable regarding complications, operative times and postoperative length of stay. The choice of surgical method should be individualized based on the patient's characteristics and the experience of the surgeon. The favorable results with LAPG in adults are not necessarily transferable to children since there are physiological and anatomical differences.
Entities:
Keywords:
Children; Gastrostomy; Laparoscopic gastrostomy; Open gastrostomy
Authors: Begum Akay; Tony R Capizzani; Alice M Lee; Robert A Drongowski; James D Geiger; Ronald B Hirschl; George B Mychaliska Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: Charles J Aprahamian; Traci L Morgan; Carroll M Harmon; Keith E Georgeson; Douglas C Barnhart Journal: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 1.878
Authors: Josephine Franken; Femke A Mauritz; Nutnicha Suksamanapun; Caroline C C Hulsker; David C van der Zee; Maud Y A van Herwaarden-Lindeboom Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2014-10-08 Impact factor: 4.584