Literature DB >> 19572798

Scientific and technical advances in continence recovery following radical prostatectomy.

Gerald Y Tan1, Youssef El Douaihy, Alexis E Te, Ashutosh K Tewari.   

Abstract

The advent of prostate-specific antigen screening has changed the global epidemiology of prostate cancer, with men being diagnosed with organ-confined cancer at a younger age. Radical prostatectomy with curative intent for these patients, while delivering excellent long-term survival outcomes, still has significant side effects, chiefly postprostatectomy incontinence. Increasing age, shorter pre- and post-operative membranous urethral length, anastomotic strictures, obesity, low surgeon volume, variations of surgical technique and previous prostate surgery have been reported as negative risk factors for delayed continence recovery and/or permanent incontinence following radical prostatectomy. Significant progress in elucidating the functional anatomy and physiology of the male continence mechanism from cadaveric and videourodynamic studies have enabled surgeons to propose innovative surgical techniques during radical prostatectomy for augmenting continence preservation and early return. These have included optimizing the preservation of urethral rhabdosphincter length; avoiding rhabdosphincter injury; posterior reconstruction of Denonvilliers' musculofascial plate; preservation of the bladder neck and internal sphincter; bladder neck intussusception; bladder neck mucosal eversion; preservation of the puboprostatic ligaments and arcus tendineus; and preservation of putative nerves supplying the continence mechanism. We review the scientific and technical advances in continence recovery following radical prostatectomy, identify the key principles undergirding early return of continence, highlight various treatment strategies for early and refractory postprostatectomy incontinence and describe our experience with a paradigm of these unified key principles. Increasing application of these principles in computer-aided (robotic), minimally invasive and minimal-access (i.e., single-port or natural orifice transluminal) approaches will hopefully enable patients to derive maximal benefit from curative prostatectomy while experiencing early return of continence in the not too distant future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19572798     DOI: 10.1586/erd.09.19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices        ISSN: 1743-4440            Impact factor:   3.166


  5 in total

Review 1.  Optimizing radical prostatectomy for the early recovery of urinary continence.

Authors:  Harveer S Dev; Prasanna Sooriakumaran; Abhishek Srivastava; Ashutosh K Tewari
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Development and validation of nomograms to predict the recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy: comparisons between immediate, early, and late continence.

Authors:  Seong Jin Jeong; Jae Seung Yeon; Jeong Keun Lee; Woo Heon Cha; Jin Woo Jeong; Byung Ki Lee; Sang Cheol Lee; Chang Wook Jeong; Jeong Hyun Kim; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Contemporary trends in radical prostatectomy and predictors of recovery of urinary continence in men aged over 70 years: comparisons between cohorts aged over 70 and less than 70 years.

Authors:  Young Ju Lee; Jin-Woo Jung; Sangchul Lee; Sang Wook Lee; Jeong Hyun Kim; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Sang Eun Lee; Seong Jin Jeong
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2020 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  Early continence recovery after preservation of maximal urethral length until the level of verumontanum during radical prostatectomy: primary oncological and functional outcomes after 1 year of follow-up.

Authors:  Stavros Sfoungaristos; Stavros Kontogiannis; Petros Perimenis
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Evaluation of a 3D system based on a high-quality flat screen and polarized glasses for use by surgical assistants during robotic surgery.

Authors:  Kazushi Tanaka; Katsumi Shigemura; Takeshi Ishimura; Mototsugu Muramaki; Hideaki Miyake; Masato Fujisawa
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2014-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.