Literature DB >> 19572134

[Health-economic aspects of glaucoma screening].

C Hirneiss1, A Niedermaier, M Kernt, A Kampik, A S Neubauer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Screening for glaucoma can detect undiagnosed patients, and treatment can prevent blindness. There are defined criteria for screening programs, but economic aspects of screening programs and cost utility estimations are of increasing importance.
METHODS: Medical databases (CDSR, HTA, MEDLINE, EMBASE) were searched on the topics of glaucoma screening, screening strategies and tools, and relevant health-economic analyses for glaucoma screening. In this article, the most important findings are presented and discussed using epidemiological data.
RESULTS: Glaucoma screening meets most of the relevant criteria for screening strategies. The best single screening test at this time is the frequency doubling technique. The cost-effectiveness depends mainly on the prevalence of the disease, the specificity of the screening test, the costs of screening and disease, and the impairment of quality of life due to glaucoma. Two recently published cost utility studies from Finland and the United Kingdom are presented. A common result is that a population screening is not cost-effective, whereas targeted screening of high-risk groups is.
CONCLUSION: Glaucoma screening of the general population is not cost-effective, but screening of groups at risk (e.g., those of a certain age, family history, or ethnicity) may be cost-effective. Clear cutoff points regarding whom to screen can be determined by economic analyses using high-quality data. These data influence health policy decision makers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19572134     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-009-1983-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  26 in total

1.  Accuracy of scanning laser polarimetry, scanning laser tomography, and their combination in a glaucoma screening trial.

Authors:  Márta Tóth; Péter Kóthy; Gábor Holló
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Glaucoma detection using the GDx nerve fiber analyzer and the retinal thickness analyzer (RTA).

Authors:  E M Hoffmann; C Bowd; N Klein; K Stemberger; F H Grus; N Pfeiffer
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.597

3.  Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer and optic disc imaging for diagnosing glaucoma in patients suspected of having the disease.

Authors:  Felipe A Medeiros; Gianmarco Vizzeri; Linda M Zangwill; Luciana M Alencar; Pamela A Sample; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  The impact of anchor point on utilities for 5 common ophthalmic diseases.

Authors:  Bryan S Lee; Steven M Kymes; Robert F Nease; Walton Sumner; Carla J Siegfried; Mae O Gordon
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020.

Authors:  H A Quigley; A T Broman
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 6.  Screening tests for detecting open-angle glaucoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Graham Mowatt; Jennifer M Burr; Jonathan A Cook; M A Rehman Siddiqui; Craig Ramsay; Cynthia Fraser; Augusto Azuara-Blanco; Jonathan J Deeks
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Evaluation of quality of life and priorities of patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  Peter A Aspinall; Zoe K Johnson; Augusto Azuara-Blanco; Alicia Montarzino; Roger Brice; Adrian Vickers
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  [Measuring patient's quality of life in ophthalmology].

Authors:  C Hirneiss; A S Neubauer; U Welge-Lüssen; K Eibl; A Kampik
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.059

9.  The probability of blindness from open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  M G Hattenhauer; D H Johnson; H H Ing; D C Herman; D O Hodge; B P Yawn; L C Butterfield; D T Gray
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  [Glaucoma and quality of life].

Authors:  X Zanlonghi; B Arnould; A Bechetoille; C Baudouin; A Bron; P Denis; J-P Nordmann; J-P Renard; M-C Rigeade; J-F Rouland; E Sellem
Journal:  J Fr Ophtalmol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 0.818

View more
  4 in total

1.  [Glaucoma diseases in Rhineland-Palatine 2010. Epidemiology and utilization of healthcare].

Authors:  C Wolfram; N Pfeiffer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  [Screening in ophthalmology : Stay healthy, recognize diseases early].

Authors:  A S Neubauer; C W Hirneiß
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  [Outcomes and health services research in ophthalmology].

Authors:  C Wolfram; N Pfeiffer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  The 2-global flash mfERG in glaucoma: attempting to increase sensitivity by reducing the focal flash luminance and changing filter settings.

Authors:  S A Kramer; A A Ledolter; M G Todorova; A Schötzau; S Orgül; A M Palmowski-Wolfe
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 2.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.