Literature DB >> 19571097

Determination of correct implant size in radial head arthroplasty to avoid overlengthening.

Simon G Frank1, Ruby Grewal, James Johnson, Kenneth J Faber, Graham J W King, George S Athwal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Insertion of a radial head implant that results in radial overlengthening has been associated with altered elbow kinematics, increased radiocapitellar joint forces, capitellar erosions, early-onset arthritis, and loss of elbow flexion. The purpose of this study was to identify clinical and radiographic features that may be used to diagnose overlengthening of the radius intraoperatively and on postoperative radiographs.
METHODS: Radial head implants of varying thicknesses were inserted into seven cadaver specimens, which were then assessed clinically and radiographically. Eight stages were examined: the intact specimen (stage 1); repair of the lateral collateral ligament (stage 2); radial head resection with repair of the lateral collateral ligament (stage 3); insertion of an implant of the correct thickness (stage 4); and insertion of an implant that resulted in radial overlengthening of 2 mm (stage 5), 4 mm (stage 6), 6 mm (stage 7), or 8 mm (stage 8). The specimens were tested with and without muscle loading to simulate resting muscle tone and surgical paralysis, respectively. At each stage, radiographs were made to measure the ulnohumeral joint space and the lateral ulnohumeral joint was visually assessed.
RESULTS: We identified no difference, with regard to medial ulnohumeral joint incongruity as seen radiographically, among stages 1 through 6 during the tests with muscle loading. A significant difference in medial ulnohumeral joint incongruity was found in stages 7 (p = 0.003) and 8 (p < 0.001). The clinical (visually assessed) lateral ulnohumeral joint space gap was negligible in stages 1 through 4 but increased significantly at all stages involving overlengthening (gross gap, 0.9 mm with 2 mm of overlengthening [p = 0.005], 2.3 mm with 4 mm of overlengthening [p < 0.001], 3.4 mm with 6 mm [p < 0.001], and 4.7 mm with 8 mm [p < 0.001]).
CONCLUSIONS: Incongruity of the medial ulnohumeral joint becomes apparent radiographically only after overlengthening of the radius by >or=6 mm. Intraoperative visualization of a gap in the lateral ulnohumeral joint is a reliable indicator of overlengthening following the insertion of a radial head prosthesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19571097     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  19 in total

1.  [Endoprosthetics of the radial column after trauma].

Authors:  M C Müller; T Kälicke; C Burger; O Weber
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  [Endoprosthetics of acute radial head fractures].

Authors:  K J Burkhart; K Wegmann; C Ries; L P Müller
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Anthropometric study of the proximal radius: does radial head implant fit in all cases?

Authors:  Soo Hwan Kang; Dong Yeop Kim; Hyunwoo Park; Hyun Seok Song
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Causes for early and late surgical re-intervention after radial head arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pierre Laumonerie; David Ancelin; Nicolas Reina; Meagan E Tibbo; Panagiotis Kerezoudis; Stephanie Delclaux; Nicolas Bonnevialle; Pierre Mansat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Comminuted radial head fractures treated with pyrocarbon prosthetic replacement.

Authors:  Claudia Lamas; Juan Castellanos; Ignacio Proubasta; Enrique Dominguez
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2010-06-15

Review 6.  [Primary radial head arthroplasty in trauma : Complications].

Authors:  K Schmidt-Horlohé; S Buschbeck; D Wincheringer; M Weißenberger; R Hoffmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 7.  Radial head prosthesis: surgical tips and tricks.

Authors:  A Marinelli; E Guerra; A Ritali; M Cavallo; R Rotini
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-10-09

8.  Monobloc radial head prostheses in complex elbow injuries: results after primary and secondary implantation.

Authors:  Jan Christoph Katthagen; Gunnar Jensen; Helmut Lill; Christine Voigt
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 9.  [Post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the elbow joint : Endoprosthetic options in young patients].

Authors:  A Lenich; A B Imhoff; S Siebenlist
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Treatment of radial head and neck fractures: in favor of anatomical reconstruction.

Authors:  K J Burkhart; K Wegmann; J Dargel; C Ries; L P Mueller
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 3.693

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.