Literature DB >> 19570805

Affy exon tissues: exon levels in normal tissues in human, mouse and rat.

Andrew A Pohl1, Charles W Sugnet, Tyson A Clark, Kayla Smith, Pauline A Fujita, Melissa S Cline.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: Most genes in human, mouse and rat produce more than one transcript isoform. The Affymetrix Exon Array is a tool for studying the many processes that regulate RNA production, with separate probesets measuring RNA levels at known and putative exons. For insights on how exons levels vary between normal tissues, we constructed the Affy Exon Tissues track from tissue data published by Affymetrix. This track reports exon probeset intensities as log ratios relative to median values across the dataset and renders them as colored heat maps, to yield quick visual identification of exons with intensities that vary between normal tissues. AVAILABILITY: Affy Exon Tissues track is freely available under the UCSC Genome Browser (http://genome.ucsc.edu/) for human (hg18), mouse (mm8 and mm9), and rat (rn4).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19570805      PMCID: PMC2735668          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


1 INTRODUCTION

The mammalian transcriptome is complex. By recent estimates, as many as 94% of human genes undergo alternative splicing (Wang, et al., 2008). Alternative splicing is consequential as well as frequent, with effects ranging from altering protein structure to targeting mRNA for early decay (Hartmann and Valcarcel, 2009). Furthermore, mammalian genomes contain an abundance of non-coding RNA genes (Chu and Rana, 2007). In short, to understand the consequences of transcription, one must look beyond overall expression levels of known genes. Affymetrix exon arrays facilitate transcriptome analysis with probesets that measure RNA abundance for individual exons, conserved genomic regions, and blocks from syntenic alignments (see http://www.affymetrix.com/support/technical/technotes/exon_array_design_technote.pdf). These arrays have offered new insights on how transcript isoforms may be influenced by a myriad of factors including tissue type (Clark et al., 2007), genetic variation (Kwan et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2009), differentiation (Yeo et al., 2007), and disease (Soreq et al., 2008; Thorsen et al., 2008). Alternative splicing can arise through normal, regulated processes; or through abnormalities such as mutation, disease, and environmental stress (Yeo et al., 2005). Before one can understand the abnormal conditions, it is valuable to understand the scope of normal alternative splicing by comparing splicing patterns between normal tissues. To facilitate this, we have provided the Affy Exon Tissues tracks in the UCSC Genome Browser (Kuhn et al., 2009), depicting exon probeset intensities in normal tissues in human, mouse, and rat.

2 DESCRIPTION

The Affy Exon Tissues track consists of two parts: genomic coordinates of the exon array probesets; and a heat map indicating exon probeset intensities in normal tissues, based on data available from http://www.affymetrix.com/support/technical/sample_data/exon_array_data.affx. Briefly, normal tissues were assayed in triplicate, and were analyzed with the Affymetrix Power Tools software (http://www.affymetrix.com/partners_programs/programs/developer/tools/powertools.affx) to produce normalized, background-corrected probeset intensities. For each probeset, we computed its median intensity for each tissue, and then the median of these median values. For each experiment, we calculated the log ratio between the probeset intensity and this median value. For numeric stability, we added a fixed, background-level pseudocount to each observation, which also renders probesets with no expression as constant-valued. The genome browser renders these log ratios as blue–white–red (shown), green–red, or yellow–blue heat maps, with the color selection controlled via the track's details page. Additional details are provided in the Supplementary Material. Figure 1a shows the Affy Exon Tissues track for TPM2 in mm9. The constitutive exons (those included in all transcripts) indicate that TPM2 is expressed most strongly in muscle and embryo, with some expression in ovary. TPM2 has a well-documented pattern of tissue-dependent splicing, with one isoform produced in skeletal muscle tissue and another in non-muscle tissue (Gooding and Smith, 2008). This pattern is apparent in the two mutually-exclusive exons (third and fourth from the left): one is highly-expressed (red) in muscle and embryo (a heterogeneous tissue), while the other is highly-expressed in ovary.
Fig. 1.

(a) The Affy Exon Tissues track demonstrates tissue-dependent splicing of two mutually exclusive exons (third and fourth from the left) in the mm9 TPM2 locus. Red indicates probesets that are up-regulated relative to median levels, while blue indicates down-regulated probesets. The constitutive exons (those included in all transcripts: first, second and fifth from the left) offer perspectives on overall gene expression, and indicate that the gene is up-regulated (red) in embryo, muscle and ovary. The leftmost mutually-exclusive exon appears upregulated in embryo and muscle, while the second appears upregulated in ovary. The remaining two probesets, which map to no known exons, are rendered mostly white. This indicates no variation in their expression levels, and suggests that they are not expressed in these tissues. (b) A probeset was designed for this unannotated region in mm9 based on more-speculative evidence such as genomic conservation or ab initio exon prediction. This region shows evidence of up-regulation (red) in brain, suggesting production of a brain-specific transcript.

(a) The Affy Exon Tissues track demonstrates tissue-dependent splicing of two mutually exclusive exons (third and fourth from the left) in the mm9 TPM2 locus. Red indicates probesets that are up-regulated relative to median levels, while blue indicates down-regulated probesets. The constitutive exons (those included in all transcripts: first, second and fifth from the left) offer perspectives on overall gene expression, and indicate that the gene is up-regulated (red) in embryo, muscle and ovary. The leftmost mutually-exclusive exon appears upregulated in embryo and muscle, while the second appears upregulated in ovary. The remaining two probesets, which map to no known exons, are rendered mostly white. This indicates no variation in their expression levels, and suggests that they are not expressed in these tissues. (b) A probeset was designed for this unannotated region in mm9 based on more-speculative evidence such as genomic conservation or ab initio exon prediction. This region shows evidence of up-regulation (red) in brain, suggesting production of a brain-specific transcript. For contrast, Figure 1b shows an unannotated conserved region on chromosome 1 in mm9. While it does not overlap with any known gene, its red (up-regulated) log intensity in brain suggests brain-specific expression. This illustrates how this data can offer insights on regions with no annotation but strong conservation.

3 CONCLUSION

The Affy Exon Tissues track displays exon probeset intensities in human, mouse, and rat tissues, including breast, cerebellum, heart, kidney, liver, muscle, pancreas, prostate, spleen, testes, and thyroid. In contrast to traditional microarray tracks such as the GNF Expression Atlas (Su et al., 2004), which provide one measure of overall expression per gene and cannot report any transcript variation, the Affy Exon Tissues track offers the ability to compare intensities of neighboring probesets and observe alternative promoter usage, polyadenylation, and splicing. Exon probeset intensities are rendered as heat maps to offer rapid visual identification of exons that vary under normal cellular conditions. Besides the Affy Exon Tissues track, the UCSC Genome Browser currently hosts the hg18 Sestan Brain exon expression track, which contrasts exon probeset intensities between sections of the brain (Johnson et al., 2009). This set of tracks may expand further as additional datasets become available, offering further insights into transcript variation in the mammalian genomes.
  14 in total

1.  Heritability of alternative splicing in the human genome.

Authors:  Tony Kwan; David Benovoy; Christel Dias; Scott Gurd; David Serre; Harry Zuzan; Tyson A Clark; Anthony Schweitzer; Michelle K Staples; Hui Wang; John E Blume; Thomas J Hudson; Rob Sladek; Jacek Majewski
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Identification and analysis of alternative splicing events conserved in human and mouse.

Authors:  Gene W Yeo; Eric Van Nostrand; Dirk Holste; Tomaso Poggio; Christopher B Burge
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Small RNAs: regulators and guardians of the genome.

Authors:  Chia-Ying Chu; Tariq M Rana
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 6.384

Review 4.  Decrypting the genome's alternative messages.

Authors:  Britta Hartmann; Juan Valcárcel
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 8.382

5.  A gene atlas of the mouse and human protein-encoding transcriptomes.

Authors:  Andrew I Su; Tim Wiltshire; Serge Batalov; Hilmar Lapp; Keith A Ching; David Block; Jie Zhang; Richard Soden; Mimi Hayakawa; Gabriel Kreiman; Michael P Cooke; John R Walker; John B Hogenesch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-04-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Alternative splicing in colon, bladder, and prostate cancer identified by exon array analysis.

Authors:  Kasper Thorsen; Karina D Sørensen; Anne Sofie Brems-Eskildsen; Charlotte Modin; Mette Gaustadnes; Anne-Mette K Hein; Mogens Kruhøffer; Søren Laurberg; Michael Borre; Kai Wang; Søren Brunak; Adrian R Krainer; Niels Tørring; Lars Dyrskjøt; Claus L Andersen; Torben F Orntoft
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 5.911

7.  Alternative isoform regulation in human tissue transcriptomes.

Authors:  Eric T Wang; Rickard Sandberg; Shujun Luo; Irina Khrebtukova; Lu Zhang; Christine Mayr; Stephen F Kingsmore; Gary P Schroth; Christopher B Burge
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The UCSC Genome Browser Database: update 2009.

Authors:  R M Kuhn; D Karolchik; A S Zweig; T Wang; K E Smith; K R Rosenbloom; B Rhead; B J Raney; A Pohl; M Pheasant; L Meyer; F Hsu; A S Hinrichs; R A Harte; B Giardine; P Fujita; M Diekhans; T Dreszer; H Clawson; G P Barber; D Haussler; W J Kent
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Discovery and analysis of evolutionarily conserved intronic splicing regulatory elements.

Authors:  Gene W Yeo; Eric L Van Nostrand; Eric L Van Nostrand; Tiffany Y Liang
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Discovery of tissue-specific exons using comprehensive human exon microarrays.

Authors:  Tyson A Clark; Anthony C Schweitzer; Tina X Chen; Michelle K Staples; Gang Lu; Hui Wang; Alan Williams; John E Blume
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  10 in total

1.  Lineage-specific duplications of Muroidea Faim and Spag6 genes and atypical accelerated evolution of the parental Spag6 gene.

Authors:  Huan Qiu; Aniela Gołas; Paweł Grzmil; Leszek Wojnowski
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  A bioinformatic and computational study of myosin phosphatase subunit diversity.

Authors:  Rachael P Dippold; Steven A Fisher
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  New families of human regulatory RNA structures identified by comparative analysis of vertebrate genomes.

Authors:  Brian J Parker; Ida Moltke; Adam Roth; Stefan Washietl; Jiayu Wen; Manolis Kellis; Ronald Breaker; Jakob Skou Pedersen
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Bidirectional promoters as important drivers for the emergence of species-specific transcripts.

Authors:  Valer Gotea; Hanna M Petrykowska; Laura Elnitski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A novel isoform of MAP4 organises the paraxial microtubule array required for muscle cell differentiation.

Authors:  Binyam Mogessie; Daniel Roth; Zainab Rahil; Anne Straube
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  AVISPA: a web tool for the prediction and analysis of alternative splicing.

Authors:  Yoseph Barash; Jorge Vaquero-Garcia; Juan González-Vallinas; Hui Yuan Xiong; Weijun Gao; Leo J Lee; Brendan J Frey
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 13.583

7.  Epigenetics of the myotonic dystrophy-associated DMPK gene neighborhood.

Authors:  Lauren Buckley; Michelle Lacey; Melanie Ehrlich
Journal:  Epigenomics       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 4.778

8.  Nested retrotransposition in the East Asian mouse genome causes the classical nonagouti mutation.

Authors:  Akira Tanave; Yuji Imai; Tsuyoshi Koide
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2019-08-02

9.  Large, male germ cell-specific hypomethylated DNA domains with unique genomic and epigenomic features on the mouse X chromosome.

Authors:  Rieko Ikeda; Hirosuke Shiura; Koji Numata; Michihiko Sugimoto; Masayo Kondo; Nathan Mise; Masako Suzuki; John M Greally; Kuniya Abe
Journal:  DNA Res       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 4.458

10.  Systematic biases in DNA copy number originate from isolation procedures.

Authors:  Sebastiaan van Heesch; Michal Mokry; Veronika Boskova; Wade Junker; Rajdeep Mehon; Pim Toonen; Ewart de Bruijn; James D Shull; Timothy J Aitman; Edwin Cuppen; Victor Guryev
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 13.583

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.