CONTEXT: A well-suited e-learning program might be a feasible strategy to maintain competence following a resuscitation course. AIM: This study had 2 aims: (1) to examine the effect of an e-learning program as a booster of competence acquired from an Advanced Life Support (ALS) course. (2) To identify factors related to the use of the e-learning program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study contained two parts pertaining to the two aims. The first part was a prospective single blinded randomised controlled study on junior doctors. The intervention was the monthly use of an e-learning program during one year and effect was measured as ALS-competence, a composite of a knowledge and skills test. The second part was a telephone interview of the intervention group. An interview guide was constructed based on existing knowledge of e-learning. In order to identify factors explaining the use of e-learning a univariate correlation was used to select significant variables to be included in a multiple regression analysis. RESULTS:Of the 134 invited to participate, 103 accepted the invitation. There were 79/103 (77%) participants, 40/51 in the intervention group and 39/52 in the control group. There was no difference between the groups with regards to ALS competence. Only 'social interaction' was an individually significant factor influencing the use of the e-learning program. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not demonstrate an effect of an e-learning program as a booster of competence acquired from an ALS course. The primary factor influencing the use of e-learning was the lack of social interaction.
RCT Entities:
CONTEXT: A well-suited e-learning program might be a feasible strategy to maintain competence following a resuscitation course. AIM: This study had 2 aims: (1) to examine the effect of an e-learning program as a booster of competence acquired from an Advanced Life Support (ALS) course. (2) To identify factors related to the use of the e-learning program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study contained two parts pertaining to the two aims. The first part was a prospective single blinded randomised controlled study on junior doctors. The intervention was the monthly use of an e-learning program during one year and effect was measured as ALS-competence, a composite of a knowledge and skills test. The second part was a telephone interview of the intervention group. An interview guide was constructed based on existing knowledge of e-learning. In order to identify factors explaining the use of e-learning a univariate correlation was used to select significant variables to be included in a multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: Of the 134 invited to participate, 103 accepted the invitation. There were 79/103 (77%) participants, 40/51 in the intervention group and 39/52 in the control group. There was no difference between the groups with regards to ALS competence. Only 'social interaction' was an individually significant factor influencing the use of the e-learning program. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not demonstrate an effect of an e-learning program as a booster of competence acquired from an ALS course. The primary factor influencing the use of e-learning was the lack of social interaction.
Authors: Andrzej A Kononowicz; Paweł Krawczyk; Grzegorz Cebula; Marta Dembkowska; Edyta Drab; Bartosz Frączek; Aleksandra J Stachoń; Janusz Andres Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2012-06-18 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Charlotte Loumann Krogh; Jacob Steinmetz; Søren Steemann Rudolph; Rasmus Hesselfeldt; Freddy K Lippert; Peter A Berlac; Lars S Rasmussen Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2016-08-04 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Hayfaa Abdelmageed Wahabi; Samia Ahmed Esmaeil; Khawater Hassan Bahkali; Maher Abdelraheim Titi; Yasser Sami Amer; Amel Ahmed Fayed; Amr Jamal; Nasriah Zakaria; Amna Rehana Siddiqui; Monika Semwal; Lorainne Tudor Car; Paul Posadzki; Josip Car Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Charlotte Loumann Krogh; Charlotte Ringsted; Charles B Kromann; Maria Birkvad Rasmussen; Tobias Todsen; Rasmus Lundhus Jørgensen; Rikke Borre Jacobsen; Jørgen B Dahl; Lars Konge Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2014-05-20 Impact factor: 3.411