Literature DB >> 19569937

Using lamina screws as a salvage technique at C-7: computed tomography and biomechanical analysis using cadaveric vertebrae. Laboratory investigation.

Mario J Cardoso1, Anton E Dmitriev, Melvin D Helgeson, Frederick Stephens, Victoria Campbell, Ronald A Lehman, Patrick Cooper, Michael K Rosner.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Transpedicular instrumentation at C-7 has been well accepted, but salvage techniques are limited. Lamina screws have been shown to be a biomechanically sound salvage technique in the proximal thoracic spine, but have not been evaluated in the lower cervical spine. The following study evaluates the anatomical feasibility of lamina screws at C-7 as well as their bone-screw interface strength as a salvage technique.
METHODS: Nine fresh-frozen C-7 cadaveric specimens were scanned for bone mineral density using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Prior to testing, all specimens were imaged using CT to obtain 1-mm axial sections. Caliper measurements of both pedicle width and laminar thickness were obtained. On the right side, pedicle screws were first inserted and then pulled out. Salvage intralaminar screws were inserted into the left lamina from the right spinous process/lamina junction and then pulled out. All screws were placed by experienced cervical spine surgeons under direct fluoroscopic visualization. Pedicle and lamina screws were 4.35- and 3.5-mm in diameter, respectively. Screws sizes were chosen based on direct and radiographic measurements of the respective anatomical regions. Insertional torque (IT) was measured in pounds per inch. Tensile loading to failure was performed in-line with the screw axis at a rate of 0.25 mm/sec using a MiniBionix II system with data recorded in Newtons.
RESULTS: Using lamina screws as a salvage technique generated mean pullout forces (778.9 +/- 161.4 N) similar to that of the index pedicle screws (805.3 +/- 261.7 N; p = 0.796). However, mean lamina screw peak IT (5.2 +/- 2.0 lbs/in) was significantly lower than mean index pedicle screw peak IT (9.1 +/- 3.6 lbs/in; p = 0.012). Bone mineral density was strongly correlated with pedicle screw pullout strength (r = 0.95) but less with lamina screw pullout strength (r = 0.04). The mean lamina width measured using calipers (5.7 +/- 1.0 mm) was significantly different from the CT-measured mean lamina width (5.1 +/- 0.8 mm; p = 0.003). Similarly, the mean pedicle width recorded with calipers (6.6 +/- 1.1 mm) was significantly different from the CT-measured mean pedicle width (6.2 +/- 1.3 mm; p = 0.014). The mean laminar width measured on CT at the thinnest point ranged from 3.8 to 6.8 mm, allowing a 3.5-mm screw to be placed without difficulty.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that using lamina screws as a salvage technique at C-7 provides similar fixation strength as the index pedicle screw. The C-7 lamina appears to have an ideal anatomical width for the insertion of 3.5-mm screws commonly used for cervical fusions. Therefore, if the transpedicular screw fails, using intralaminar screws appear to be a biomechanically sound salvage technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19569937     DOI: 10.3171/2009.3.SPINE08648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  11 in total

1.  C7 posterior fixation using intralaminar screws : early clinical and radiographic outcome.

Authors:  Sang Hoon Jang; Jae Taek Hong; Il Sup Kim; In Sung Yeo; Byung Chul Son; Sang Won Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-08-31

2.  Which salvage fixation technique is best for the failed initial screw fixation at the cervicothoracic junction? A biomechanical comparison study.

Authors:  Jae Taek Hong; Takigawa Tomoyuki; Ashish Jain; Alejandro A Espinoza Orías; Nozomu Inoue; Howard S An
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  A computed tomography-based anatomic comparison of three different types of c7 posterior fixation techniques : pedicle, intralaminar, and lateral mass screws.

Authors:  Woo Young Jang; Il Sup Kim; Ho Jin Lee; Jae Hoon Sung; Sang Won Lee; Jae Taek Hong
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2011-09-30

4.  Comparison of revision strategies for failed C2-posterior cervical pedicle screws: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Michael Mayer; Juliane Zenner; Robert Bogner; Wolfgang Hitzl; Markus Figl; Arvind von Keudell; Daniel Stephan; Rainer Penzkofer; Peter Augat; Gundobert Korn; Herbert Resch; Heiko Koller
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  A biomechanical comparison of three different posterior fixation constructs used for c6-c7 cervical spine immobilization: a finite element study.

Authors:  Jae Taek Hong; Muhammad Qasim; Alejandro A Espinoza Orías; Raghu N Natarajan; Howard S An
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 1.742

6.  Is polymethyl methacrylate a viable option for salvaging lateral mass screw failure in the subaxial cervical spine?

Authors:  Michael A Gallizzi; Craig A Kuhns; Tyler J Jenkins; Ferris M Pfeiffer
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2014-10-10

7.  Ideal T1 laminar screw fixation based on computed tomography morphometry.

Authors:  Xiao-Bo Wang; Xin Zheng; Hou-Qing Long; Wen-Li Chen; Xing Cheng; Yang-Liang Huang; Jing-Hui Xu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Laminar screw fixation in the subaxial cervical spine: A report on three cases.

Authors:  Hironori Tanabe; Yoichi Aota; Tomoyuki Saito
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-10-18

9.  Comparison of Three Different Options for C7 Posterior Vertebral Anchor in the Indian Population-Lateral Mass, Pedicle, and Lamina: A Computed Tomography-Based Morphometric Analysis.

Authors:  Vibhu Krishnan Viswanathan; Surabhi Subramanian; Sushma Viswanathan
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-07-27

10.  Feasibility of Sub-Axial Cervical Laminar Screws, Including C7, in the Indian Population: A Study on 50 Patients Using Computed Tomography-Based Morphometry Measurements.

Authors:  Abhishek Srivastava; Geetanjali Nanda; Rajat Mahajan; Ankur Nanda; Sahil Batra; Nirajana Mishra; Naveen Pandita; Harvinder Singh Chhabra
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-10-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.