Literature DB >> 19569249

The impact of cytomorphology, cytogenetics, molecular genetics, and immunophenotyping in a comprehensive diagnostic workup of myelodysplastic syndromes.

Ulrike Bacher1, Torsten Haferlach, Wolfgang Kern, Tamara Weiss, Susanne Schnittger, Claudia Haferlach.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because of limited reproducibility of morphologic features, the morphological categorization of initial myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) cases remains a major task in a diagnostic setting.
METHODS: To further evaluate the role of additional diagnostic methods for suspected early MDS, the authors analyzed 1965 cases with unclear cytopenia where at least cytomorphology and immunophenotyping were performed in parallel, combined with cytogenetics and molecular genetics.
RESULTS: In 353 patients, both methods diagnosed malignant/nonmalignant disease other than MDS, and 557 patients had MDS-refractory anemia with excess of blasts/chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. The remaining 1055 patients (53.7%), where early MDS/reactive cytopenia had to be assumed, were categorized into 6 groups depending on cytomorphology/immunophenotyping results for or against MDS. In 659 of 1055 cases (62.4%) with suspected initial MDS, cytomorphology and immunophenotyping were concordant in the categorization of MDS/non-MDS. Cytogenetics, available in 951 of 1055 patients, revealed the highest frequency of aberrant karyotypes when both cytomorphology and immunophenotyping proposed MDS (63 of 227; 27.8%). But also in the groups where either cytomorphology or immunophenotyping showed evidence of MDS, aberrant karyotypes were found in 6% to 14% of patients. Even when both morphology and immunophenotyping showed no MDS, 11 of 208 (5.3%) had cytogenetic aberrations. RUNX1/AML1 mutation screening was positive in 15% in the latter group. NRAS, MLL-PTD, NPM1, and JAK2V617F were detected in low frequencies, confirming MDS diagnosis in the respective cases.
CONCLUSIONS: This report outlines the power of a combined diagnostic approach for suspected initial cases of MDS including immunophenotyping, cytogenetics, and molecular genetics with selected markers in addition to cytomorphology. Diagnostic algorithms should be developed, and immunophenotyping should be further validated for this specific indication. 2009 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19569249     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  4 in total

Review 1.  Standardizing the initial evaluation for myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Danielle Marshall; Gail J Roboz
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.952

2.  A case of near-triploidy in myelodysplastic syndrome with del(5q) combined with del(1p) and del(13q).

Authors:  Bo-Ram Kim; Ji-Eun Kim; Kwang-Sook Woo; Kyeong-Hee Kim; Jeong-Man Kim; Suee Lee; Lisa G Shaffer; Jin-Yeong Han
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 3.  Importance of classical morphology in the diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  Rosangela Invernizzi; Federica Quaglia; Matteo Giovanni Della Porta
Journal:  Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 2.576

Review 4.  NPM1-Mutated Myeloid Neoplasms with <20% Blasts: A Really Distinct Clinico-Pathologic Entity?

Authors:  Fabio Forghieri; Vincenzo Nasillo; Ambra Paolini; Francesca Bettelli; Valeria Pioli; Davide Giusti; Andrea Gilioli; Corrado Colasante; Gloria Acquaviva; Giovanni Riva; Patrizia Barozzi; Rossana Maffei; Leonardo Potenza; Roberto Marasca; Claudio Fozza; Enrico Tagliafico; Tommaso Trenti; Patrizia Comoli; Giuseppe Longo; Mario Luppi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.