Literature DB >> 19568374

Study design in medical research: part 2 of a series on the evaluation of scientific publications.

Bernd Röhrig1, Jean-Baptist du Prel, Maria Blettner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The scientific value and informativeness of a medical study are determined to a major extent by the study design. Errors in study design cannot be corrected afterwards. Various aspects of study design are discussed in this article.
METHODS: Six essential considerations in the planning and evaluation of medical research studies are presented and discussed in the light of selected scientific articles from the international literature as well as the authors' own scientific expertise with regard to study design.
RESULTS: The six main considerations for study design are the question to be answered, the study population, the unit of analysis, the type of study, the measuring technique, and the calculation of sample size.
CONCLUSIONS: This article is intended to give the reader guidance in evaluating the design of studies in medical research. This should enable the reader to categorize medical studies better and to assess their scientific quality more accurately.

Keywords:  measuring technique; quality; study; study design; study type

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19568374      PMCID: PMC2695375          DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2009.0184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int        ISSN: 1866-0452            Impact factor:   5.594


  12 in total

Review 1.  Sifting the evidence-what's wrong with significance tests?

Authors:  J A Sterne; G Davey Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-01-27

Review 2.  The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials.

Authors:  D Moher; K F Schulz; D G Altman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  The composition and function of ethical committees.

Authors:  W W May
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Sample size estimation: how many individuals should be studied?

Authors:  John Eng
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  [Significance, effect size, and confidence interval].

Authors:  H Faller
Journal:  Rehabilitation (Stuttg)       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.113

6.  Bias in analytic research.

Authors:  D L Sackett
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1979

7.  Statistical power, sample size, and their reporting in randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  D Moher; C S Dulberg; G A Wells
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-07-13       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Statistical guidelines for contributors to medical journals.

Authors:  D G Altman; S M Gore; M J Gardner; S J Pocock
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-05-07

9.  Statistics and ethics in medical research. Misuse of statistics is unethical.

Authors:  D G Altman
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-11-01

10.  The continuing unethical conduct of underpowered clinical trials.

Authors:  Scott D Halpern; Jason H T Karlawish; Jesse A Berlin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-07-17       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Randomized controlled trials: part 17 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications.

Authors:  Maria Kabisch; Christian Ruckes; Monika Seibert-Grafe; Maria Blettner
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Data analysis of epidemiological studies: part 11 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications.

Authors:  Meike Ressing; Maria Blettner; Stefanie J Klug
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Choosing statistical tests: part 12 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications.

Authors:  Jean-Baptist du Prel; Bernd Röhrig; Gerhard Hommel; Maria Blettner
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Focus on research: Deutsches Arzteblatt can look back on a long tradition of publishing original articles in medical science.

Authors:  Svenja Ludwig; Christopher Baethge
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 5.  Sample size calculation in clinical trials: part 13 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications.

Authors:  Bernd Röhrig; Jean-Baptist du Prel; Daniel Wachtlin; Robert Kwiecien; Maria Blettner
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 5.594

6.  Predictors for half-year outcome of impairment in daily life for back pain patients referred for physiotherapy: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Sven Karstens; Katja Hermann; Ingo Froböse; Stephan W Weiler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Development of the Biological Experimental Design Concept Inventory (BEDCI).

Authors:  Thomas Deane; Kathy Nomme; Erica Jeffery; Carol Pollock; Gülnur Birol
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 8.  Malaria research in Malawi from 1984 to 2016: a literature review and bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Chikondi A Mwendera; Christiaan de Jager; Herbert Longwe; Charles Hongoro; Clifford M Mutero; Kamija S Phiri
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 2.979

9.  Standardizing the Assessment of Macular Pigment Using a Dual-Wavelength Autofluorescence Technique.

Authors:  Marina Green-Gomez; Paul S Bernstein; Christine A Curcio; Rachel Moran; Warren Roche; John M Nolan
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 3.283

10.  Global and Regional Effects of Bladder Cancer Risk Associated with Pioglitazone Therapy in Patients with Diabetes.

Authors:  Hua Qu; Yi Zheng; Yuren Wang; Rui Zhang; Xiongzhong Ruan; Gangyi Yang; Zhenqi Liu; Hongting Zheng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.