Literature DB >> 19567831

Met induces diverse mammary carcinomas in mice and is associated with human basal breast cancer.

Carrie R Graveel1, Jack D DeGroot, Yanli Su, Julie Koeman, Karl Dykema, Samuel Leung, Jacqueline Snider, Sherri R Davies, Pamela J Swiatek, Sandra Cottingham, Mark A Watson, Matthew J Ellis, Robert E Sigler, Kyle A Furge, George F Vande Woude.   

Abstract

Understanding the signaling pathways that drive aggressive breast cancers is critical to the development of effective therapeutics. The oncogene MET is associated with decreased survival in breast cancer, yet the role that MET plays in the various breast cancer subtypes is unclear. We describe a knockin mouse with mutationally activated Met (Met(mut)) that develops a high incidence of diverse mammary tumors with basal characteristics, including metaplasia, absence of progesterone receptor and ERBB2 expression, and expression of cytokeratin 5. With gene expression and tissue microarray analysis, we show that high MET expression in human breast cancers significantly correlated with estrogen receptor negative/ERBB2 negative tumors and with basal breast cancers. Few treatment options exist for breast cancers of the basal or trastuzumab-resistant ERBB2 subtypes. We conclude from these studies that MET may play a critical role in the development of the most aggressive breast cancers and may be a rational therapeutic target.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19567831      PMCID: PMC2722304          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0810403106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  31 in total

Review 1.  Met, metastasis, motility and more.

Authors:  Carmen Birchmeier; Walter Birchmeier; Ermanno Gherardi; George F Vande Woude
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 94.444

2.  Met expression is associated with poor outcome in patients with axillary lymph node negative breast carcinoma.

Authors:  R L Camp; E B Rimm; D L Rimm
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Tissue microarray-based studies of patients with lymph node negative breast carcinoma show that met expression is associated with worse outcome but is not correlated with epidermal growth factor family receptors.

Authors:  Idris Tolgay Ocal; Marisa Dolled-Filhart; Thomas G D'Aquila; Robert L Camp; David L Rimm
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications.

Authors:  T Sørlie; C M Perou; R Tibshirani; T Aas; S Geisler; H Johnsen; T Hastie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; T Thorsen; H Quist; J C Matese; P O Brown; D Botstein; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours.

Authors:  C M Perou; T Sørlie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; C A Rees; J R Pollack; D T Ross; H Johnsen; L A Akslen; O Fluge; A Pergamenschikov; C Williams; S X Zhu; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale; P O Brown; D Botstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-17       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  HER2/neu as a predictive factor in breast cancer.

Authors:  C Lohrisch; M Piccart
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Met induces mammary tumors with diverse histologies and is associated with poor outcome and human basal breast cancer.

Authors:  Marisa G Ponzo; Robert Lesurf; Stephanie Petkiewicz; Frances P O'Malley; Dushanthi Pinnaduwage; Irene L Andrulis; Shelley B Bull; Naila Chughtai; Dongmei Zuo; Margarita Souleimanova; David Germain; Atilla Omeroglu; Robert D Cardiff; Michael Hallett; Morag Park
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Targeted expression of HGF/SF in mouse mammary epithelium leads to metastatic adenosquamous carcinomas through the activation of multiple signal transduction pathways.

Authors:  Marta I Gallego; Brian Bierie; Lothar Hennighausen
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2003-11-20       Impact factor: 9.867

9.  Persistent mammary hyperplasia in FVB/N mice.

Authors:  Ana I Nieto; G Shyamala; Jose J Galvez; Gudmundur Thordarson; Lalage M Wakefield; Robert D Cardiff
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 0.982

10.  Activation of the Met receptor by cell attachment induces and sustains hepatocellular carcinomas in transgenic mice.

Authors:  R Wang; L D Ferrell; S Faouzi; J J Maher; J M Bishop
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2001-05-28       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  63 in total

1.  Receptor tyrosine kinase signaling favors a protumorigenic state in breast cancer cells by inhibiting the adaptive immune response.

Authors:  Josie Ursini-Siegel; Sean Cory; Dongmei Zuo; William R Hardy; Elton Rexhepaj; Sonya Lam; Babette Schade; Karin Jirstrom; Eva Bjur; Ciriaco A Piccirillo; David Denardo; Lisa M Coussens; Donal J Brennan; William M Gallagher; Morag Park; Tony Pawson; Michael Hallett; William J Muller
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 2.  Mechanisms of HGF/Met signaling to Brk and Sam68 in breast cancer progression.

Authors:  Alessia Locatelli; Kristopher A Lofgren; Andrea R Daniel; Nancy E Castro; Carol A Lange
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.869

3.  Promise and challenges on the horizon of MET-targeted cancer therapeutics.

Authors:  Yu-Wen Zhang
Journal:  World J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-05-26

4.  Lunatic fringe deficiency cooperates with the Met/Caveolin gene amplicon to induce basal-like breast cancer.

Authors:  Keli Xu; Jerry Usary; Philaretos C Kousis; Aleix Prat; Dong-Yu Wang; Jessica R Adams; Wei Wang; Amanda J Loch; Tao Deng; Wei Zhao; Robert Darrell Cardiff; Keejung Yoon; Nicholas Gaiano; Vicki Ling; Joseph Beyene; Eldad Zacksenhaus; Tom Gridley; Wey L Leong; Cynthia J Guidos; Charles M Perou; Sean E Egan
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 31.743

5.  Analysis of MET genetic aberrations in patients with breast cancer at MD Anderson Phase I unit.

Authors:  Debora de Melo Gagliato; Denis L Fontes Jardim; Gerald Falchook; Chad Tang; Ralph Zinner; Jennifer J Wheler; Filip Janku; Vivek Subbiah; Sarina A Piha-Paul; Siqing Fu; Kenneth Hess; Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri; Stacy Moulder; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Funda Meric-Bernstam; David S Hong
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Met receptors induce Sam68-dependent cell migration by activation of alternate extracellular signal-regulated kinase family members.

Authors:  Alessia Locatelli; Carol A Lange
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  MicroRNA cluster 221-222 and estrogen receptor alpha interactions in breast cancer.

Authors:  Gianpiero Di Leva; Pierluigi Gasparini; Claudia Piovan; Apollinaire Ngankeu; Michela Garofalo; Cristian Taccioli; Marilena V Iorio; Meng Li; Stefano Volinia; Hansjuerg Alder; Tatsuya Nakamura; Gerard Nuovo; Yunlong Liu; Kenneth P Nephew; Carlo M Croce
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Targeting Met and Notch in the Lfng-deficient, Met-amplified triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Shubing Zhang; Wen-cheng Chung; Lucio Miele; Keli Xu
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 9.  The Met oncogene and basal-like breast cancer: another culprit to watch out for?

Authors:  Stefania Gastaldi; Paolo M Comoglio; Livio Trusolino
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Germline met mutations in mice reveal mutation- and background-associated differences in tumor profiles.

Authors:  Carrie R Graveel; Jack D DeGroot; Robert E Sigler; George F Vande Woude
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.