Literature DB >> 10590366

Met expression is associated with poor outcome in patients with axillary lymph node negative breast carcinoma.

R L Camp1, E B Rimm, D L Rimm.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Activation of Met, the receptor for scatter factor/hepatocyte growth factor, is associated with mitogenesis, motogenesis, and decreased cell adhesion. Elevated expression of Met has been shown in advanced cases of carcinoma of the prostate, stomach, pancreas, and thyroid. The authors previously demonstrated that Met expression is an independent prognostic marker associated with decreased survival in patients with breast carcinoma.
METHODS: Expression of Met in 113 archival breast carcinoma specimens from patients with axillary lymph node negative invasive ductal carcinoma was evaluated using a standard immunoperoxidase technique. Cases were scored by two pathologists using an H-score algorithm and then analyzed for correlation with known prognostic factors and survival.
RESULTS: Expression of Met showed a bimodal distribution with 25% of cases showing high levels of expression. In contrast to previous studies, the results of the current study showed a significant association between Met expression and nuclear and histologic grade. The 5-year survival rate for Met negative patients with tumors with low Met expression was 95% in this cohort, compared with 80% for patients with tumors showing high Met expression. Patients whose tumors had a high level of Met expression were found to have a 5-year relative risk (RR) of dying of metastatic disease of 5.05 (P = 0.03) independent of patient age and tumor size. Combined analysis of Met and nuclear grade resulted in a marked increase in independent predictive value (RR = 33.4; P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study found that high levels of Met expression were associated with death due to metastatic disease in patients with axillary lymph node negative breast carcinoma. Expression of Met may be a useful prognostic indicator of more aggressive disease in patients whose prognosis is not easily stratified by current histopathologic markers. Copyright 1999 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10590366     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19991201)86:11<2259::aid-cncr13>3.0.co;2-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  63 in total

1.  The HGF receptor c-Met is overexpressed in esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Luis J Herrera; Talal El-Hefnawy; Pierre E Queiroz de Oliveira; Siva Raja; Sydney Finkelstein; William Gooding; James D Luketich; Tony E Godfrey; Steven J Hughes
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.715

2.  LRIG1 is a novel negative regulator of the Met receptor and opposes Met and Her2 synergy.

Authors:  David L Shattuck; Jamie K Miller; Melanie Laederich; Melanie Funes; Heidi Petersen; Kermit L Carraway; Colleen Sweeney
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  The clinical value of serum hepatocyte growth factor levels in patients undergoing primary radiotherapy for glioma: effect on progression-free survival.

Authors:  Qing-le Liang; Zheng-ying Mo; Ping Wang; Xiao Li; Zhi-xiang Liu; Zhang-ming Zhou
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-07-27       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Met induces diverse mammary carcinomas in mice and is associated with human basal breast cancer.

Authors:  Carrie R Graveel; Jack D DeGroot; Yanli Su; Julie Koeman; Karl Dykema; Samuel Leung; Jacqueline Snider; Sherri R Davies; Pamela J Swiatek; Sandra Cottingham; Mark A Watson; Matthew J Ellis; Robert E Sigler; Kyle A Furge; George F Vande Woude
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  SRC-3 coactivator regulates cell resistance to cytotoxic stress via TRAF4-mediated p53 destabilization.

Authors:  Ping Yi; Weiya Xia; Ray-Chang Wu; David M Lonard; Mien-Chie Hung; Bert W O'Malley
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  Met and c-Src cooperate to compensate for loss of epidermal growth factor receptor kinase activity in breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Kelly L Mueller; Lauren A Hunter; Stephen P Ethier; Julie L Boerner
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Heterogeneity of breast cancer metastases: comparison of therapeutic target expression and promoter methylation between primary tumors and their multifocal metastases.

Authors:  Julie M Wu; Mary Jo Fackler; Marc K Halushka; Diana W Molavi; M Evangeline Taylor; Wei Wen Teo; Constance Griffin; John Fetting; Nancy E Davidson; Angelo M De Marzo; Jessica L Hicks; Dhananjay Chitale; Marc Ladanyi; Saraswati Sukumar; Pedram Argani
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 8.  The Met oncogene and basal-like breast cancer: another culprit to watch out for?

Authors:  Stefania Gastaldi; Paolo M Comoglio; Livio Trusolino
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  TGFBI expression is associated with a better response to chemotherapy in NSCLC.

Authors:  Marta Irigoyen; María J Pajares; Jackeline Agorreta; Mariano Ponz-Sarvisé; Elisabeth Salvo; María D Lozano; Ruben Pío; Ignacio Gil-Bazo; Ana Rouzaut
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 27.401

10.  EGFR/Met association regulates EGFR TKI resistance in breast cancer.

Authors:  Kelly L Mueller; Zeng-Quan Yang; Ramsi Haddad; Stephen P Ethier; Julie L Boerner
Journal:  J Mol Signal       Date:  2010-07-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.