Kang Cheng1, Sanjeev Gupta. 1. Department of Medicine, Marion Bessin Liver Research Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, 10461 NY, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Identification of transplanted human cells in mouse models is important for studying the biology and therapeutic potential of stem/progenitor cells. As stem/progenitor cells are often transplanted in low numbers, detection of cell engraftment requires sensitive tools. Probes for single copy genes, as well as repetitive genetic elements are available for detecting transplanted cells, although their value relative to one another had not been defined. METHODS: We examined whether human sequences in chimeric mice could be measured with quantitative real-time polymerase chain reactions for Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, type 1 repeat element, sex-determining region Y, or short tandem repeats (STR) across human leukocyte antigen (HLA) regions, which are distinct from rodent genomes. RESULTS: We found that specific probes for all three candidate approaches successfully identified human cells in mixtures containing human and mouse genomes. However, probes for Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease element or STRs for HLA regions were less effective for low numbers of transplanted human stem/progenitor cells in mice than human sex-determining region on Y-chromosome. None of the approaches could identify transplanted human cells constituting less than one percent of the total cell mass. This required localization of transplanted cells in tissue sections with human-specific in situ hybridization probes. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative assays with probes for single copy gene sequences, STRs or sex-determining region will be helpful for demonstrating organ repopulation, although initial lower frequency engraftment of human cells in chimeric mice will be most effectively identified by complementary tools, such as in situ localization of human cells in tissues.
BACKGROUND: Identification of transplanted human cells in mouse models is important for studying the biology and therapeutic potential of stem/progenitor cells. As stem/progenitor cells are often transplanted in low numbers, detection of cell engraftment requires sensitive tools. Probes for single copy genes, as well as repetitive genetic elements are available for detecting transplanted cells, although their value relative to one another had not been defined. METHODS: We examined whether human sequences in chimeric mice could be measured with quantitative real-time polymerase chain reactions for Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, type 1 repeat element, sex-determining region Y, or short tandem repeats (STR) across human leukocyte antigen (HLA) regions, which are distinct from rodent genomes. RESULTS: We found that specific probes for all three candidate approaches successfully identified human cells in mixtures containing human and mouse genomes. However, probes for Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease element or STRs for HLA regions were less effective for low numbers of transplanted human stem/progenitor cells in mice than humansex-determining region on Y-chromosome. None of the approaches could identify transplanted human cells constituting less than one percent of the total cell mass. This required localization of transplanted cells in tissue sections with human-specific in situ hybridization probes. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative assays with probes for single copy gene sequences, STRs or sex-determining region will be helpful for demonstrating organ repopulation, although initial lower frequency engraftment of human cells in chimeric mice will be most effectively identified by complementary tools, such as in situ localization of human cells in tissues.
Authors: Ling-Jia Wang; Yong Ming Chen; David George; Francois Smets; Etienne M Sokal; Eric G Bremer; Humberto E Soriano Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 5.799
Authors: Sarah L Bick; David P Bick; Brent E Wells; Mark R Roesler; Estil Y Strawn; Eduardo C Lau Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2008-08-02 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Henning Wege; Hai T Le; Michael S Chui; Li Liu; Jian Wu; Ranjit Giri; Harmeet Malhi; Baljit S Sappal; Vinay Kumaran; Sanjeev Gupta; Mark A Zern Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Michal Zalzman; Sanjeev Gupta; Ranjit K Giri; Irina Berkovich; Baljit S Sappal; Ohad Karnieli; Mark A Zern; Norman Fleischer; Shimon Efrat Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-05-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jae-Jin Cho; Brigid Joseph; Baljit Singh Sappal; Ranjit K Giri; Richard Wang; John W Ludlow; Mark E Furth; Robert Susick; Sanjeev Gupta Journal: Liver Int Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 5.828
Authors: K P Ponder; S Gupta; F Leland; G Darlington; M Finegold; J DeMayo; F D Ledley; J R Chowdhury; S L Woo Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1991-02-15 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Padma Priya Togarrati; Robson T Sasaki; Mohamed Abdel-Mohsen; Nuntana Dinglasan; Xutao Deng; Shivani Desai; Elaine Emmerson; Elizabeth Yee; William R Ryan; Marcelo C P da Silva; Sarah M Knox; Satish K Pillai; Marcus O Muench Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-06-14 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Lisa M McGinley; Osama N Kashlan; Elizabeth S Bruno; Kevin S Chen; John M Hayes; Samy R Kashlan; Julia Raykin; Karl Johe; Geoffrey G Murphy; Eva L Feldman Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-10-03 Impact factor: 4.379