Literature DB >> 19566026

Assessment of alveolar bone levels from bitewing, periapical and panoramic radiographs in periodontitis patients.

R Gedik1, I Marakoglu, S Demirer.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between loss of radiographic crestal bone height in panoramic, bitewing and periapical radiography and to probe the attachment loss after periodontal treatment. Radiographic and probing measurements were made at baseline and after one year The population in the study consisted of 21 individuals, 13 females and 8 males, ages 18-59 [mean 35.7] years. A total of 42 interproximal intra-bony defects of 21 mandibular first molar teeth, treatments of which were planned by subgingival curettage procedures, were selected from among 21 subjects who had signed consent forms. Measurements of the distance between the cemento-enamel junction and the alveolar crest were compared with probing crestal bone level and radiographic measurements before and one year after the procedures. The results of probing pocket depths level before and one year after subgingival curettage were different with the mean average being 1.18 +/- 1.51 mm. These changes were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Bitewing radiography showed the highest accuracy among radiographic methods in the assessment of the crestal bone level mean average 0.22 +/- 0.87 mm (p < 0.05). There was only a slight mean difference compared to panoramic radiography but this was statistically insignificant, mean average 0.20 +/-1.35 mm (p > 0.05), and the periapical radiography had the lowest accuracy of radiographic methods, changed mean average -0.14 +/- 1.19 mm (p > 0.05). In summary, we can say that both bitewing and panoramic radiography are preferred to periapical images for crestal bone assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19566026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West Indian Med J        ISSN: 0043-3144            Impact factor:   0.171


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of alveolar crest bone loss via premolar bitewing radiographs: presentation of a new method.

Authors:  Yaser Safi; Mahdi Kadkhodazadeh; Pooria Safai; Mohammad Esmaeelinejad; Nafiseh Shamloo
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.614

2.  Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography with bitewing radiography for detection of periodontal bone loss and assessment of effects of different voxel resolutions: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Hayriye Cetmili; Melek Tassoker; Sevgi Sener
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 1.852

3.  Utility of a Newly Designed Film Holder for Premolar Bitewing Radiography.

Authors:  Yaser Safi; Mohammad Esmaeelinejad; Zahra Vasegh; Solmaz Valizadeh; Mohammad Mehdi Aghdasi; Omid Sarani; Mahmoud Afsahi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-11-01

4.  Assessment of digital panoramic radiography's diagnostic value in angular bony lesions with 5 mm or deeper pocket depth in mandibular molars.

Authors:  Bardia Vadiati Saberi; Somayeh Nemati; Meisam Malekzadeh; Afrooz Javanmard
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb

5.  Comparison of radiographic changes in the alveolar crest after extraction of fully and partially erupted premolars during orthodontic treatment: A retrospective analytical study.

Authors:  Sanam Darban Hosseini; Mojgan Kachoei; Masoumeh Faramarzi; Mahdiyeh Esmaeilzadeh
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2021-12-05

6.  Comparative study between two techniques for alveolar bone loss assessment: A pilot study.

Authors:  Ronaldo Lira-Júnior; Irlan de Almeida Freires; Isabelle Linsmacêdo de Oliveira; Ennyo Sobral Crispim da Silva; Severinocelestino da Silva; Roberto Lira de Brito
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2013-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.