Literature DB >> 19565431

Finding meaning in art: preferred levels of ambiguity in art appreciation.

Martina Jakesch1, Helmut Leder.   

Abstract

Uncertainty is typically not desirable in everyday experiences, but uncertainty in the form of ambiguity may be a defining feature of aesthetic experiences of modern art. In this study, we examined different hypotheses concerning the quantity and quality of information appreciated in art. Artworks were shown together with auditorily presented statements. We tested whether the amount of information, the amount of matching information, or the proportion of matching to nonmatching statements apparent in a picture (levels of ambiguity) affect liking and interestingness. Only the levels of ambiguity predicted differences in the two dependent variables. These findings reveal that ambiguity is an important determinant of aesthetic appreciation and that a certain level of ambiguity is appreciable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19565431      PMCID: PMC3210939          DOI: 10.1080/17470210903038974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  4 in total

1.  Effort after meaning and the hedonic value of paintings.

Authors:  Phil A Russell
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2003-02

2.  A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments.

Authors:  Helmut Leder; Benno Belke; Andries Oeberst; Dorothee Augustin
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2004-11

3.  Entitling art: Influence of title information on understanding and appreciation of paintings.

Authors:  Helmut Leder; Claus-Christian Carbon; Ai-Leen Ripsas
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2005-11-11

4.  Making meaning brings pleasure: the influence of titles on aesthetic experiences.

Authors:  K Millis
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2001-09
  4 in total
  11 in total

1.  Artworks as dichotomous objects: implications for the scientific study of aesthetic experience.

Authors:  Robert Pepperell
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Is this a "Fettecke" or just a "greasy corner"? About the capability of laypersons to differentiate between art and non-art via object's originality.

Authors:  Manuela Haertel; Claus-Christian Carbon
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2014-11-28

3.  Titles change the esthetic appreciations of paintings.

Authors:  Gernot Gerger; Helmut Leder
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Visualizing the Impact of Art: An Update and Comparison of Current Psychological Models of Art Experience.

Authors:  Matthew Pelowski; Patrick S Markey; Jon O Lauring; Helmut Leder
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Faces on Her and His Mind: Female and Likable.

Authors:  Marina A Pavlova; Annika Mayer; Franziska Hösl; Alexander N Sokolov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Expressive intent, ambiguity, and aesthetic experiences of music and poetry.

Authors:  Elizabeth Hellmuth Margulis; William H Levine; Rhimmon Simchy-Gross; Carolyn Kroger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  When Challenging Art Gets Liked: Evidences for a Dual Preference Formation Process for Fluent and Non-Fluent Portraits.

Authors:  Benno Belke; Helmut Leder; Claus-Christian Carbon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Image ambiguity and fluency.

Authors:  Martina Jakesch; Helmut Leder; Michael Forster
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Art in time and space: context modulates the relation between art experience and viewing time.

Authors:  David Brieber; Marcos Nadal; Helmut Leder; Raphael Rosenberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Private and Shared Taste in Art and Face Appreciation.

Authors:  Helmut Leder; Juergen Goller; Tanya Rigotti; Michael Forster
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.