Literature DB >> 16289075

Entitling art: Influence of title information on understanding and appreciation of paintings.

Helmut Leder1, Claus-Christian Carbon, Ai-Leen Ripsas.   

Abstract

There is evidence that presenting titles together with artworks affects their processing. We investigated whether elaborative and descriptive titles change the appreciation and understanding of paintings. Under long presentation times (90 s) in Experiment 1, testing representative and abstract paintings, elaborative titles increased the understanding of abstract paintings but not their appreciation. In order to test predictions concerning the time course of understanding and aesthetic appreciation [Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., & Augustin, D. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95(4), 489-508] in Experiment 2, abstract paintings were presented under two presentation times. For short presentation times (1 s), descriptive titles increased the understanding more than elaborative titles, whereas for medium presentation times (10 s), elaborative titles increased the understanding more than descriptive titles. Thus, with artworks a presentation time of around 10 s might be needed, to assign a meaning beyond the mere description. Only at medium presentation times did the participants with more art knowledge have a better understanding of the paintings than participants with less art knowledge. Thus, it seems that art knowledge becomes significant, if there is sufficient time to assign a meaning and the present studies reveal the importance of considering the time course in aesthetic appreciation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16289075     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  29 in total

1.  Finding meaning in art: preferred levels of ambiguity in art appreciation.

Authors:  Martina Jakesch; Helmut Leder
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 2.143

2.  Differences in Art Appreciation in Autism: A Measure of Reduced Intuitive Processing.

Authors:  Mark Brosnan; Chris Ashwin
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2022-09-05

3.  Training facilitates object recognition in cubist paintings.

Authors:  Martin Wiesmann; Alumit Ishai
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Interaction between image and text during the process of biblical art reception.

Authors:  Gregor Hardiess; Caecilie Weissert
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 0.957

5.  Components of aesthetic experience: aesthetic fascination, aesthetic appraisal, and aesthetic emotion.

Authors:  Slobodan Marković
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2012-01-12

6.  Is this a "Fettecke" or just a "greasy corner"? About the capability of laypersons to differentiate between art and non-art via object's originality.

Authors:  Manuela Haertel; Claus-Christian Carbon
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2014-11-28

7.  Titles change the esthetic appreciations of paintings.

Authors:  Gernot Gerger; Helmut Leder
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  When the going gets tough the beautiful get going: aesthetic appeal facilitates task performance.

Authors:  Irene Reppa; Siné McDougall
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-10

9.  Aesthetic Experience of Representational Art: Liking Is Affected by Audio-Information Naming and Explaining Inaccuracies of Historical Paintings.

Authors:  Manuel Knoos; Manuela Glaser; Stephan Schwan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-07-19

10.  When Challenging Art Gets Liked: Evidences for a Dual Preference Formation Process for Fluent and Non-Fluent Portraits.

Authors:  Benno Belke; Helmut Leder; Claus-Christian Carbon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.