Literature DB >> 19565252

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with one cage and excised local bone.

Yuxiang Xiao1, Fangcai Li, Qixin Chen.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The effect of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with one cage and excised local bone were investigated in 52 patients with a mean follow-up of 18.2 months.
METHOD: The clinical outcomes including the modified Prolo scale and a visual analog scale (VAS), and radiological assessments including the ratio of interbody graft area, fusion rate, posterior disk height (PH), and the lordosis angle (LA) of the motion segment were studied.
RESULTS: According to a modified Prolo scale, 90.4% of the patients obtained either excellent or good results. The VAS significantly decreased postoperatively. There was significant postoperative improvement of the PH and LA, and no significant loss of the PH and LA was found at final follow-up. The fusion rate in this series was 96.6%.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, TLIF with one cage and excised local bone grafting can provide satisfactory treatment outcomes and solid interbody fusion without harvesting and grafting autologous iliac bone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19565252     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-009-0917-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  9 in total

1.  Single transverse-orientation cage via MIS-TLIF approach for the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a technical note.

Authors:  Shan-Jin Wang; Ying-Chao Han; Fu-Min Pan; Bin Ma; Jun Tan
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-15

2.  Comparing the process of creeping substitution between allograft bone and local bone grafting in lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Hui Huang; Chun Jiang; ZhenZhou Feng; Xiaoxing Jiang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-05-31       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Analysis of single cage position in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion through digital images.

Authors:  Xin Zhao; Chen Chen; Tangjun Zhou; Jie Mi; Lin Du; Zhanrong Kang; Jianming Huang; Kai Zhang; Xiaojiang Sun; Jie Zhao
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-11       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Fusion rate and influence of surgery-related factors in lumbar interbody arthrodesis for degenerative spine diseases: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  M Formica; D Vallerga; A Zanirato; L Cavagnaro; M Basso; S Divano; L Mosconi; E Quarto; G Siri; L Felli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2020-01-01

5.  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a single interbody cage and a tubular retraction system : technical tips, and perioperative, radiologic and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Chang Kyu Lee; Jeong Yoon Park; Ho Yeol Zhang
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-09-30

6.  Comparison of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in two-level degenerative lumbar disease.

Authors:  Guangfei Gu; Hailong Zhang; Guoxin Fan; Shisheng He; Xiaobing Cai; Xiaolong Shen; Xiaofei Guan; Xu Zhou
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-11-17       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Analysis of the correlative factors in the selection of interbody fusion cage height in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Hongli Wang; Wenjie Chen; Jianyuan Jiang; Feizhou Lu; Xiaosheng Ma; Xinlei Xia
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Comparison of Minimal Invasive Versus Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-level Lumbar Disease.

Authors:  Ju-Eun Kim; Hyun-Seung Yoo; Dae-Jung Choi; Eugene J Park; Seung-Min Jee
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 1.723

9.  The Prolo Scale: history, evolution and psychometric properties.

Authors:  Carla Vanti; Donatella Prosperi; Marco Boschi
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2013-05-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.