OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare state and regional variation in infant feeding regulations for child care facilities and to compare these regulations to national standards. METHODS: We reviewed regulations for child care for all US states and Washington, DC, and examined patterns according to type of facility and geographic region. We compared state regulations with national standards for feeding infants in child care. The standards included were: (1) infants are fed according to a feeding plan from a parent or physician; (2) breastfeeding is supported by the child care facility; (3) no solid food is given before 6 months of age; (4) infants are fed on demand; (5) infants are fed by a consistent caregiver; (6) infants are held while feeding; (7) infants cannot carry or sleep with a bottle; (8) caregivers cannot feed >1 infant at a time; (9) no cow's milk is given to children <12 months of age; (10) whole cow's milk is required for children 12 to 24 months of age; and (11) no solid food is fed in a bottle. RESULTS: The mean number of regulations for states was 2.8 (SD: 1.6) for centers and 2.0 (SD: 1.3) for family child care homes. No state had regulations for all 11 standards for centers; only Delaware had regulations for 10 of the 11 standards. For family child care homes, Ohio had regulations for 5 of the 11 standards, the most of any state. States in the South had the greatest mean number of regulations for centers (3.3) and family child care homes (2.2), and the West had the fewest (2.3 and 1.9, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Many states lacked infant feeding regulations. Encouraging states to meet best-practice national standards helps ensure that all child care facilities engage in appropriate and healthful infant feeding practices.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare state and regional variation in infant feeding regulations for child care facilities and to compare these regulations to national standards. METHODS: We reviewed regulations for child care for all US states and Washington, DC, and examined patterns according to type of facility and geographic region. We compared state regulations with national standards for feeding infants in child care. The standards included were: (1) infants are fed according to a feeding plan from a parent or physician; (2) breastfeeding is supported by the child care facility; (3) no solid food is given before 6 months of age; (4) infants are fed on demand; (5) infants are fed by a consistent caregiver; (6) infants are held while feeding; (7) infants cannot carry or sleep with a bottle; (8) caregivers cannot feed >1 infant at a time; (9) no cow's milk is given to children <12 months of age; (10) whole cow's milk is required for children 12 to 24 months of age; and (11) no solid food is fed in a bottle. RESULTS: The mean number of regulations for states was 2.8 (SD: 1.6) for centers and 2.0 (SD: 1.3) for family child care homes. No state had regulations for all 11 standards for centers; only Delaware had regulations for 10 of the 11 standards. For family child care homes, Ohio had regulations for 5 of the 11 standards, the most of any state. States in the South had the greatest mean number of regulations for centers (3.3) and family child care homes (2.2), and the West had the fewest (2.3 and 1.9, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Many states lacked infant feeding regulations. Encouraging states to meet best-practice national standards helps ensure that all child care facilities engage in appropriate and healthful infant feeding practices.
Authors: Christopher G Owen; Richard M Martin; Peter H Whincup; George Davey-Smith; Matthew W Gillman; Derek G Cook Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Christopher G Owen; Richard M Martin; Peter H Whincup; George Davey Smith; Derek G Cook Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Sara E Benjamin; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Elsie M Taveras; Jess Haines; Jonathan Finkelstein; Ken Kleinman; Matthew W Gillman Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2009-07-27 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Heather M Wasser; Amanda L Thompson; Anna Maria Siega-Riz; Linda S Adair; Eric A Hodges; Margaret E Bentley Journal: Appetite Date: 2013-07-12 Impact factor: 3.868
Authors: Traci A Bekelman; Dana Dabelea; Jody M Ganiban; Andrew Law; Alexandra McGovern Reilly; Keri N Althoff; Noel Mueller; Carlos A Camargo; Cristiane S Duarte; Anne L Dunlop; Amy J Elliott; Assiamira Ferrara; Diane R Gold; Irva Hertz-Picciotto; Tina Hartert; Alison E Hipwell; Kathi Huddleston; Christine C Johnson; Margaret R Karagas; Catherine J Karr; Gurjit K Khurana Hershey; Leslie Leve; Somdat Mahabir; Cindy T McEvoy; Jenae Neiderhiser; Emily Oken; Andrew Rundle; Sheela Sathyanarayana; Christine Turley; Frances A Tylavsky; Sara E Watson; Rosalind Wright; Mingyu Zhang; Edward Zoratti Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2021-08-31 Impact factor: 9.298
Authors: Jakub Kakietek; Thearis A Osuji; Sarah Abood O'Dell; Andrew Breck; Laura Kettel Khan Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 2.830