Literature DB >> 19562514

The concurrent validity and responsiveness of the health utilities index (HUI 3) among patients with advanced HIV/AIDS.

Bohdan Nosyk1, Huiying Sun, Nick Bansback, Daphne P Guh, Xin Li, Paul Barnett, Ahmed Bayoumi, Susan Griffin, Vilija Joyce, Mark Holodniy, Doug K Owens, Aslam H Anis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the concurrent validity and responsiveness of the Health Utility Index 3 (HUI3) in patients with advanced HIV/AIDS, and to determine the responsiveness of this measure, the MOS-HIV and EQ-5D to HIV-related clinical events.
METHODS: Data from the OPTIMA (OPTions In Management with Antiretrovirals) trial was analyzed. Two aspects of the validity of the HUI3 were considered: concurrent validity was evaluated using Spearman correlations with MOS-HIV component and summary scores. Responsiveness to AIDS-defining events (ADE) and all adverse events (our external change criterion) was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves.
RESULTS: The study enrolled 368 patients (mean follow-up: 3.66 years); 82% had at least one severe adverse event and 27% had at least one ADE. The HUI3 scale and items showed good concurrent validity, with 85% of the expected relationships with the MOS-HIV subscales verified. The HUI3 was responsive to both adverse events (AUROC [95%CI]: 0.68 [0.57, 0.80]) and ADEs (0.62 [0.51, 0.74]). The EQ-5D was responsive to ADEs (0.66 [0.56, 0.76]), but not responsive to adverse events (0.56 [0.46, 0.68]).
CONCLUSION: The HUI3 is a valid and responsive measure of the change in HRQoL associated with clinical events in an advanced HIV/AIDS population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19562514     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-009-9504-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  34 in total

Review 1.  Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations.

Authors:  J A Husted; R J Cook; V T Farewell; D D Gladman
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: guidelines for instrument evaluation.

Authors:  C B Terwee; F W Dekker; W M Wiersinga; M F Prummel; P M M Bossuyt
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Multi-attribute preference functions. Health Utilities Index.

Authors:  G W Torrance; W Furlong; D Feeny; M Boyle
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  EuroQol: the current state of play.

Authors:  R Brooks
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model.

Authors:  James W Shaw; Jeffrey A Johnson; Stephen Joel Coons
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires.

Authors:  Caroline B Terwee; Sandra D M Bot; Michael R de Boer; Daniëlle A W M van der Windt; Dirk L Knol; Joost Dekker; Lex M Bouter; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 7.  Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Dennis Revicki; Ron D Hays; David Cella; Jeff Sloan
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Impact of combination therapy for HIV infection on inpatient census.

Authors:  R A Torres; M Barr
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-05-22       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Quality of life of patients with advanced HIV/AIDS: measuring the impact of both AIDS-defining events and non-AIDS serious adverse events.

Authors:  Aslam H Anis; Bohdan Nosyk; Huiying Sun; Daphne P Guh; Nick Bansback; Xin Li; Paul G Barnett; Vilija Joyce; Kathleen M Swanson; Tassos C Kyriakides; Mark Holodniy; D William Cameron; Sheldon T Brown
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 3.731

10.  Economic methods for measuring the quality of life associated with HIV infection.

Authors:  A M Bayoumi; D A Redelmeier
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.440

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Psychometric properties of self-reported measures of health-related quality of life in people living with HIV: a systematic review.

Authors:  Zheng Zhu; Yan Hu; Huan Wen; Zhongfang Yang; Shuyu Han; Lin Zhang
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 2.  Health-related quality of life assessment after antiretroviral therapy: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Harleen Gakhar; Amanda Kamali; Mark Holodniy
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  The cost-effectiveness and value of information of three influenza vaccination dosing strategies for individuals with human immunodeficiency virus.

Authors:  Bohdan Nosyk; Behnam Sharif; Huiying Sun; Curtis Cooper; Aslam H Anis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Longitudinal and cross sectional assessments of health utility in adults with HIV/AIDS: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bach Xuan Tran; Long Hoang Nguyen; Arto Ohinmaa; Rachel Marie Maher; Vuong Minh Nong; Carl A Latkin
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Quality of life profile and psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L in HIV/AIDS patients.

Authors:  Bach Xuan Tran; Arto Ohinmaa; Long Thanh Nguyen
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.186

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.