Literature DB >> 19562490

Predictors of locating children participants in epidemiological studies 20 years after last contact: Internet resources and longitudinal research.

Caroline P Barakat-Haddad1, Susan J Elliott, John Eyles, David Pengelly.   

Abstract

This study examines predictors of locating participants that were last contacted 20 years ago using public web-search directories, in order to facilitate longitudinal environmental health research. Participants (n = 3,202) resided in four distinct geographical neighborhoods in Hamilton, Ontario during childhood; they were between 15 and 17 years old when they were last contacted in 1986. Data used for tracing included available addresses, telephone numbers, given names, and parental names. Reverse and forward search strategies were used to retrieve updated contact details. 43% of the sample was traced using online directories. Following ethical approval, participants were contacted using traced data and 29% of the original cohort was located. Predictors of locating participants were: availability of paternal names, being traced to original addresses or telephone numbers, gender (male), relatively higher socioeconomic status in childhood, and not being exposed to smoking in childhood. Where participants resided in childhood was not a significant predictor of locating participants. Although 13% of the sample was traced using forward search by name, only 4% were located. For participants traced to available addresses or telephone numbers, the difference between the proportions of traced and located participants was <3%. Prospective studies on children may benefit from including the listed names that pertain to each child's telephone number and full parental names at recruitment, thereby increasing the likelihood of locating participants using Internet resources. Integrating the use of Internet-based public directories for cohort reconstruction can reduce financial costs related to follow-up for longitudinal research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19562490     DOI: 10.1007/s10654-009-9364-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0393-2990            Impact factor:   8.082


  15 in total

Review 1.  Statistics in medical journals: some recent trends.

Authors:  D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Use of World Wide Web-based directories for tracing subjects in epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  M M Koo; T E Rohan
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Loss to follow-up in cohort studies: how much is too much?

Authors:  Vicki Kristman; Michael Manno; Pierre Côté
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 4.  Cohort studies and randomized controlled studies in endocrinology.

Authors:  L M Salamone; J A Cauley
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.741

5.  Long-term follow-up of participants in clinical studies.

Authors:  Morris Weinberger; Myron H Weinberger; Naomi Fineberg; S Edwin Fineberg; Urban Wagner
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Cancer incidence in an urban community: an historical cohort study.

Authors:  N Kreiger; L A Spielberg; L Dodds; L Elinson
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr

7.  Using publicly available directories to trace survey nonresponders and calculate adjusted response rates.

Authors:  Bart J Harvey; Annette L Wilkins; Gillian A Hawker; Elizabeth M Badley; Peter C Coyte; Richard H Glazier; J Ivan Williams; James G Wright
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  A new longitudinal study of the health and wellbeing of Australian children: how will it help?

Authors:  Jan M Nicholson; Ann Sanson
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2003-03-17       Impact factor: 7.738

9.  Characteristics of childhood cancer survivors predicted their successful tracing.

Authors:  Ann C Mertens; Roberta Sposato Walls; Leslie Taylor; Pauline A Mitby; John Whitton; Peter D Inskip; John D Potter; Leslie L Robison
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 7.407

10.  Predictors of locating women six to eight years after contact: internet resources at recruitment may help to improve response rates in longitudinal research.

Authors:  Suzanne M Cadarette; Leigh Dickson; Monique A M Gignac; Dorcas E Beaton; Susan B Jaglal; Gillian A Hawker
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  6 in total

1.  Recruiting adolescent girls into a follow-up study: benefits of using a social networking website.

Authors:  Lindsey Jones; Brit I Saksvig; Mira Grieser; Deborah Rohm Young
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  The Generation R Study: design and cohort update 2010.

Authors:  Vincent W V Jaddoe; Cock M van Duijn; Albert J van der Heijden; Johan P Mackenbach; Henriëtte A Moll; Eric A P Steegers; Henning Tiemeier; Andre G Uitterlinden; Frank C Verhulst; Albert Hofman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  The Rotterdam Study: 2012 objectives and design update.

Authors:  Albert Hofman; Cornelia M van Duijn; Oscar H Franco; M Arfan Ikram; Harry L A Janssen; Caroline C W Klaver; Ernst J Kuipers; Tamar E C Nijsten; Bruno H Ch Stricker; Henning Tiemeier; André G Uitterlinden; Meike W Vernooij; Jacqueline C M Witteman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 4.  Cardiovascular and metabolic influences of fetal smoke exposure.

Authors:  Hanneke Bakker; Vincent W V Jaddoe
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  Facilitating Development Research: Suggestions for Recruiting and Re-Recruiting Children and Families.

Authors:  Lisa B Hurwitz; Kelly L Schmitt; Megan K Olsen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-09-11

6.  Re-engaging an inactive cohort of young adults: evaluating recruitment for the Kidskin Young Adult Myopia Study.

Authors:  Gareth Lingham; David A Mackey; Nicola Seed; Lisa Ryan; Elizabeth Milne; Robyn M Lucas; Maria Franchina; Samantha Sze-Yee Lee; Seyhan Yazar
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 4.615

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.