Literature DB >> 14607809

Using publicly available directories to trace survey nonresponders and calculate adjusted response rates.

Bart J Harvey1, Annette L Wilkins, Gillian A Hawker, Elizabeth M Badley, Peter C Coyte, Richard H Glazier, J Ivan Williams, James G Wright.   

Abstract

In population-based surveys, sample lists are often out of date by the time data collection begins. Consequently, response rates, and the perceived validity of the survey, may be compromised by the unknowing inclusion of ineligible subjects. A strategy to address this issue is ascertainment of survey nonrespondents' eligibility status, enabling post hoc adjustment of response rates. In 1995-1996, population surveys were carried out in two Ontario, Canada, communities. Despite intensive follow-up, the status of 8949 (18.6%) of the 48218 potential subjects in these surveys remained unknown. In response, 500 "unknowns" from each community were randomly selected for tracing by using publicly available telephone directories and, where applicable, city directories. These tracing efforts classified persons into one of three groups: "ineligible" (moved before the mailing), "true nonresponder" (present when the survey was mailed), and "remains unknown" (no directory listing found). Publicly available directories clarified the status of 76.0% of potential participants, reducing the proportion of "unknowns" from 18.6% to 4.6%. Applying the estimated proportions of "ineligibles" from each area resulted in response rates adjusted from 63.8% to 71.2% and from 72.8% to 74.9% in the survey areas. Publicly available directories were used to successfully trace the majority of survey nonresponders, thus strengthening confidence in the survey's results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14607809     DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwg240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  4 in total

1.  Predictors of locating children participants in epidemiological studies 20 years after last contact: Internet resources and longitudinal research.

Authors:  Caroline P Barakat-Haddad; Susan J Elliott; John Eyles; David Pengelly
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Promoting regular mammography screening I. A systematic assessment of validity in a randomized trial.

Authors:  Deborah J del Junco; Sally W Vernon; Sharon P Coan; Jasmin A Tiro; Lori A Bastian; Lara S Savas; Catherine A Perz; David R Lairson; Wen Chan; Cynthia Warrick; Amy McQueen; William Rakowski
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Would loss to follow-up bias the outcome evaluation of patients operated for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine?

Authors:  Tore K Solberg; Andreas Sørlie; Kristin Sjaavik; Øystein P Nygaard; Tor Ingebrigtsen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 3.717

4.  Predictors of locating women six to eight years after contact: internet resources at recruitment may help to improve response rates in longitudinal research.

Authors:  Suzanne M Cadarette; Leigh Dickson; Monique A M Gignac; Dorcas E Beaton; Susan B Jaglal; Gillian A Hawker
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 4.615

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.