Literature DB >> 19562040

On Linear Infeasibility Arising in Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Inverse Planning.

Yair Censor1, Adi Ben-Israel, Ying Xiao, James M Galvin.   

Abstract

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) gives rise to systems of linear inequalities, representing the effects of radiation on the irradiated body. These systems are often infeasible, in which case one settles for an approximate solution, such as an {α, β}-relaxation, meaning that no more than α percent of the inequalities are violated by no more than β percent. For real-world IMRT problems, there is a feasible {α, β}-relaxation for sufficiently large α, β > 0, however large values of these parameters may be unacceptable medically.The {α, β}-relaxation problem is combinatorial, and for given values of the parameters can be solved exactly by Mixed Integer Programming (MIP), but this may be impractical because of problem size, and the need for repeated solutions as the treatment progresses.As a practical alternative to the MIP approach we present a heuristic non-combinatorial method for finding an approximate relaxation. The method solves a Linear Program (LP) for each pair of values of the parameters {α, β} and progresses through successively increasing values until an acceptable solution is found, or is determined non-existent. The method is fast and reliable, since it consists of solving a sequence of LP's.

Year:  2008        PMID: 19562040      PMCID: PMC2701713          DOI: 10.1016/j.laa.2007.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Linear Algebra Appl        ISSN: 0024-3795            Impact factor:   1.401


  11 in total

1.  Hardware-sensitive optimization for intensity modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  P S Cho; R J Marks
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Optimization of radiosurgery treatment planning via mixed integer programming.

Authors:  E K Lee; T Fox; I Crocker
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  A novel linear programming approach to fluence map optimization for intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment planning.

Authors:  H Edwin Romeijn; Ravindra K Ahuja; James F Dempsey; Arvind Kumar; Jonathan G Li
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  The use of mixed-integer programming for inverse treatment planning with pre-defined field segments.

Authors:  Greg Bednarz; Darek Michalski; Chris Houser; M Saiful Huq; Ying Xiao; Pramila Rani Anne; James M Galvin
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2002-07-07       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Designing radiotherapy plans with elastic constraints and interior point methods.

Authors:  Allen Holder
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2003-02

6.  Inherent smoothness of intensity patterns for intensity modulated radiation therapy generated by simultaneous projection algorithms.

Authors:  Ying Xiao; Darek Michalski; Yair Censor; James M Galvin
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-07-21       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  The dose-volume constraint satisfaction problem for inverse treatment planning with field segments.

Authors:  Darek Michalski; Ying Xiao; Yair Censor; James M Galvin
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-02-21       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 8.  IMRT: a review and preview.

Authors:  Thomas Bortfeld
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  A comparison of mixed integer programming and fast simulated annealing for optimizing beam weights in radiation therapy.

Authors:  M Langer; S Morrill; R Brown; O Lee; R Lane
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  A gradient inverse planning algorithm with dose-volume constraints.

Authors:  S V Spirou; C S Chui
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  1 in total

1.  Sparsity constrained split feasibility for dose-volume constraints in inverse planning of intensity-modulated photon or proton therapy.

Authors:  Scott Penfold; Rafał Zalas; Margherita Casiraghi; Mark Brooke; Yair Censor; Reinhard Schulte
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.609

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.