Literature DB >> 19561450

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) as an ancillary diagnostic tool in the diagnosis of melanoma.

Pedram Gerami1, Susan S Jewell, Larry E Morrison, Beth Blondin, John Schulz, Teresa Ruffalo, Paul Matushek, Mona Legator, Kristine Jacobson, Scott R Dalton, Susan Charzan, Nicholas A Kolaitis, Joan Guitart, Terakeith Lertsbarapa, Susan Boone, Philip E LeBoit, Boris C Bastian.   

Abstract

Although the clinical and pathologic diagnosis of some melanomas is clear-cut, there are many histopathologic simulators of melanoma that pose problems. Over-diagnosis of melanoma can lead to inappropriate therapy and psychologic burdens, whereas under-diagnosis can lead to inadequate treatment of a deadly cancer. We used existing data on DNA copy number alterations in melanoma to assemble panels of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probes suitable for the analysis of paraffin-embedded tissue. Using FISH data from a training set of 301 tumors, we established a discriminatory algorithm and validated it on an independent set of 169 unequivocal nevi and melanomas as well as 27 cases with ambiguous pathology, for which we had long-term follow-up data. An algorithm-using signal counts from a combination of 4 probes targeting chromosome 6p25, 6 centromere, 6q23, and 11q13 provided the highest diagnostic discrimination. This algorithm correctly classified melanoma with 86.7% sensitivity and 95.4% specificity in the validation cohort. The test also correctly identified as melanoma all 6 of 6 cases with ambiguous pathology that later metastasized. There was a significant difference in the metastasis free survival between test-positive and negative cases with ambiguous pathology (P=0.003). Sufficient chromosomal alterations are present in melanoma that a limited panel of FISH probes can distinguish most melanomas from most nevi, providing useful diagnostic information in cases that cannot be classified reliably by current methods. As a diagnostic aid to traditional histologic evaluation, this assay can have significant clinical impact and improve classification of melanocytic neoplasms with conflicting morphologic criteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19561450     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181a1ef36

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  64 in total

Review 1.  Melanoma: from patient presentation to pathology report.

Authors:  Omar W Jassim; Anne C Lind
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr

2.  Copy number gains in 11q13 and 8q24 [corrected] are highly linked to prognosis in cutaneous malignant melanoma.

Authors:  Pedram Gerami; Susan S Jewell; Pedram Pouryazdanparast; Jeffery D Wayne; Zahra Haghighat; Klaus J Busam; Alfred Rademaker; Larry Morrison
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.568

3.  Loss of inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase is an early event in development of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Aleksandar Sekulic; Su Y Kim; Galen Hostetter; Stephanie Savage; Janine G Einspahr; Anil Prasad; Paul Sagerman; Clara Curiel-Lewandrowski; Robert Krouse; G Timothy Bowden; James Warneke; David S Alberts; Mark R Pittelkow; David DiCaudo; Brian J Nickoloff; Jeffrey M Trent; Michael Bittner
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2010-09-28

4.  microRNA in situ hybridization for miR-211 detection as an ancillary test in melanoma diagnosis.

Authors:  Sankhiros Babapoor; Michael Horwich; Rong Wu; Shauna Levinson; Manoj Gandhi; Hanspaul Makkar; Arni Kristjansson; Mary Chang; Soheil S Dadras
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 7.842

5.  Imaging mass spectrometry: a new tool for pathology in a molecular age.

Authors:  Jeremy L Norris; Richard M Caprioli
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 6.  A diagnostic algorithm for atypical spitzoid tumors: guidelines for immunohistochemical and molecular assessment.

Authors:  Jeong Hee Cho-Vega
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 7.  Review of diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers in melanoma.

Authors:  Jacob S Ankeny; Brian Labadie; Jason Luke; Eddy Hsueh; Jane Messina; Jonathan S Zager
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 8.  [Molecular diagnostics of melanomas].

Authors:  K G Griewank
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 9.  Through the looking glass and what you find there: making sense of comparative genomic hybridization and fluorescence in situ hybridization for melanoma diagnosis.

Authors:  Jayson Miedema; Aleodor A Andea
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 7.842

10.  Use of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to distinguish intranodal nevus from metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  Scott R Dalton; Pedram Gerami; Nicholas A Kolaitis; Susan Charzan; Rob Werling; Philip E LeBoit; Boris C Bastian
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.394

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.