Literature DB >> 19560642

Double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a non-hardware suspension fixation technique and 8 strands of autogenous hamstring tendons.

Baicheng Chen1, Shijun Gao.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction using a non-hardware suspension fixation technique and 8 strands of autogenous hamstring tendons.
METHODS: Twenty-two cases of isolated chronic PCL rupture were reconstructed arthroscopically with 8 strands of autogenous hamstring tendons in a double-bundle and 4-tunnel manner. Quadruple-stranded semitendinosus tendon graft and quadruple-stranded gracilis tendon graft were used to reconstruct the anterolateral bundle and posteromedial bundle, respectively. The grafts were fixed by use of a non-hardware suspension fixation technique.
RESULTS: Nineteen patients were followed up for a minimum of 2 years. Before surgery, 15 patients had a 2+ posterior drawer test (PDT) and 4 patients had a 3+ PDT. At a minimum of 2 years after surgery, 17 patients (89.5%) had a negative PDT, 1 patient (5.3%) had a 1+ PDT, and 1 patient (5.3%) had a 2+ PDT. The mean KT-1000 examination results (MEDmetric, San Diego, CA) changed from 9.4 +/- 1.8 mm preoperatively to 1.0 +/- 1.0 mm postoperatively (P < .001). The stress radiography results changed from 10.6 +/- 2.0 mm preoperatively to 2.0 +/- 1.2 mm postoperatively (P < .001). According to the International Knee Documentation Committee knee examination form, the results were graded as normal in 15 patients (78.9%), nearly normal in 3 patients (15.8%), and abnormal in 1 patient (5.3%). The International Knee Documentation Committee subjective results increased from 65.6 +/- 5.1 to 92.1 +/- 3.7 (P < .001), and the Lysholm score increased from 63.5 +/- 4.9 to 92.5 +/- 4.1 (P < .001). The Tegner score was 5.1 before surgery and 6.3 at the last follow-up on average.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study showed that arthroscopic double-bundle PCL reconstruction by use of a non-hardware suspension suture fixation technique and 8 strands of autogenous hamstring tendons can yield normal results in 78.9% of patients and nearly normal results in 15.8% at a minimum of 2 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19560642     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.01.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  14 in total

Review 1.  Posterior tibial translation resulting from the posterior drawer manoeuver in cadaveric knee specimens: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marcin Kowalczuk; Marie-Claude Leblanc; Benjamin B Rothrauff; Richard E Debski; Volker Musahl; Nicole Simunovic; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstring Tendons Using a Suspensory Device for Tibial Fixation and Interference Screw for Femoral Fixation.

Authors:  Alejandro Espejo-Baena; Alejandro Espejo-Reina; María Josefa Espejo-Reina; Maximiano Lombardo-Torre
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-02-20

3.  All-Anterior Approach for Arthroscopic Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Remnant Preservation.

Authors:  Tianwu Chen; Shaohua Liu; Jiwu Chen
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2016-10-24

4.  Attachments of separate small bundles of human posterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic study.

Authors:  Daisuke Hatsushika; Akimoto Nimura; Tomoyuki Mochizuki; Kumiko Yamaguchi; Takeshi Muneta; Keiichi Akita
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Augmentation or reconstruction of PCL? A quantitative review.

Authors:  Angelo Del Buono; Juri Radmilovic; Giuseppe Gargano; Salvatore Gatto; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-02-02       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Global variation in isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Derrick M Knapik; Varun Gopinatth; Garrett R Jackson; Jorge Chahla; Matthew V Smith; Matthew J Matava; Robert H Brophy
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2022-10-09

7.  REHABILITATION FOLLOWING ISOLATED POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION: A LITERATURE REVIEW OF PUBLISHED PROTOCOLS.

Authors:  Matthew Senese; Elliot Greenberg; J Todd Lawrence; Theodore Ganley
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2018-08

8.  Evaluation of the clinical results of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction -a comparison between the use of the bone tendon bone and semitendinosus and gracilis tendons-.

Authors:  Yuichiro Maruyama; Katsuo Shitoto; Tomonori Baba; Kazuo Kaneko
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol       Date:  2012-08-29

Review 9.  Optimal management of posterior cruciate ligament injuries: current perspectives.

Authors:  K Donald Shelbourne; Rodney W Benner; Jonathan D Ringenberg; Tinker Gray
Journal:  Orthop Res Rev       Date:  2017-04-05

10.  POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION WITH AUTOGRAFT OF THE DOUBLE SEMITENDINOSUS MUSCLES AND MIDDLE THIRD OF THE QUADRICEPS TENDON WITH DOUBLE FEMORAL AND SINGLE TIBIAL TUNNELS: CLINICAL RESULTS IN TWO YEARS FOLLOW UP.

Authors:  Ricardo de Paula Leite Cury; Nilson Roberto Severino; Osmar Pedro Arbix Camargo; Tatsuo Aihara; Victor Marques de Oliveira; Roger Avakian
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-11-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.