Literature DB >> 19560255

A comparison of postoperative complications in open versus robotic cystectomy.

Casey K Ng1, Eric C Kauffman, Ming-Ming Lee, Brandon J Otto, Alyse Portnoff, Josh R Ehrlich, Michael J Schwartz, Gerald J Wang, Douglas S Scherr.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Robotic cystectomy is an emerging alternative for treatment of invasive bladder cancer (BCa). However, reduction in postoperative morbidity relative to the open approach has not been demonstrated.
OBJECTIVE: To compare complication rates in patients undergoing robotic versus open radical cystectomy (RC). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A prospective cohort study of 187 consecutive patients undergoing RC at our institution-104 open RC, 83 robotic RC. INTERVENTION: Open or robotic RC with urinary diversion. MEASUREMENTS: Demographic, perioperative, and complication data were recorded prospectively. Thirty-day and 90-d complication rates were assessed using the modified Clavien complication scale. Data were evaluated using chi(2) and multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: At 30 d, the open group demonstrated a higher overall complication rate (59% vs 41%; p=0.04) as well as more major complications (30% vs 10%; p=0.007). At 90 d, the overall complication rate was greater in the open group, but this was not statistically significant (62% vs 48%; p=0.07). However, there was a significantly higher major complication rate in the open cohort (31% vs 17%; p=0.03). When subjected to logistic regression analysis, robotic cystectomy was an independent predictor of fewer overall and major complications at 30 and 90 d. High American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (3-4) and longer surgical time were independent predictors of major complications. Though this is one of the largest published RC series, the sample size is relatively small. Moreover, despite the two patient cohorts being similarly matched, the study was not performed in a randomized fashion.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing robotic cystectomy experienced fewer postoperative complications than those undergoing open cystectomy. Robotic cystectomy is an independent predictor of fewer overall and major complications. Until long-term oncologic results are available, robotic cystectomy should still be considered investigational. Copyright 2009 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19560255     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  64 in total

1.  Bladder cancer: Fewer complications after robotic cystectomy?

Authors:  Rebecca Drake
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  Current status and outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy and urinary diversion.

Authors:  Kyle A Richards; Ashok K Hemal
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  [Robot-assisted radical cystectomy: do we actually need a robot?].

Authors:  G Niegisch; P Albers; R Rabenalt
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Status of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy (RARC) in 2012.

Authors:  Amrith R Rao; Andrew P Stegemann; Shabnam Rehman; Michael A Poch; Dawn Green; Khurshid A Guru
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-02-16

5.  Peri-operative allogeneic blood transfusion and outcomes after radical cystectomy: a population-based study.

Authors:  D Robert Siemens; Melanie T Jaeger; Xuejiao Wei; Francisco Vera-Badillo; Christopher M Booth
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Peri-operative efficacy and long-term survival benefit of robotic-assisted radical cystectomy in septuagenarian patients compared with younger patients: a nationwide multi-institutional study in Japan.

Authors:  Hideto Iwamoto; Shuichi Morizane; Takuya Koie; Ryoichi Shiroki; Mutsushi Kawakita; Tatsuo Gondo; Kazumasa Matsumoto; Tomonori Habuchi; Hiroshi Sunada; Yusuke Endo; Hisashi Noma; Atsushi Takenaka; Hiroomi Kanayama
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Robotic-assisted paraesophageal hernia repair--a case-control study.

Authors:  Tobias Gehrig; A Mehrabi; L Fischer; H Kenngott; U Hinz; C N Gutt; Beat P Müller-Stich
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Oncologic outcomes between open and robotic-assisted radical cystectomy: a propensity score matched analysis.

Authors:  Michael Ahdoot; Leanne Almario; Hiwot Araya; Jonas Busch; Simon Conti; Mark L Gonzalgo
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Readmission after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: outcomes and predictors at 90-day follow-up.

Authors:  Ali Al-Daghmin; Ahmed Aboumohamed; Rakeeba Din; Aabroo Khan; Syed Johar Raza; Jenna Sztorc; Diana Mehedint; Mohammad Sharif; Yi Shi; Gregory Wilding; Khurshid A Guru
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Long-term evaluation of oncologic and functional outcomes after laparoscopic open-assisted radical cystectomy: a matched-pair analysis.

Authors:  Simone Albisinni; Ksenija Limani; Lisa Ingels; Felix Kwizera; Renaud Bollens; Eric Hawaux; Thierry Quackels; Marc Vanden Bossche; Alexandre Peltier; Thierry Roumeguère; Roland van Velthoven
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.