Literature DB >> 19560083

Vectorcardiographic determinants of cardiac memory during normal ventricular activation and continuous ventricular pacing.

Alexei Shvilkin1, Bosko Bojovic, Branislav Vajdic, Ihor Gussak, Peter Zimetbaum, Mark E Josephson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiac memory (CM) refers to persistent T-wave changes on resumption of normal conduction after a period of abnormal ventricular activation. Traditionally, to observe CM, normal ventricular activation had to be restored, limiting the exploration of this phenomenon in clinical practice.
OBJECTIVE: This study sought to prove that CM can be detected during continuous aberrant activation and to establish factors affecting its magnitude using a vectorcardiographic technique.
METHODS: Sixteen nonpacemaker-dependent patients (11 male, age 72 +/- 8 years, mean +/- SD) undergoing pacemaker/internal cardioverter-defibrillator implantation were paced in DDD mode with a short atrioventricular (AV) delay for 7 days to induce CM. Electrocardiograms were acquired during AAI and DDD pacing at a constant rate before and after CM induction. Dower transform-derived vectorcardiograms were reconstructed and analyzed.
RESULTS: T vector during AAI pacing changed in both magnitude (baseline, 0.26 +/- 0.10 mV; Day 7, 0.39 +/- 0.13 mV, P < .01) and direction aligning with the paced QRS vector (baseline DDD QRS - AAI T angle 125 degrees +/- 36 degrees; Day 7, 39 degrees +/- 21 degrees, P < .01). During DDD pacing, there was no change in T-vector direction, but T amplitude decreased (baseline, 1.06 +/- 0.32 mV; Day 7, 0.71 +/- 0.26 mV, P < .01). CM measured as T-vector peak displacement (TPD) was identical in AAI and DDD mode (TPD 0.46 +/- .0.17 mV and 0.46 +/- 0.17 mV, respectively). Individual CM magnitude correlated with QRS/T-vector amplitude ratio during DDD pacing at baseline (r = 0.90).
CONCLUSION: CM can be reliably shown during continuous ventricular pacing, expanding its application to situations in which abnormal ventricular activation persists. Its magnitude is determined by the QRS/T-amplitude ratio of the ventricular paced beat.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19560083     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.03.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  9 in total

1.  Repolarization changes underlying long-term cardiac memory due to right ventricular pacing: noninvasive mapping with electrocardiographic imaging.

Authors:  Scott B Marrus; Christopher M Andrews; Daniel H Cooper; Mitchell N Faddis; Yoram Rudy
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-07-06

2.  Diffuse inverted T waves in a young man with structurally normal heart: a case report.

Authors:  Bita Omidvar; Shahla Majidi; Mehrdad Raadi; Mohammad Alasti
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Manifest cardiac memory after biventricular pacing in a super-responder patient: Is memory the sign of a 'forgotten' electrical ventricular pattern?

Authors:  Andrea Di Cori; Giulio Zucchelli; Ezio Soldati; Maria Grazia Bongiorni
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2011-08-27

4.  Construction of intracardiac vectorcardiogram from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator intracardiac electrograms.

Authors:  Elyar Ghafoori; Muammar M Kabir; Jian Cao; Alexei Shvilkin; Larisa G Tereshchenko
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 1.438

5.  Cardiac memory in humans: vectocardiographic quantification in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Luigi Padeletti; Chiara Fantappiè; Laura Perrotta; Giuseppe Ricciardi; Paolo Pieragnoli; Marco Chiostri; Sergio Valsecchi; Maria Cristina Porciani; Antonio Michelucci; Fabio Fantini
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2010-09-04       Impact factor: 5.460

6.  Electrophysiological ventricular substrate of stroke: a prospective cohort study in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study.

Authors:  John A Johnson; Kazi T Haq; Katherine J Lutz; Kyle K Peters; Kevin A Paternostro; Natalie E Craig; Nathan W L Stencel; Lila F Hawkinson; Maedeh Khayyat-Kholghi; Larisa G Tereshchenko
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 3.006

7.  Sympathetic activity-associated periodic repolarization dynamics predict mortality following myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Konstantinos D Rizas; Tuomo Nieminen; Petra Barthel; Christine S Zürn; Mika Kähönen; Jari Viik; Terho Lehtimäki; Kjell Nikus; Christian Eick; Tim O Greiner; Hans P Wendel; Peter Seizer; Jürgen Schreieck; Meinrad Gawaz; Georg Schmidt; Axel Bauer
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Beat-to-beat vectorcardiographic analysis of ventricular depolarization and repolarization in myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Muhammad A Hasan; Derek Abbott; Mathias Baumert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Synchronization of repolarization after cardiac resynchronization therapy: A combined clinical and modeling study.

Authors:  Nienke J Verzaal; Caroline J M van Deursen; Simone Pezzuto; Liliane Wecke; Wouter M van Everdingen; Kevin Vernooy; Tammo Delhaas; Angelo Auricchio; Frits W Prinzen
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 2.942

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.