BACKGROUND: Most patient chronic disease self-management interventions target single-disease outcomes. We evaluated the effect of a tailored hypertension self-management intervention on the unintended targets of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). METHODS: We evaluated patients from the Veterans Study to Improve the Control of Hypertension, a 2-year randomized controlled trial. Patients received either a hypertension self-management intervention delivered by a nurse over the telephone or usual care. Although the study focused on hypertension self-management, we compared changes in HbA1c among a subgroup of 216 patients with diabetes and LDL-C among 528 patients with measurements during the study period. Changes in these laboratory values over time were compared between the 2 treatment groups using linear mixed-effects models. RESULTS: For the patients with diabetes, the hypertension self-management intervention resulted in a 0.46% reduction in HbA1c over 2 years compared with usual care (95% confidence interval, 0.04%-0.89%; P = .03). For LDL-C, there was a minimal 0.9 mg/dL between-group difference that was not statistically significant (95% confidence interval, -7.3-5.6 mg/dL; P = .79). CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant effect of the self-management intervention on the unintended target of HbA1c, but not LDL-C. Chronic disease self-management interventions might have "spill-over" effects on patients' comorbid chronic conditions.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Most patientchronic disease self-management interventions target single-disease outcomes. We evaluated the effect of a tailored hypertension self-management intervention on the unintended targets of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). METHODS: We evaluated patients from the Veterans Study to Improve the Control of Hypertension, a 2-year randomized controlled trial. Patients received either a hypertension self-management intervention delivered by a nurse over the telephone or usual care. Although the study focused on hypertension self-management, we compared changes in HbA1c among a subgroup of 216 patients with diabetes and LDL-C among 528 patients with measurements during the study period. Changes in these laboratory values over time were compared between the 2 treatment groups using linear mixed-effects models. RESULTS: For the patients with diabetes, the hypertension self-management intervention resulted in a 0.46% reduction in HbA1c over 2 years compared with usual care (95% confidence interval, 0.04%-0.89%; P = .03). For LDL-C, there was a minimal 0.9 mg/dL between-group difference that was not statistically significant (95% confidence interval, -7.3-5.6 mg/dL; P = .79). CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant effect of the self-management intervention on the unintended target of HbA1c, but not LDL-C. Chronic disease self-management interventions might have "spill-over" effects on patients' comorbid chronic conditions.
Authors: Rod Jackson; Carlene M M Lawes; Derrick A Bennett; Richard J Milne; Anthony Rodgers Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 Jan 29-Feb 4 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: T M Damush; G L Jackson; B J Powers; H B Bosworth; E Cheng; J Anderson; M Guihan; S LaVela; S Rajan; L Plue Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Bonnie J Wakefield; Richelle J Koopman; Lynn E Keplinger; Marilee Bomar; Beth Bernt; Jennifer L Johanning; Robin L Kruse; J Wade Davis; Douglas S Wakefield; David R Mehr Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2014-01-03 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Sarah L Reeves; Gary L Freed; Brian Madden; Meng Wu; Lauren Miller; Lindsay Cogan; David Anders; Susan E Creary; Julie McCormick; Kevin J Dombkowski Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2021-12-02 Impact factor: 3.838
Authors: Krista K Proia; Anilkrishna B Thota; Gibril J Njie; Ramona K C Finnie; David P Hopkins; Qaiser Mukhtar; Nicolaas P Pronk; Donald Zeigler; Thomas E Kottke; Kimberly J Rask; Daniel T Lackland; Joy F Brooks; Lynne T Braun; Tonya Cooksey Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2014-06-02 Impact factor: 5.043