Literature DB >> 19559106

Evaluating routine diagnostic imaging in acute appendicitis.

C Unlü1, S M M de Castro, J B Tuynman, A F Wüst, E Ph Steller, B A van Wagensveld.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the impact of selective imaging on clinical management of patients who present with symptoms suggesting acute appendicitis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: During a two-and-half year period, 941 consecutive patients with right lower quadrant pain were analyzed. Patients who underwent selective imaging were compared to those treated without further imaging.
RESULTS: In 650 (69%) patients with right lower quadrant pain, diagnosis was based on medical history, physical and laboratory examination only. The diagnostic accuracy was 84%. Another 291 patients (31%) underwent selective imaging reaching a diagnostic accuracy of 71%. Ultrasound was conducted in 277 patients (sensitivity: 59%; specificity: 91%). CT scan was conducted in 43 patients (sensitivity: 100%; specificity: 95%).
CONCLUSION: The present study shows that, in the majority of patients, appendicitis acuta can be diagnosed without the aid of imaging studies. In all these cases, high diagnostic accuracy rates and low morbidity rates were achieved. In all the other cases when clinical diagnosis is uncertain, further evaluation should include imaging. In our series ultrasound is of limited value; CT scan or diagnostic laparoscopy seems superior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19559106     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg        ISSN: 1743-9159            Impact factor:   6.071


  5 in total

1.  Increased use of pre-operative imaging and laparoscopy has no impact on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing appendicectomy.

Authors:  S R Markar; A Karthikesalingam; J Cunningham; C Burd; G Bond-Smith; T R Kurzawinski
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Value of polyclonal human immunoglobulin tagged with ⁹⁹mTc for detecting acute appendicitis in patients with intermediate probability of appendicitis.

Authors:  Mehdi Asadi; Mostafa Mehrabi Bahar; Ramin Sadeghi; Ali Jangjo; Vahidreza Dabbagh Kakhki; Seyed Rasoul Zakavi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Acute Appendicitis in the Adult Population: Modelled Decision Analysis Supports a Conservative Approach.

Authors:  Jarlath Christopher Bolger; Michael Eamon Kelly; Kevin Barry
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Evaluation of the appendicitis inflammatory response score for patients with acute appendicitis.

Authors:  S M M de Castro; C Ünlü; E Ph Steller; B A van Wagensveld; B C Vrouenraets
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Computed tomography for diagnosis of acute appendicitis in adults.

Authors:  Bo Rud; Thomas S Vejborg; Eli D Rappeport; Johannes B Reitsma; Peer Wille-Jørgensen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-11-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.