Literature DB >> 1955815

Distinguishing between haloperidol's and decamethonium's disruptive effects on operant behavior in rats: use of measurements that complement response rate.

S C Fowler1, P D Skjoldager, R M Liao, J M Chase, J S Johnson.   

Abstract

The behavioral effects of haloperidol (0.04 to 0.16 mg/kg) and nonparalytic doses of decamethonium (0.2 to 0.8 mg/kg) were studied with operant methods that permitted the measurement of response rate, peak force of response, duration of response, and duration of the rat's head entry into the reinforcement dipper well. Type of operant response topography (forelimb press or forelimb grasp-and-pull) and peak force (low or high) required for reinforcement delivery were independent variables. The low-force, press-topography condition yielded qualitatively different profiles for the two drugs. Haloperidol increased peak force and duration of operant response, increased maximum head entry duration, and temporally dissociated forelimb and head entry behavior. Decamethonium decreased force and duration of operant response, did not appreciably affect maximum head entry duration, and did not influence the normal temporal coupling of forelimb and head entry responses. The haloperidol effects were seen as reflections of pseudo-Parkinsonism, not muscle weakness, which appeared to be the primary source of decamethonium's behavioral effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1955815      PMCID: PMC1323100          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1991.56-239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  19 in total

Review 1.  The role of discriminative stimuli in modulating drug action.

Authors:  V G Laties
Journal:  Fed Proc       Date:  1975-08

2.  An analysis of chlorpromazine-induced suppression of the avoidance response.

Authors:  D POSLUNS
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1962-10-31

3.  Effects of haloperidol on the biophysical characteristics of operant responding: implications for motor and reinforcement processes.

Authors:  S C Fowler; M M LaCerra; A Ettenberg
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.533

4.  The form of the auto-shaped response with food or water reinforcers.

Authors:  H M Jenkins; B R Moore
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Behavior-decrementing effects of low doses of haloperidol result from disruptions in response force and duration.

Authors:  S.C. Fowler; M.A. Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.293

6.  Chlordiazepoxide increases the force of two topographically distinct operant responses in rats.

Authors:  S C Fowler; R M Lewis; S E Gramling; G L Nail
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.533

7.  Operant conditioning of hippocampal theta: dissociating reward from performance deficits.

Authors:  B D Fantie; S Nakajima
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  Do neuroleptics impair learning in schizophrenic patients?

Authors:  T R Cutmore; R J Beninger
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  1990 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Time course of chronic haloperidol and clozapine upon operant rate and duration.

Authors:  W Faustman; S Fowler; C Walker
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1981-03-05       Impact factor: 4.432

10.  Temporal ordering and short-term memory deficits in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  H J Sagar; E V Sullivan; J D Gabrieli; S Corkin; J H Growdon
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  A review of the discovery, pharmacological characterization, and behavioral effects of the dopamine D2-like receptor antagonist eticlopride.

Authors:  Jennifer L Martelle; Michael A Nader
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.243

2.  CB1 antagonism produces behaviors more consistent with satiety than reduced reward value in food-maintained responding in rats.

Authors:  Emily E Thompson; Julia E Jagielo-Miller; V Kiran Vemuri; Alexandros Makriyannis; Peter J McLaughlin
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 4.153

3.  Microcatalepsy and disruption of forelimb usage during operant behavior: differences between dopamine D1 (SCH-23390) and D2 (raclopride) antagonists.

Authors:  S C Fowler; J R Liou
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Unlike haloperidol, clozapine slows and dampens rats' forelimb force oscillations and decreases force output in a press-while-licking behavioral task.

Authors:  S C Fowler; K H Davison; J A Stanford
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.530

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.