Literature DB >> 19557464

[Urine-based tumour diagnostics for bladder cancer: effects of the new histopathological classification--food for thought].

R Knüchel1, K Lindemann-Docter.   

Abstract

The new WHO classification of bladder cancer was published in 2004 and consequently cannot be regarded as very recent. However, it is still timely since it picks up considerations affecting other schemes of tumour classification as well. Genetic results are included in the context of morphology, and at the same time a high inter- and intra-observer agreement is striven for as a matter of high quality patient care. The WHO classification of 2004 does not include cytological diagnosis. Thinking about and considering tumour tissue diagnosis, the style of cytological diagnoses is also affected. For tissue diagnoses, low- and high-grade tumours are differentiated from benign lesions including reactive changes. The element of this classification which has to be transferred to cytology is especially the unequivocal diagnosis of high-grade lesions. The low-grade lesion, correlating with tissue of well-differentiated papillary tumours and dysplasias, mostly cannot be distinguished cytologically with certainty from a broad spectrum of non-malignant lesions (papillomas, reactive urothelial detachment in urolithiasis patients, cytology specimen from vigorously irrigated bladders). For the latter group our aim should be to establish an additional diagnostic tool of high quality driven by clinical questions (e.g. potential of tumour progression).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19557464     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-009-1988-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  8 in total

1.  Multiprobe FISH for enhanced detection of bladder cancer in voided urine specimens and bladder washings.

Authors:  L Bubendorf; B Grilli; G Sauter; M J Mihatsch; T C Gasser; P Dalquen
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  An international telecytologic quiz on urinary cytology reveals educational deficits and absence of a commonly used classification system.

Authors:  Katharina Glatz; Niels Willi; Dieter Glatz; Audrey Barascud; Bruno Grilli; Michelle Herzog; Peter Dalquen; Georg Feichter; Thomas C Gasser; Tullio Sulser; Lukas Bubendorf
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  What's the trouble with cytology?

Authors:  William M Murphy
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Comment on: Anatomic and hemodynamic evaluation of renal venous flow in varicocele formation using color Doppler sonography with emphasis on renal vein entrapment syndrome (Scand J Urol Nephrol 2007; 41(1): 42-6).

Authors:  Jae Il Shin; Jae Seung Lee
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008

Review 5.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization: a multitarget approach in diagnosis and management of urothelial cancer.

Authors:  Harm C Arentsen; Jean J M C H de la Rosette; Theo M de Reijke; Sigrun Langbein
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.225

6.  Natural history of urothelial dysplasia of the bladder.

Authors:  L Cheng; J C Cheville; R M Neumann; D G Bostwick
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.394

7.  [Histopathology of urothelial carcinomas: crucial for patient management].

Authors:  K Lindemann-Docter; R Knüchel-Clarke
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 8.  [Urine-based diagnostics: an update on the Kiel Tumor Bank].

Authors:  S Hautmann; V B L Lokeshwar; K P Juenemann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 0.639

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  [Urine markers with special regard to fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)].

Authors:  K Lindemann-Docter; N T Gaisa; D Smeets; R Knüchel-Clarke
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 0.639

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.