Literature DB >> 16891206

An international telecytologic quiz on urinary cytology reveals educational deficits and absence of a commonly used classification system.

Katharina Glatz1, Niels Willi, Dieter Glatz, Audrey Barascud, Bruno Grilli, Michelle Herzog, Peter Dalquen, Georg Feichter, Thomas C Gasser, Tullio Sulser, Lukas Bubendorf.   

Abstract

Urinary cytology is limited by high interobserver variability in the evaluation of cells with little atypia. We set up an online quiz on urinary cytology and tested the performance of 246 international participants. The quiz consisted of still images of 42 urinary specimens with equivocal morphologic features and 10 control cases with an unequivocal cytologic diagnosis. The nature of the cells on the 292 quiz images had been verified by multitarget fluorescence in situ hybridization in addition to the information obtained by cystoscopy, clinical follow up, and/or histologic examination. The original quiz cases and the percentage of answers given by the participants can be viewed at: http://kathrin.unibas.ch/urinzyto/. High-grade cancers were diagnosed correctly in 76.0% and low-grade cancers in only 33.9%. Remarkably, 54.5% of all participants misclassified decoy cells as malignant. This study shows that large-scale international online quizzes may be used to find educational deficits in cytopathology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16891206     DOI: 10.1309/6396-QUBU-6HEJ-BMPL

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  16 in total

1.  [Cytology in the internet].

Authors:  K Glatz; L Bubendorf; D Glatz
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 2.  [Urine cytology - update 2013. A systematic review of recent literature].

Authors:  M Böhm; F vom Dorp; M Schostak; O W Hakenberg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  The Empirical Foundations of Telepathology: Evidence of Feasibility and Intermediate Effects.

Authors:  Rashid L Bashshur; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Ronald S Weinstein; Matthew R Dunn; Noura Bashshur
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 3.536

4.  [Urine cytology and urine markers. Significance for clinical practice].

Authors:  S Tritschler; D Zaak; R Knuechel; C G Stief
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  Expert consensus document: Consensus statement on best practice management regarding the use of intravesical immunotherapy with BCG for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Ashish M Kamat; Thomas W Flaig; H Barton Grossman; Badrinath Konety; Donald Lamm; Michael A O'Donnell; Edward Uchio; Jason A Efstathiou; John A Taylor
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  [The Paris system for classification of urinary cytology].

Authors:  S Savic; T Vlajnic; L Bubendorf
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.011

7.  Cytologic evaluation of image-guided fine needle aspiration biopsies via robotic microscopy: A validation study.

Authors:  Guoping Cai; Lisa A Teot; Walid E Khalbuss; Jing Yu; Sara E Monaco; Drazen M Jukic; Anil V Parwani
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2010-05-26

Review 8.  Urinary markers in screening patients with hematuria.

Authors:  Edmund Chiong; Kris E Gaston; H Barton Grossman
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 9.  [Cytology of the urinary tract: Between uncertainty and clarity].

Authors:  L Bubendorf; P Dalquen; S Savic
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 10.  [Urine-based tumour diagnostics for bladder cancer: effects of the new histopathological classification--food for thought].

Authors:  R Knüchel; K Lindemann-Docter
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 0.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.