Literature DB >> 19555834

Cardiac positron emission tomography.

Frank M Bengel1, Takahiro Higuchi, Mehrbod S Javadi, Riikka Lautamäki.   

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) is a powerful, quantitative imaging modality that has been used for decades to noninvasively investigate cardiovascular biology and physiology. Due to limited availability, methodologic complexity, and high costs, it has long been seen as a research tool and as a reference method for validation of other diagnostic approaches. This perception, fortunately, has changed significantly within recent years. Increasing diversity of therapeutic options for coronary artery disease, and increasing specificity of novel therapies for certain biologic pathways, has resulted in a clinical need for more accurate and specific diagnostic techniques. At the same time, the number of PET centers continues to grow, stimulated by PET's success in oncology. Methodologic advances as well as improved radiotracer availability have further contributed to more widespread use. Evidence for diagnostic and prognostic usefulness of myocardial perfusion and viability assessment by PET is increasing. Some studies suggest overall cost-effectiveness of the technique despite higher costs of a single study, because unnecessary follow-up procedures can be avoided. The advent of hybrid PET-computed tomography (CT), which enables integration of PET-derived biologic information with multislice CT-derived morphologic information, and the key role of PET in the development and translation of novel molecular-targeted imaging compounds, have further contributed to more widespread acceptance. Today, PET promises to play a leading diagnostic role on the pathway toward a future of high-powered, comprehensive, personalized, cardiovascular medicine. This review summarizes the state-of-the-art in current imaging methodology and clinical application, and outlines novel developments and future directions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19555834     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  78 in total

1.  ⁸²Rb PET/CT: entering a new area of myocardial perfusion imaging?

Authors:  Ines Valenta; Thomas Hellmut Schindler
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Diagnosis and prognosis of coronary artery disease: PET is superior to SPECT: Con.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Pathophysiologic correlates of 82Rb biodistribution in cardiac PET/CT.

Authors:  Tracy Lynnette Yarbrough Brown; Corina Voicu; Jennifer Merrill; Frank M Bengel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-10-09       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  ⁸²Rb PET myocardial perfusion imaging is superior to ⁹⁹mTc-labelled agent SPECT in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Albert Flotats; Paco E Bravo; Kenji Fukushima; Muhammad A Chaudhry; Jennifer Merrill; Frank M Bengel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Biological characterization of F-18-labeled rhodamine B, a potential positron emission tomography perfusion tracer.

Authors:  Mark D Bartholomä; Huamei He; Christina A Pacak; Patricia Dunning; Frederic H Fahey; Francis X McGowan; Douglas B Cowan; S Ted Treves; Alan B Packard
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 2.408

6.  Adding calcium scoring to myocardial perfusion imaging: Does it alter physicians' therapeutic decision making?

Authors:  Ron Blankstein; Sharmila Dorbala
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 7.  Coronary vasomotor function assessed by positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Nagara Tamaki; Keiichiro Yoshinaga; Masanao Naya
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Will cardiac positron emission tomography ultimately replace SPECT for myocardial perfusion imaging?

Authors:  George A Beller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Characterizing the normal range of myocardial blood flow with ⁸²rubidium and ¹³N-ammonia PET imaging.

Authors:  Jennifer M Renaud; Jean N DaSilva; Rob S B Beanlands; Robert A DeKemp
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Dexamethasone-induced insulin resistance: kinetic modeling using novel PET radiopharmaceutical 6-deoxy-6-[(18)F]fluoro-D-glucose.

Authors:  Kuan-Hao Su; Visvanathan Chandramouli; Faramarz Ismail-Beigi; Raymond F Muzic
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.488

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.