Literature DB >> 19885715

Will cardiac positron emission tomography ultimately replace SPECT for myocardial perfusion imaging?

George A Beller.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2009        PMID： 19885715     DOI： 10.1007/s12350-009-9152-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN： 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


× No keyword cloud information.
  11 in total

Review 1.  New technology for noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Marcelo F Di Carli; Rory Hachamovitch
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow will reform the detection of CAD.

Authors:  Juhani Knuuti; Sami Kajander; Maija Mäki; Heikki Ukkonen
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Cardiac positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Frank M Bengel; Takahiro Higuchi; Mehrbod S Javadi; Riikka Lautamäki
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 4.  The clinical value of myocardial blood flow measurement.

Authors:  Paolo G Camici; Ornella E Rimoldi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 5.  Noninvasive assessment of myocardial perfusion.

Authors:  Michael Salerno; George A Beller
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 7.792

Review 6.  Does coronary flow trump coronary anatomy?

Authors:  K Lance Gould
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-08

7.  Incremental prognostic value of gated Rb-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging over clinical variables and rest LVEF.

Authors:  Sharmila Dorbala; Rory Hachamovitch; Zelmira Curillova; Deepak Thomas; Divya Vangala; Raymond Y Kwong; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-07

8.  Evaluation of the novel myocardial perfusion positron-emission tomography tracer 18F-BMS-747158-02: comparison to 13N-ammonia and validation with microspheres in a pig model.

Authors:  S G Nekolla; S Reder; A Saraste; T Higuchi; G Dzewas; A Preissel; M Huisman; T Poethko; T Schuster; M Yu; S Robinson; D Casebier; J Henke; H J Wester; M Schwaiger
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Long-term prognostic value of 13N-ammonia myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography added value of coronary flow reserve.

Authors:  Bernhard A Herzog; Lars Husmann; Ines Valenta; Oliver Gaemperli; Patrick T Siegrist; Fabian M Tay; Nina Burkhard; Christophe A Wyss; Philipp A Kaufmann
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Reproducibility and accuracy of quantitative myocardial blood flow assessment with (82)Rb PET: comparison with (13)N-ammonia PET.

Authors:  Georges El Fakhri; Arash Kardan; Arkadiusz Sitek; Sharmila Dorbala; Nathalie Abi-Hatem; Youmna Lahoud; Alan Fischman; Martha Coughlan; Tsunehiro Yasuda; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 10.057
View more
  3 in total

1.  Positron emission and single-photon emission imaging: synergy rather than competition.

Authors:  Giuliano Mariani; H William Strauss
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Investigation of dynamic SPECT measurements of the arterial input function in human subjects using simulation, phantom and human studies.

Authors:  Celeste D Winant; Carina Mari Aparici; Yuval R Zelnik; Bryan W Reutter; Arkadiusz Sitek; Stephen L Bacharach; Grant T Gullberg
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  New Imaging Protocols for New Single Photon Emission CT Technologies.

Authors:  Piotr J Slomka; Daniel S Berman; Guido Germano
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep       Date:  2010-04-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.