Literature DB >> 19555792

Typical somatic symptoms of pregnancy and their impact on a diagnosis of major depressive disorder.

Kimberly Ann Yonkers1, Megan V Smith, Nathan Gotman, Kathleen Belanger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether trimester of pregnancy influences the ability to diagnose major depressive disorder (MDD).
METHOD: Eight hundred thirty-eight subjects completed a Composite International Diagnostic Interview and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) before 17 weeks of pregnancy, at 26-30 weeks of pregnancy and at 4-12 weeks postpartum. Subjects responded to a checklist of MDD symptoms regardless of stem question endorsement. We compared rates of symptom expression by response (Y/N) to stem questions, and trimester, using logit analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curves determined optimal EPDS thresholds.
RESULTS: Most symptoms from the DSM-IV checklist were endorsed significantly more often in the first compared to later trimesters (odds ratios ranged from 1.39 to 14.16 for the first vs. later trimesters), independent of response to depression stem questions or medication treatment. Despite this, stem-positive and stem-negative groups differed significantly for 10 out of 13 symptoms (odds ratios, 2.29-6.89), independent of trimester. The EPDS had an optimal cutoff of 10 and showed acceptable predictive value.
CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant women commonly experience somatic and other symptoms in this first trimester, but depressed women still differ from those who are not depressed. "Appetite increase," "oversleeping" and "increase in energy" (e.g., agitation) were uninformative with regard to an MDD diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19555792      PMCID: PMC2748743          DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry        ISSN: 0163-8343            Impact factor:   3.238


  12 in total

1.  Review of validation studies of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale.

Authors:  M Eberhard-Gran; A Eskild; K Tambs; S Opjordsmoen; S O Samuelsen
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.392

2.  Measurement issues in postpartum depression part 2: assessment of somatic symptoms using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression.

Authors:  L E Ross; S E Gilbert Evans; E M Sellers; M K Romach
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  Issues for DSM-V: simplifying DSM-IV to enhance utility: the case of major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Gavin Andrews; Tim Slade; Matthew Sunderland; Tracy Anderson
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 18.112

4.  Variability in use of cut-off scores and formats on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: implications for clinical and research practice.

Authors:  S Matthey; C Henshaw; S Elliott; B Barnett
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2006-10-02       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 5.  Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems.

Authors:  J A Swets
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-06-03       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Structure of depressive symptoms in pregnancy and the postpartum period.

Authors:  M Sugawara; S Sakamoto; T Kitamura; M A Toda; S Shima
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.839

7.  Screening for postnatal depression in routine primary care: properties of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in an Australian sample.

Authors:  Jeannette Milgrom; Jennifer Ericksen; Lisa Negri; Alan W Gemmill
Journal:  Aust N Z J Psychiatry       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.744

8.  Somatic complaints among pregnant women cared for in obstetrics: normal pregnancy or depressive and anxiety symptom amplification revisited?

Authors:  R H Kelly; J Russo; W Katon
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.238

9.  Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale.

Authors:  J L Cox; J M Holden; R Sagovsky
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 9.319

Review 10.  Reliability and validity studies of the WHO--Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI): a critical review.

Authors:  H U Wittchen
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.791

View more
  23 in total

1.  Cross-cultural validity of the Spanish version of PHQ-9 among pregnant Peruvian women: a Rasch item response theory analysis.

Authors:  Qiuyue Zhong; Bizu Gelaye; Jesse R Fann; Sixto E Sanchez; Michelle A Williams
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 4.839

Review 2.  Diagnostic performance of major depression disorder case-finding instruments used among mothers of young children in the United States: A systematic review.

Authors:  Arthur H Owora; Hélène Carabin; Jessica Reese; Tabitha Garwe
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 4.839

3.  Comparative performance of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale for screening antepartum depression.

Authors:  Qiuyue Zhong; Bizu Gelaye; Marta Rondon; Sixto E Sánchez; Pedro J García; Elena Sánchez; Yasmin V Barrios; Gregory E Simon; David C Henderson; Swee May Cripe; Michelle A Williams
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 4.839

4.  Supporting psychological well-being around the time of birth: what can we learn from maternity care?

Authors:  Fiona Alderdice
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 49.548

5.  Pregnant women with posttraumatic stress disorder and risk of preterm birth.

Authors:  Kimberly Ann Yonkers; Megan V Smith; Ariadna Forray; C Neill Epperson; Darce Costello; Haiqun Lin; Kathleen Belanger
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 21.596

6.  Do the PHQ-8 and the PHQ-2 accurately screen for depressive disorders in a sample of pregnant women?

Authors:  Megan V Smith; Nathan Gotman; Haiqun Lin; Kimberly A Yonkers
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 3.238

7.  Prenatal hazardous substance use and adverse birth outcomes.

Authors:  Odayme Quesada; Nathan Gotman; Heather B Howell; Edmund F Funai; Bruce J Rounsaville; Kimberly A Yonkers
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2012-05-11

Review 8.  Summary diagnostic validity of commonly used maternal major depression disorder case finding instruments in the United States: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Arthur H Owora; Hélène Carabin; Jessica Reese; Tabitha Garwe
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 4.839

9.  Performance of a Culturally Tailored Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention Integrated in a Public Health Setting to Reduce Risk of Antepartum Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  D Elizabeth Jesse; Bradley N Gaynes; Elizabeth B Feldhousen; Edward R Newton; Shelia Bunch; Steven D Hollon
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 2.388

10.  Prevalence of Depression during Pregnancy in Spanish Women: Trajectory and Risk Factors in Each Trimester.

Authors:  M Carmen Míguez; M Belén Vázquez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.