Literature DB >> 19553058

Exploring perceptions of genetic testing: an examination of perceived accuracy over time.

Randi Shedlosky-Shoemaker1, Tho L Ngo, Amy K Ferketich, Kyle Porter, Howard Leventhal, Kimberly M Kelly.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Despite the potential impact of perceptions of genetic testing, little research has examined these perceptions. The current study examined factors associated with perceived accuracy of genetic testing to detect BRCA1/2 mutations and change in perceived accuracy.
METHODS: Participants were recruited through advertisements, community groups, and local oncologists and gynecologists. Ashkenazi Jewish patients (N=120) at increased risk for BRCA1/2 genetic mutations were surveyed in a repeated-measures design with assessments at three time points: pre-counseling, post-counseling, and post-testing.
RESULTS: Better knowledge of cancer genetics related to higher perceived accuracy before counseling. Lower perceived risk of developing ovarian cancer was associated with increased perceived accuracy, while greater distress regarding gene status was associated with decreased perceived accuracy. Genetic test results were unrelated to change in perceived accuracy.
CONCLUSION: The results offer an initial look at how patients form perceptions of genetic testing. Both cognitive factors and affective factors relate to how patients perceived the accuracy of testing and how their perception changes over time. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Understanding cognitive and affective factors which may impact patients' perceptions of genetic testing is important. Specifically, attention should be paid to educating patients regarding cancer genetics and encouraging adaptive coping strategies to deal with distress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19553058     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  5 in total

1.  "Awakening to" a new meaning of being at-risk for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: a grounded theory study.

Authors:  April Manuel; Fern Brunger
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2015-01-27

2.  Breast Cancer Survivors' Knowledge of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer following Genetic Counseling: An Exploration of General and Survivor-Specific Knowledge Items.

Authors:  Courtney L Scherr; Juliette Christie; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 2.000

3.  Contemplating genetic feedback regarding lung cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  James A Shepperd; Corinne A Novell; Suzanne C O'Neill; Sharron L Docherty; Saskia C Sanderson; Colleen M McBride; Isaac M Lipkus
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2014-06

4.  The LEGACY Girls Study: Growth and Development in the Context of Breast Cancer Family History.

Authors:  Esther M John; Mary Beth Terry; Theresa H M Keegan; Angela R Bradbury; Julia A Knight; Wendy K Chung; Caren J Frost; Lothar Lilge; Linda Patrick-Miller; Lisa A Schwartz; Alice S Whittemore; Saundra S Buys; Mary B Daly; Irene L Andrulis
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 5.  The utility of Leventhal's model in the analysis of the psycho-behavioral implications of familial cancer - a literature review.

Authors:  Roxana Postolica; Magdalena Iorga; Mihaela Savin; Doina Azoicai; Violeta Enea
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.318

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.