Literature DB >> 19552937

Overview of telepathology, virtual microscopy, and whole slide imaging: prospects for the future.

Ronald S Weinstein1, Anna R Graham, Lynne C Richter, Gail P Barker, Elizabeth A Krupinski, Ana Maria Lopez, Kristine A Erps, Achyut K Bhattacharyya, Yukako Yagi, John R Gilbertson.   

Abstract

Telepathology, the practice of pathology at a long distance, has advanced continuously since 1986. Today, fourth-generation telepathology systems, so-called virtual slide telepathology systems, are being used for education applications. Both conventional and innovative surgical pathology diagnostic services are being designed and implemented as well. The technology has been commercialized by more than 30 companies in Asia, the United States, and Europe. Early adopters of telepathology have been laboratories with special challenges in providing anatomic pathology services, ranging from the need to provide anatomic pathology services at great distances to the use of the technology to increase efficiency of services between hospitals less than a mile apart. As to what often happens in medicine, early adopters of new technologies are professionals who create model programs that are successful and then stimulate the creation of infrastructure (ie, reimbursement, telecommunications, information technologies, and so on) that forms the platforms for entry of later, mainstream, adopters. The trend at medical schools, in the United States, is to go entirely digital for their pathology courses, discarding their student light microscopes, and building virtual slide laboratories. This may create a generation of pathology trainees who prefer digital pathology imaging over the traditional hands-on light microscopy. The creation of standards for virtual slide telepathology is early in its development but accelerating. The field of telepathology has now reached a tipping point at which major corporations now investing in the technology will insist that standards be created for pathology digital imaging as a value added business proposition. A key to success in teleradiology, already a growth industry, has been the implementation of standards for digital radiology imaging. Telepathology is already the enabling technology for new, innovative laboratory services. Examples include STAT QA surgical pathology second opinions at a distance and a telehealth-enabled rapid breast care service. The innovative bundling of telemammography, telepathology, and teleoncology services may represent a new paradigm in breast care that helps address the serious issue of fragmentation of breast cancer care in the United States and elsewhere. Legal and regulatory issues in telepathology are being addressed and are regarded as a potential catalyst for the next wave of telepathology advances, applications, and implementations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19552937     DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2009.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  93 in total

1.  Observer performance using virtual pathology slides: impact of LCD color reproduction accuracy.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski; Louis D Silverstein; Syed F Hashmi; Anna R Graham; Ronald S Weinstein; Hans Roehrig
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Rapid screening of cancer margins in tissue with multimodal confocal microscopy.

Authors:  Daniel S Gareau; Hana Jeon; Kishwer S Nehal; Milind Rajadhyaksha
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 3.  Morphology in the Digital Age: Integrating High-Resolution Description of Structural Alterations With Phenotypes and Genotypes.

Authors:  Cynthia C Nast; Kevin V Lemley; Jeffrey B Hodgin; Serena Bagnasco; Carmen Avila-Casado; Stephen M Hewitt; Laura Barisoni
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.299

4.  Informatics technology mimics ecology: dense, mutualistic collaboration networks are associated with higher publication rates.

Authors:  Marco D Sorani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Evaluation environment for digital and analog pathology: a platform for validation studies.

Authors:  Brandon D Gallas; Marios A Gavrielides; Catherine M Conway; Adam Ivansky; Tyler C Keay; Wei-Chung Cheng; Jason Hipp; Stephen M Hewitt
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-11-12

Review 6.  The Empirical Foundations of Telepathology: Evidence of Feasibility and Intermediate Effects.

Authors:  Rashid L Bashshur; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Ronald S Weinstein; Matthew R Dunn; Noura Bashshur
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 3.536

7.  Detection of pancreatic tumor cell nuclei via a hyperspectral analysis of pathological slides based on stain spectra.

Authors:  Masahiro Ishikawa; Chisato Okamoto; Kazuma Shinoda; Hideki Komagata; Chika Iwamoto; Kenoki Ohuchida; Makoto Hashizume; Akinobu Shimizu; Naoki Kobayashi
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  Automatic quantification of morphological features for hepatic trabeculae analysis in stained liver specimens.

Authors:  Masahiro Ishikawa; Yuri Murakami; Sercan Taha Ahi; Masahiro Yamaguchi; Naoki Kobayashi; Tomoharu Kiyuna; Yoshiko Yamashita; Akira Saito; Tokiya Abe; Akinori Hashiguchi; Michiie Sakamoto
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-06-03

Review 9.  Digital transplantation pathology: combining whole slide imaging, multiplex staining and automated image analysis.

Authors:  K Isse; A Lesniak; K Grama; B Roysam; M I Minervini; A J Demetris
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 8.086

10.  Telecytology for Rapid On-Site Evaluation: Current Status.

Authors:  Oscar Lin
Journal:  J Am Soc Cytopathol       Date:  2017-10-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.