Literature DB >> 19552927

Increased intra-individual reaction time variability in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder across response inhibition tasks with different cognitive demands.

Rebecca G Vaurio1, Daniel J Simmonds, Stewart H Mostofsky.   

Abstract

One of the most consistent findings in children with ADHD is increased moment-to-moment variability in reaction time (RT). The source of increased RT variability can be examined using ex-Gaussian analyses that divide variability into normal and exponential components and Fast Fourier transform (FFT) that allow for detailed examination of the frequency of responses in the exponential distribution. Prior studies of ADHD using these methods have produced variable results, potentially related to differences in task demand. The present study sought to examine the profile of RT variability in ADHD using two Go/No-go tasks with differing levels of cognitive demand. A total of 140 children (57 with ADHD and 83 typically developing controls), ages 8-13 years, completed both a "simple" Go/No-go task and a more "complex" Go/No-go task with increased working memory load. Repeated measures ANOVA of ex-Gaussian functions revealed for both tasks children with ADHD demonstrated increased variability in both the normal/Gaussian (significantly elevated sigma) and the exponential (significantly elevated tau) components. In contrast, FFT analysis of the exponential component revealed a significant task x diagnosis interaction, such that infrequent slow responses in ADHD differed depending on task demand (i.e., for the simple task, increased power in the 0.027-0.074 Hz frequency band; for the complex task, decreased power in the 0.074-0.202 Hz band). The ex-Gaussian findings revealing increased variability in both the normal (sigma) and exponential (tau) components for the ADHD group, suggest that both impaired response preparation and infrequent "lapses in attention" contribute to increased variability in ADHD. FFT analyses reveal that the periodicity of intermittent lapses of attention in ADHD varies with task demand. The findings provide further support for intra-individual variability as a candidate intermediate endophenotype of ADHD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19552927      PMCID: PMC4766847          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.01.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  36 in total

1.  fMRI evidence that the neural basis of response inhibition is task-dependent.

Authors:  Stewart H Mostofsky; Joanna G B Schafer; Michael T Abrams; Melissa C Goldberg; Abigail A Flower; Avery Boyce; Susan M Courtney; Vince D Calhoun; Michael A Kraut; Martha B Denckla; James J Pekar
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2003-07

Review 2.  Neuroscience of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: the search for endophenotypes.

Authors:  F Xavier Castellanos; Rosemary Tannock
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Functional brain correlates of response time variability in children.

Authors:  Daniel J Simmonds; Sunaina G Fotedar; Stacy J Suskauer; James J Pekar; Martha B Denckla; Stewart H Mostofsky
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-01-21       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Event-related FMRI evidence of frontotemporal involvement in aberrant response inhibition and task switching in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Leanne Tamm; Vinod Menon; Jessica Ringel; Allan L Reiss
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 8.829

5.  Response variability in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: evidence for neuropsychological heterogeneity.

Authors:  Katherine A Johnson; Simon P Kelly; Mark A Bellgrove; Edwina Barry; Marie Cox; Michael Gill; Ian H Robertson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Continuous-processing--related event-related potentials in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  R J Strandburg; J T Marsh; W S Brown; R F Asarnow; J Higa; R Harper; D Guthrie
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1996-11-15       Impact factor: 13.382

7.  Staying on the job: the frontal lobes control individual performance variability.

Authors:  Donald T Stuss; Kelly J Murphy; Malcolm A Binns; Michael P Alexander
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2003-07-22       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Decomposing intra-subject variability in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Adriana Di Martino; Manely Ghaffari; Jocelyn Curchack; Philip Reiss; Christopher Hyde; Marina Vannucci; Eva Petkova; Donald F Klein; F Xavier Castellanos
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 9.  Characterizing cognition in ADHD: beyond executive dysfunction.

Authors:  F Xavier Castellanos; Edmund J S Sonuga-Barke; Michael P Milham; Rosemary Tannock
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 10.  A review of the biological bases of ADHD: what have we learned from imaging studies?

Authors:  Sarah Durston
Journal:  Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev       Date:  2003
View more
  86 in total

1.  Binocular rivalry transitions predict inattention symptom severity in adult ADHD.

Authors:  Aiste Jusyte; Natalia Zaretskaya; Nina Maria Höhnle; Andreas Bartels; Michael Schönenberg
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 5.270

2.  Rapid automatized naming (RAN) in children with ADHD: An ex-Gaussian analysis.

Authors:  Matthew Ryan; Lisa A Jacobson; Cole Hague; Alison Bellows; Martha B Denckla; E Mark Mahone
Journal:  Child Neuropsychol       Date:  2016-04-24       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  The Validity of a Frustration Paradigm to Assess the Effect of Frustration on Cognitive Control in School-Age Children.

Authors:  Karen E Seymour; Keri S Rosch; Alyssa Tiedemann; Stewart H Mostofsky
Journal:  Behav Ther       Date:  2019-07-05

Review 4.  Is reaction time variability in ADHD mainly at low frequencies?

Authors:  Sarah L Karalunas; Cynthia L Huang-Pollock; Joel T Nigg
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 8.982

5.  Preliminary evidence for reduced posterror reaction time slowing in hyperactive/inattentive preschool children.

Authors:  Olga G Berwid; Jeffrey M Halperin; Ray Johnson; David J Marks
Journal:  Child Neuropsychol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 2.500

6.  Behavioral and Neural Sustained Attention Deficits in Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

Authors:  David Pagliaccio; Jillian Lee Wiggins; Nancy E Adleman; Alexa Curhan; Susan Zhang; Kenneth E Towbin; Melissa A Brotman; Daniel S Pine; Ellen Leibenluft
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 8.829

7.  Interstimulus jitter facilitates response control in children with ADHD.

Authors:  Matthew Ryan; Rebecca Martin; Martha B Denckla; Stewart H Mostofsky; E Mark Mahone
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 2.892

8.  Investigating the Impact of Cognitive Load and Motivation on Response Control in Relation to Delay Discounting in Children with ADHD.

Authors:  Mary K Martinelli; Stewart H Mostofsky; Keri S Rosch
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2017-10

9.  Behavioral correlates of reaction time variability in children with and without ADHD.

Authors:  Tanya N Antonini; Megan E Narad; Joshua M Langberg; Jeffery N Epstein
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Response time intra-subject variability: commonalities between children with autism spectrum disorders and children with ADHD.

Authors:  Nicoletta Adamo; Lan Huo; Samantha Adelsberg; Eva Petkova; F Xavier Castellanos; Adriana Di Martino
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 4.785

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.