BACKGROUND: Intraindividual variability in reaction times (RT variability) has garnered increasing interest as an indicator of cognitive and neurobiological dysfunction in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Recent theory and research has emphasized specific low-frequency patterns of RT variability. However, whether group differences are specific to low frequencies is not well examined. METHOD: Two studies are presented. The first is a quantitative review of seven previously published studies that have examined patterns of RT variability in ADHD. The second provides new data from a substantially larger sample of children than in prior studies (N(Control) = 42; NADHD = 123). The children completed a choice RT task as part of a traditional go/stop task. Fast-Fourier transform analyses were applied to assess patterns of variability. RESULTS: Quantitative review of previous studies indicated that children with ADHD demonstrate more low-frequency variability than non-ADHD controls (Hedge's g = .39; 95% CI: .16-.62), but an equivalent excess variability in a faster frequency comparison band (g = .36; 95% CI: .03-.69), with a trivial and nonsignificant difference between ESs in each band. New data replicated results of the quantitative review with nearly identical effects in the low-frequency (g = .39; 95% CI: .05-.75) and faster frequency comparison bands (g = .40; 95% CI: .04-.74) and no evidence of diagnosis × frequency interaction (p = .954). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that theories of RT variability in ADHD that focus on low-frequency variability will need to be modified to account for the presence of variability at a broader range of frequencies.
BACKGROUND: Intraindividual variability in reaction times (RT variability) has garnered increasing interest as an indicator of cognitive and neurobiological dysfunction in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Recent theory and research has emphasized specific low-frequency patterns of RT variability. However, whether group differences are specific to low frequencies is not well examined. METHOD: Two studies are presented. The first is a quantitative review of seven previously published studies that have examined patterns of RT variability in ADHD. The second provides new data from a substantially larger sample of children than in prior studies (N(Control) = 42; NADHD = 123). The children completed a choice RT task as part of a traditional go/stop task. Fast-Fourier transform analyses were applied to assess patterns of variability. RESULTS: Quantitative review of previous studies indicated that children with ADHD demonstrate more low-frequency variability than non-ADHD controls (Hedge's g = .39; 95% CI: .16-.62), but an equivalent excess variability in a faster frequency comparison band (g = .36; 95% CI: .03-.69), with a trivial and nonsignificant difference between ESs in each band. New data replicated results of the quantitative review with nearly identical effects in the low-frequency (g = .39; 95% CI: .05-.75) and faster frequency comparison bands (g = .40; 95% CI: .04-.74) and no evidence of diagnosis × frequency interaction (p = .954). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that theories of RT variability in ADHD that focus on low-frequency variability will need to be modified to account for the presence of variability at a broader range of frequencies.
Authors: D Cordes; V M Haughton; K Arfanakis; J D Carew; P A Turski; C H Moritz; M A Quigley; M E Meyerand Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Ariel Beth Brown; Joseph Biederman; Eve Valera; Nikos Makris; Alysa Doyle; Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli; Eric Mick; Thomas Spencer; Stephen Faraone; Larry Seidman Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2011-05-18 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Katherine A Johnson; Simon P Kelly; Mark A Bellgrove; Edwina Barry; Marie Cox; Michael Gill; Ian H Robertson Journal: Neuropsychologia Date: 2006-12-08 Impact factor: 3.139
Authors: Katherine A Johnson; Edwina Barry; Mark A Bellgrove; Marie Cox; Simon P Kelly; Aoife Dáibhis; Michael Daly; Michelle Keavey; Amy Watchorn; Michael Fitzgerald; Fiona McNicholas; Aiveen Kirley; Ian H Robertson; Michael Gill Journal: Neuropsychologia Date: 2008-01-12 Impact factor: 3.139
Authors: Dardo Tomasi; Nora D Volkow; Ruiliang Wang; Frank Telang; Gene-Jack Wang; Linda Chang; Thomas Ernst; Joanna S Fowler Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-06-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Adriana Di Martino; Manely Ghaffari; Jocelyn Curchack; Philip Reiss; Christopher Hyde; Marina Vannucci; Eva Petkova; Donald F Klein; F Xavier Castellanos Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2008-04-18 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Hilde M Geurts; Raoul P P P Grasman; Sylvie Verté; Jaap Oosterlaan; Herbert Roeyers; Serena M van Kammen; Joseph A Sergeant Journal: Neuropsychologia Date: 2008-06-21 Impact factor: 3.139
Authors: Heather M Shappell; Kelly A Duffy; Keri S Rosch; James J Pekar; Stewart H Mostofsky; Martin A Lindquist; Jessica R Cohen Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2021-01-14 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Jojanneke A Bastiaansen; Tarrant D R Cummins; Harriëtte Riese; Arie M van Roon; Ilja M Nolte; Albertine J Oldehinkel; Mark A Bellgrove Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-05-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: J A Anguera; A N Brandes-Aitken; C E Rolle; S N Skinner; S S Desai; J D Bower; W E Martucci; W K Chung; E H Sherr; E J Marco Journal: Transl Psychiatry Date: 2016-09-20 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: Sarah L Karalunas; Hilde M Geurts; Kerstin Konrad; Stephan Bender; Joel T Nigg Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2014-03-13 Impact factor: 8.982