CONTEXT: Little is known about the influence of the primary care workplace on patient care. Assessing physician opinion through focus groups can elucidate factors related to safety and error in this setting. METHOD: During phase 1 of the Minimizing Error, Maximizing Outcome (MEMO) Study, 9 focus groups were conducted with 32 family physicians and general internists from 5 areas in the upper Midwest and New York City. RESULTS: The physicians described challenging settings with rapidly changing conditions. Patients are medically and psychosocially complex and often underinsured. Communication is complicated by multiple languages, time pressure, and inadequate information systems. Complex processes of care have missing elements including medication lists and test results. Physicians are pressed to be more productive, and key administrative decisions are made without their input. Targeted areas to improve safety and reduce error included teamwork, aligned leadership values, diversity, collegiality, and respect. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care physicians clearly described positive and negative workplace factors related to safety and error. The themes suggest that systems of care and their dynamic nature warrant attention. Enhancing positive and ameliorating negative cultures and processes of care could bring real benefits to patients, physicians, and ambulatory office settings.
CONTEXT: Little is known about the influence of the primary care workplace on patient care. Assessing physician opinion through focus groups can elucidate factors related to safety and error in this setting. METHOD: During phase 1 of the Minimizing Error, Maximizing Outcome (MEMO) Study, 9 focus groups were conducted with 32 family physicians and general internists from 5 areas in the upper Midwest and New York City. RESULTS: The physicians described challenging settings with rapidly changing conditions. Patients are medically and psychosocially complex and often underinsured. Communication is complicated by multiple languages, time pressure, and inadequate information systems. Complex processes of care have missing elements including medication lists and test results. Physicians are pressed to be more productive, and key administrative decisions are made without their input. Targeted areas to improve safety and reduce error included teamwork, aligned leadership values, diversity, collegiality, and respect. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care physicians clearly described positive and negative workplace factors related to safety and error. The themes suggest that systems of care and their dynamic nature warrant attention. Enhancing positive and ameliorating negative cultures and processes of care could bring real benefits to patients, physicians, and ambulatory office settings.
Authors: Urmimala Sarkar; Doug Bonacum; William Strull; Christiane Spitzmueller; Nancy Jin; Andrea López; Traber Davis Giardina; Ashley N D Meyer; Hardeep Singh Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2012-05-23 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Maura J McGuire; Gary Noronha; Lipika Samal; Hsin-Chieh Yeh; Susan Crocetti; Steven Kravet Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2012-08-11 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Mark Linzer; Sara Poplau; Roger Brown; Ellie Grossman; Anita Varkey; Steven Yale; Eric S Williams; Lanis Hicks; Jill Wallock; Diane Kohnhorst; Michael Barbouche Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-09-09 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Beverly Mielke Kocarnik; Chuan-Fen Liu; Edwin S Wong; Mark Perkins; Matthew L Maciejewski; Elizabeth M Yano; David H Au; John D Piette; Chris L Bryson Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2012-11-13 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Philip J Kroth; Nancy Morioka-Douglas; Sharry Veres; Katherine Pollock; Stewart Babbott; Sara Poplau; Katherine Corrigan; Mark Linzer Journal: JAMIA Open Date: 2018-06-11