Literature DB >> 19549872

Optical measurement of mGluR1 conformational changes reveals fast activation, slow deactivation, and sensitization.

Païkan Marcaggi1, Hiroki Mutoh, Dimitar Dimitrov, Marco Beato, Thomas Knöpfel.   

Abstract

Metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR) activation has been extensively studied under steady-state conditions. However, at central synapses, mGluRs are exposed to brief submillisecond glutamate transients and may not reach steady-state. The lack of information on the kinetics of mGluR activation impairs accurate predictions of their operation during synaptic transmission. Here, we report experiments designed to investigate mGluR kinetics in real-time. We inserted either CFP or YFP into the second intracellular loop of mGluR1beta. When these constructs were coexpressed in PC12 cells, glutamate application induced a conformational change that could be monitored, using fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), with an EC(50) of 7.5 microM. The FRET response was mimicked by the agonist DHPG, abolished by the competitive antagonist MCPG, and partially inhibited by mGluR1-selective allosteric modulators. These results suggest that the FRET response reports active conformations of mGluR1 dimers. The solution exchange at the cell membrane was optimized for voltage-clamped cells by recording the current induced by co-application of 30 mM potassium. When glutamate was applied at increasing concentrations up to 2 mM, the activation time course decreased to a minimum of approximately 10 ms, whereas the deactivation time course remained constant (approximately 50 ms). During long-lasting applications, no desensitization was observed. In contrast, we observed a robust sensitization of the FRET response that developed over approximately 400 ms. Activation, deactivation, and sensitization time courses and amplitudes were used to derive a kinetic scheme and rate constants, from which we inferred the EC(50) and frequency dependence of mGluR1 activation under non-steady-state conditions, as occurs during synaptic transmission.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19549872      PMCID: PMC2700146          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0901290106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  40 in total

1.  The metabotropic glutamate G-protein-coupled receptors mGluR3 and mGluR1a are voltage-sensitive.

Authors:  Lily Ohana; Ofra Barchad; Itzchak Parnas; Hanna Parnas
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Movement of 'gating charge' is coupled to ligand binding in a G-protein-coupled receptor.

Authors:  Yair Ben-Chaim; Baron Chanda; Nathan Dascal; Francisco Bezanilla; Itzchak Parnas; Hanna Parnas
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Real-time optical recording of beta1-adrenergic receptor activation reveals supersensitivity of the Arg389 variant to carvedilol.

Authors:  Francesca Rochais; Jean-Pierre Vilardaga; Viacheslav O Nikolaev; Moritz Bünemann; Martin J Lohse; Stefan Engelhardt
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Optical measurement of synaptic glutamate spillover and reuptake by linker optimized glutamate-sensitive fluorescent reporters.

Authors:  Samuel Andrew Hires; Yongling Zhu; Roger Y Tsien
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Kinetics of G-protein-coupled receptor signals in intact cells.

Authors:  M J Lohse; P Hein; C Hoffmann; V O Nikolaev; J-P Vilardaga; M Bünemann
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 8.739

6.  S4-based voltage sensors have three major conformations.

Authors:  Carlos A Villalba-Galea; Walter Sandtner; Dorine M Starace; Francisco Bezanilla
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  mGluR1 in cerebellar Purkinje cells essential for long-term depression, synapse elimination, and motor coordination.

Authors:  T Ichise; M Kano; K Hashimoto; D Yanagihara; K Nakao; R Shigemoto; M Katsuki; A Aiba
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-06-09       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Surface expression of metabotropic glutamate receptor variants mGluR1a and mGluR1b in transfected HEK293 cells.

Authors:  Jiri Kumpost; Zdenka Syrova; Lenka Kulihova; Daniela Frankova; Jean-Charles Bologna; Veronika Hlavackova; Laurent Prezeau; Michaela Kralikova; Bohdana Hruskova; Jean-Philippe Pin; Jaroslav Blahos
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 9.  Type-1 metabotropic glutamate receptor in cerebellar Purkinje cells: a key molecule responsible for long-term depression, endocannabinoid signalling and synapse elimination.

Authors:  Masanobu Kano; Kouichi Hashimoto; Toshihide Tabata
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 10.  Agonist-selective mechanisms of GPCR desensitization.

Authors:  E Kelly; C P Bailey; G Henderson
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 8.739

View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  Structure and ligand recognition of class C GPCRs.

Authors:  Lei Chun; Wen-hua Zhang; Jian-feng Liu
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 6.150

2.  Interdomain movements in metabotropic glutamate receptor activation.

Authors:  Siluo Huang; Jianhua Cao; Ming Jiang; Gilles Labesse; Jianfeng Liu; Jean-Philippe Pin; Philippe Rondard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Conformational dynamics between transmembrane domains and allosteric modulation of a metabotropic glutamate receptor.

Authors:  Vanessa A Gutzeit; Jordana Thibado; Daniel Starer Stor; Zhou Zhou; Scott C Blanchard; Olaf S Andersen; Joshua Levitz
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Distinct roles of metabotropic glutamate receptor dimerization in agonist activation and G-protein coupling.

Authors:  Driss El Moustaine; Sébastien Granier; Etienne Doumazane; Pauline Scholler; Rita Rahmeh; Patrick Bron; Bernard Mouillac; Jean-Louis Banères; Philippe Rondard; Jean-Philippe Pin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Genetically encoded optical indicators for the analysis of neuronal circuits.

Authors:  Thomas Knöpfel
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 6.  Probing neuronal activities with genetically encoded optical indicators: from a historical to a forward-looking perspective.

Authors:  Hiroki Mutoh; Thomas Knöpfel
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.657

Review 7.  Optogenetic reporters: Fluorescent protein-based genetically encoded indicators of signaling and metabolism in the brain.

Authors:  Mathew Tantama; Yin Pun Hung; Gary Yellen
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.453

8.  Neuronal Glutamate Transporters Control Dopaminergic Signaling and Compulsive Behaviors.

Authors:  Stefania Bellini; Kelsey E Fleming; Modhurika De; John P McCauley; Maurice A Petroccione; Lianna Y D'Brant; Artem Tkachenko; SoYoung Kwon; Lindsey A Jones; Annalisa Scimemi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Phosphomimetic mutations enhance oligomerization of phospholemman and modulate its interaction with the Na/K-ATPase.

Authors:  Qiujing Song; Sandeep Pallikkuth; Julie Bossuyt; Donald M Bers; Seth L Robia
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 10.  Structural and Biophysical Mechanisms of Class C G Protein-Coupled Receptor Function.

Authors:  Amr Ellaithy; Javier Gonzalez-Maeso; Diomedes A Logothetis; Joshua Levitz
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 13.807

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.